Skip to main content

Let’s Learn Together: Team Integration Climate, Individual States and Learning Using Computer-Based Simulations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Technology and Organizational Change

Abstract

The present study analyses individual learning in a computer-based simulation setting (business game). In particular, the study points out the importance of the team environment in stimulating individual states that may foster individual learning. By taking into account 402 individuals who participated in a computer-based simulation, we underscore that individual perception of integration climate fosters individual curiosity and decreases individual aggressiveness. Moreover, we outline that individual curiosity does have an impact on individual learning.

Authors are listed alphabetically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Meyer, J. P. (2003). Four territories of experience: A developmental action inquiry approach to outdoor-adventure experiential learning. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(4), 352–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Research commentary: Computer mediated learning—A call for greater depth and breadth for research. Information System Research, 12, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lundgren, T. D., & Nantz, K. S. (2003). Student attitudes toward internet courses: A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(3), 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(3), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Michaelson, R., Helliar, C., Power, D., & Sinclair, D. (2001). Evaluating FINESSE: A case-study in group-based CAL. Computers & Education, 37(1), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Proserpio L., & Magni, M. (2005). Learning through business games. In Encyclopaedia of multimedia technology and networking, Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive Conceptions of Learning. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 411–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pellegrino, J. W., & Glaser, R. (1982). Analyzing aptitudes for learning: inductive reasoning. In R. Glasser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 269–345). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss, M., Hoegl, M., & Gibbert, M. (2011). Making virtue of necessity: The role of team climate for innovation in resource constrained innovation projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(s1), 196–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Reilly, C. A., & Caldwell, D. F. (1985). The impact of normative social influence and cohesiveness on task perceptions and attitudes: A social information processing approach. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York City: McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Justice and leader-member exchange: The moderating role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, J. T., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 794–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Magni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Caporarello, L., Magni, M., Pennarola, F. (2018). Let’s Learn Together: Team Integration Climate, Individual States and Learning Using Computer-Based Simulations. In: Rossignoli, C., Virili, F., Za, S. (eds) Digital Technology and Organizational Change. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62051-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics