Skip to main content

Studying Complex Care Transitions from a Quantitative Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Researching Quality in Care Transitions

Abstract

In this chapter, Bragstad and Foss highlight key methodological challenges and lessons learned when studying complex care transitions from a quantitative perspective. Key challenges with regard to designing and planning the study, developing survey instruments and conducting survey research on transitional care is emphasized. The research examples used throughout this chapter are predominantly linked to a study exploring older patients’ and their next of kin’s experiences with transition from hospital to municipal care. The methodological challenges are, however, applicable to a wider context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In Norway, every hospital uses the same questionnaire to measure patient experiences, and this is published on a website, where patient satisfaction is used as one of several quality indicators patients can use for selecting hospitals.

  2. 2.

    Patients discharged from hospital to home without home care is of course also an interesting group, but as the focus of the study was on transitions between different levels of care, this group was outside the focus of our study.

  3. 3.

    This was later tested with a sample from the study population as described under the piloting of the questionnaire.

  4. 4.

    A good Guttman scale should have a coefficient of reproducibility (the percentage of original responses that could be reproduced by knowing the scale scores used to summarize them) above 0.85.

References

  • Abma, T. A., Nierse, C. J., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2009). Patients as partners in responsive research: Methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qualitative Health Research, 19(3), 401–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragstad, L. K. (2015). Indispensable intermediaries: The role of informal caregivers in the discharge process of older relatives. Oslo: Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine/University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragstad, L. K., Kirkevold, M., Hofoss, D., & Foss, C. (2012). Factors predicting a successful post-discharge outcome for individuals aged 80 years and over. International Journal of Integrated Care, 12, e147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bragstad, L. K., Kirkevold, M., Hofoss, D., & Foss, C. (2014). Informal caregivers’ participation when older adults in Norway are discharged from the hospital. Health & Social Care in the Community, 22, 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, E. A. (2003). Falling through the cracks: Challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care for persons with continuous complex care needs. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 549–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, C. (2011). Elders and patient participation revisited – A discourse analytic approach to older persons’ reflections on patient participation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20, 2014–2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, C., & Askautrud, M. (2010). Measuring the participation of elderly patients in the discharge process from hospital: A critical review of existing instruments. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 24, 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, C., & Hofoss, D. (2011). Elderly persons’ experiences of participation in hospital discharge process. Patient Education and Counseling, 85, 68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellevik, O. (2002). Forskningsmetode i sosiologi og statsvitenskap [research methods in sociology and political science]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. H. (2016a). Under-appreciated steps in instrument development, part I: Starting with validity. Research in Nursing & Health, 39, 81–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. H. (2016b). Under-appreciated steps in instrument development, part II: Ending with validity. Research in Nursing & Health, 39, 135–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, P., & Hewison, J. (1999). Disagreement in patient and carer assessment of functional abilities after stroke. Stroke, 30, 934–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research : Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. G. (2007). The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: A taxonomy. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 1297–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bragstad, L.K., Foss, C. (2017). Studying Complex Care Transitions from a Quantitative Perspective. In: Aase, K., Waring, J., Schibevaag, L. (eds) Researching Quality in Care Transitions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62346-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62346-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62345-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62346-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics