Abstract
The government of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero carried out remarkable political reforms inspired by republicanism. However, the progress in civil rights was not followed by an alternative political economic model since republicanism, in its social democratic form, did not attempt to challenge the neoliberal model. From its emergence, Podemos adopts a populist approach by mainly emphasizing the conflict between the people and the elite. When the party became part of the institutions, a political contradiction arose: If the vindication of the people as political subjects responds to the unsatisfactory functioning of institutions, how can institutions be transformed from within, and what role should the people play in this framework? This question is even more relevant since Podemos emphasizes the crisis of the institutional realm and the need to redo it.
The chapter addresses the relationship between two traditionally opposed political theories and their application in the Spanish context: populism and republicanism. The initial populist approach soon entered into dialogue with republicanism, as reflected in the republican critique of populism made by José Luis Villacañas in his work Populism and by Carlos Fernández Liria in In Defence of Populism. I propose that rather than abandoning populism in the name of republicanism, some principles for a republican populism can be extracted from Podemos’ political praxis: non-domination as a conflictual principle, controlling power (institutional and street arenas), common-wealth patriotism, and trimodal party organization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Agustin, G. O. (2006) El socialismo cívico de Zapatero y el republicanismo. Sociedad y discurso, 9.
Carreño, S. (2017, May 21). Motivos para echarlos. La Rioja.
Cordero Fuentes, J. A. (2008). Socialdemocracia republicana: hacia una formulación cívica del socialismo. Barcelona: Montesinos.
Errejón, I. (2015). We the people el 15-M: ¿un populismo indignado? ACME, 14(1), 124–156.
Fraser, N. (2013). A triple movement? Parsing the politics of crisis after Polanyi. New Left Review, 81, 119–132.
Gallego-Díaz, S. (2001, July 22). Entrevista a José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero: La socialdemocracia debe abrirse a propuestas de la izquierda plural. El País.
García Abad, J. (2001) Derecha e izquierda en el patriotismo constitucional. El Siglo, 487.
Iglesias, P. (2016, October 12). #MiPatriaEsLaGente. You Tube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=121&v=Le0W1OEhDT0. Accessed 1 May 2017.
Lessig, L. (2011). Republic, lost: How money corrupts congress—And a plan to stop it. New York: Hachette Book Group.
Liria, F. C. (2016). En defensa del populismo. Madrid: Los Libros de la Catarata.
Mathieson, D. (2004). Blair’s doppelganger: Zapatero and the new Spanish left. London: Foreign Policy Centre.
Molpeceres, D. (2016, March 6). Villacañas: “Iglesias debe cambiar si no quiere ser un populista jacobino.” Voz Pópuli. http://www.vozpopuli.com/actualidad/nacional/Populismos-Pablo_Iglesias-UCM-jose_luis_villacanas-populismo-neoliberalismo-ucm-complutense_0_893610635.html. Accessed 1 May 2017.
Morada (2016a, May 10). Presentación del libro de José Luis Villacañas ‘Populismo’. You Tube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVVRKfNaOSo. Accessed 1 May 2017.
Morada (2016b, March 15). De la hipótesis Podemos al ciclo post 20D. You Tube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCSitn9f9f8. Accessed 1 May 2017.
Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Reihe Politikwissenschaft/Political Science Series, 72.
Navarro, V. (1999). Is there a third way? A response to Giddens’s the third way. International Journal of Health Services, 29(4), 667–677.
Ovejero, F., Martí, J. L., & Gargarella, R. (2004). La alternativa republicana. In F. Ovejero et al. (Eds.), Nuevas ideas republicanas.Autogobierno y libertad (pp. 11–73). Barcelona: Paidós.
Pavon, H. (2015, August 28). Entrevista con Maurizio Viroli. Maquiavelo y el patriotismo republicano. Clarín. https://www.clarin.com/rn/ideas/Maquiavelo-patriotismo-republicano_0_H1u44NFwQe.html. Accessed 1 May 2017.
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism. A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. (2008). Examen a Zapatero. Balance del gobierno socialista. Madrid: Ediciones Temas de Hoy.
Pettit, P. (2011). Republic reflections on the 15-M movement. Books and Ideas.net. http://www.booksandideas.net/Republican-Reflections-on-the-15-M.html. Accessed 1 May 2017.
Redacción. (2016, January 17). Íñigo Errejón: “Defender la patria es defender a la gente corriente.” Press Digital. http://www.pressdigital.es/texto-diario/mostrar/396010/inigo-errejon-defender-patria-defender-gente-corriente. Accessed 1 May 2017.
Sagos, N. S. (2014). Democracy, emergency, and arbitrary coercion: A liberal republican view. Leiden: Brill.
Sevilla, J. (2002). De nuevo socialismo. Barcelona: Crítica.
Villacañas, J. L. (2014, June 24). Épocas calientes. Levante. http://www.levante-emv.com/opinion/2014/06/24/epocas-calientes/1129137.html. Accessed 1 May 2017.
Villacañas, J. L. (2015). Populismo. Madrid: La Huerta Grande Editorial.
Viroli, M. (2001). El sentido olvidado del patriotismo republicano. Isegoría, 24, 5–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agustín, Ó.G. (2018). We the People or We the Republic? The Need for Republican Populism. In: García Agustín, Ó., Briziarelli, M. (eds) Podemos and the New Political Cycle. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63432-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63432-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63431-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63432-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)