Abstract
Understandings of how and why patterns of domestic energy demand change over biographical time remain poorly understood. The predominant practice-theoretical approach to exploring dynamics has been to explore the biographies of practices themselves with the consequence that there has been little exploration of individuals’ lives. This is despite the importance of individuals’ biographic experience for shaping patterns of performance, reproduction and change over time. This chapter discusses concepts and methods employed in a qualitative study focused on understanding patterns and processes shaping biographic dynamics in key household practices implicated in energy demand, namely food, mobility and laundry practices. Findings reveal that practice careers are strongly shaped by social, institutional and technological change which are implicated in shifting temporal and relational dynamics of domestic practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Beck, U., and E.B. Beck-Gernshein. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social. London: Sage.
Burningham, K., S. Venn, I. Christie, et al. 2014. New motherhood: A moment of change in everyday shopping practices? Young Consumers 15 (3): 211–226.
Butler, C., K. Parkhill, and K. Bickerstaff. 2016. Welfare policy, practice and energy demand. Demand international conference, Lancaster, 13–15 April.
Chamberlayne, P., J. Bornat, and T. Wengraf. 2000. Turn to biographical methods in social science: Comparative issues and examples. London: Routledge.
Greene, M., and H. Rau. 2016. Moving across the life course: The potential of a biographic approach to researching dynamics of everyday mobility practices. Journal of Consumer Culture (in press).
Hards, S. 2011. Careers of action on climate change: The evolution of practices throughout the life-course. In Social policy and social work. York: University of York.
Henwood, K., N. Pidgeon, C. Groves, et al. 2015. Energy biographies research report. Cardiff: Cardiff University. Available at http://energybiographies.org
Hochschild, A.R. 1997. The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Jaeger-Erben, M. 2013. Everyday life in transition: Biographical research and sustainability. In Methods of sustainability research in the social sciences, ed. F. Fahy and H. Rau. London: Sage.
Jaeger-Erben, M., and U. Offenberger. 2014. A practice theory approach to sustainable consumption. Gaia, 23: 166–174.
Lanzendorf, M. 2010. Key events and their effect on mobility biographies: The case of childbirth. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 4 (5): 272–292.
McGinnty, F., H. Russell, J. Williams, et al. 2005. Time-use in Ireland 2005: Survey report. Dublin: The Economic and Social Research Institute.
Owens, R.C. 2005. A social history of women in Ireland, 1870–1970: An exploration of the changing role and status of women in Irish society. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.
Pred, A. 1977. The choreography of existence: Comments on Hägerstrand’s time-geography and its usefulness. Economic Geography, 53 (2): 207–221.
———. 1981a. Social reproduction and the time-geography of everyday life. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 63 (1): 5–22.
———. 1981b. Of paths and projects: Individual behavior and its societal context. Behavioral Problems in Geography Revisited: 231–255.
Røpke, I. 2009. Theories of practice—New inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecological Economics 68 (10): 2490–2497.
Royston, S. 2016. Invisible energy policy in higher education. Demand centre conference, Lancaster, 13–15 April 2016.
Sayer, A. 2013. Power, sustainability and wellbeing: An outsiders view. In Sustainable practices: Social theory and climate change, ed. E. Shove and N. Spurling, 167–180. London: Routledge.
Shove, E., and M. Pantzar. 2007. Recruitment and reproduction: The careers and carriers of digital photography and floorball. Human Affairs 17 (2): 154–167.
Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.
Southerton, D. 2006. Analysing the temporal organization of daily life: Social constraints, practices and their allocation. Sociology 40 (3): 435–454.
Spurling, N. 2010. Authors of our own lives? Individuals, institutions and the everyday practice of sociology. Lancaster: Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.
Walker, G. 2014. The dynamics of energy demand: Change, rhythm and synchronicity. Energy Research & Social Science 1 (0): 49–55.
Warde, A. 2005. Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture 5 (2): 131–153.
West, C., and D.H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & Society 1 (2): 125–151.
Wharton, A. 2012. The sociology of gender. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Acknowledgements
This research received funding from the Irish Research Council Postgraduate Scholarship Scheme (2013–2016). The author also wishes to express thanks to all participants who were involved in this research, which was conducted with a sample who participated in the CONSENSUS Project: ‘A cross border household analysis of consumption, environment and sustainability’ (http://www.consensus.ie), funded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Science, Technology, Research and Innovation for the Environment (STRIVE) Programme 2007–2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greene, M. (2018). Paths, Projects and Careers of Domestic Practice: Exploring Dynamics of Demand over Biographical Time. In: Hui, A., Day, R., Walker, G. (eds) Demanding Energy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61991-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61991-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61990-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61991-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)