Skip to main content

Conservation Jujutsu, or How Conservation NGOs Use Market Forces to Save Nature from Markets in Southern Chile

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Anthropology of Conservation NGOs

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability ((PSAS))

Abstract

Much of the anthropological literature on conservation nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) in recent years has explored their interactions with markets and corporations. A key part of this debate has considered the extent to which NGOs see using market mechanisms and engaging with corporations as a positive force for conservation, or as a necessary evil in a market- and corporation-dominated world, or a mix of the two positions. The purpose of this chapter is to explore these debates through a review of the work of conservation NGOs in Chile. In the last few decades, two key features of Chile’s political economy have been the dominance of market mechanisms and an economy built on the export of natural resources, controlled by a few firms and industries. In this time, international conservation NGOs have greatly increased their presence in Chile, with much of their work focussing on establishing and supporting private protected areas. This engagement has been facilitated by regulations that facilitate purchase of land by outside investors, measures originally introduced to encourage foreign investment in industries that exploited natural resources. Measures originally created to facilitate environmentally damaging industries, such as forestry and mining, are now used by those seeking to preserve nature. This raises the question of whether these NGOs see markets as a positive force for conservation in southern Chile, or whether they are engaged in an act of conservation Jujutsu—using mechanisms created to facilitate markets in environmentally damaging industries to save the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blanchard, L., C.G. Sandbrook, J.A. Fisher, and B. Vira. 2016. Investigating the Consistency of a Pro-market Perspective Amongst Conservation Professionals: Evidence from Two Q Methodological Studies. Conservation and Society 14 (2): 112–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockington, D., and R. Duffy. 2010. Capitalism and Conservation: The Production and Reproduction of Biodiversity Conservation. Antipode 42 (3): 469–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockington, D., and K. Scholfield. 2010. Expenditure by Conservation Nongovernmental Organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa. Conservation Letters 3 (1): 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosius, J.P., and L.M. Campbell. 2011. Collaborative Event Ethnography: Conservation and Development Trade-offs at the Fourth World Conservation Congress. Conservation and Society 8 (4): 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büscher, B., S. Sullivan, K. Neves, J. Igoe, and D. Brockington. 2012. Towards a Synthesized Critique of Neoliberal Biodiversity Conservation. Capitalism Nature Socialism 23 (2): 4–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, D. 2001. Environmental Politics in Chile: Legacies of Dictatorship and Democracy. Third World Quarterly 22 (3): 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. 2008a. Neoliberalising Nature: Processes, Effects, and Evaluations. Environment & Planning A 40: 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008b. Neoliberalising Nature: The Logics of Deregulation and Reregulation. Environment & Planning A 40: 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corson, C. 2010. Shifting Environmental Governance in a Neoliberal World: US AID for Conservation. Antipode 42 (3): 576–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Fuente, A. 2010. El nuevo mapa de la conservación. Que pasa 11 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyon, S., and C. Sabinot. 2014. A New ‘Conservation Space’? Protected Areas, Environmental Economic Activities and Discourses in Two Yucatán Biosphere Reserves in Mexico. Conservation and Society 12 (2): 133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, W.H., P.X. To, and S. Mahanty. 2013. How Biodiversity Conservation Policy Accelerates Agrarian Differentiation: The Account of an Upland Village in Vietnam. Conservation and Society 11 (2): 130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J.A., and K. Brown. 2014. Ecosystem Services Concepts and Approaches in Conservation: Just a Rhetorical Tool? Ecological Economics 108: 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, R. 2010. Neoliberal Environmentality: Towards a Postructuralist Political Ecology of the Conservation Debate. Conservation and Society 8 (3): 71–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortwangler, C. 2007. Friends with Money: Private Support for a National Park in the US Virgin Islands. Conservation and Society 5 (4): 504–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, G. 2010. The Rich, the Powerful and the Endangered: Conservation Elites, Networks and the Dominican Republic. Antipode 42 (3): 624–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Conservation’s Friends in High Places: Neoliberalism, Networks, and the Transnational Conservation Elite. Global Environmental Politics 11 (4): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. What Role Do Private Protected Areas Have in Conserving Global Biodiversity?. SRI working papers (46).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Biodiversity for Billionaires: Capitalism, Conservation and the Role of Philanthropy in Saving/Selling Nature. Development and Change 43 (1): 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. What Is a Land Grab? Exploring Green Grabs, Conservation, and Private Protected Areas in Southern Chile. Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (4): 547–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Markets, Nature, Neoliberalism, and Conservation Through Private Protected Areas in Southern Chile. Environment & Planning A 47 (4): 850–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrabanski, M., C. Bidaud, J.-F. Le Coq, and P. Méral. 2013. Environmental NGOs, Policy Entrepreneurs of Market-Based Instruments for Ecosystem Services? A Comparison of Costa Rica, Madagascar and France. Forest Policy and Economics 37: 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humes, E. 2002. Eco Barons: The Dreamers, Schemers, and Millionaires Who Are Saving Our Planet. New York: Ecco/HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igoe, J., and D. Brockington. 2007. Neoliberal Conservation: A Brief Introduction. Conservation and Society 5 (4): 432–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igoe, J., and C. Fortwangler. 2007. Whither Communities and Conservation? International Journal of Biodiversity Science & Management 3 (2): 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igoe, J., K. Neves, and D. Brockington. 2010. A Spectacular Eco-Tour Around the Historic Bloc: Theorising the Convergence of Biodiversity Conservation and Capitalist Expansion. Antipode 42 (3): 486–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, K. 2001. Crimes against Nature: Squatters, Poachers, Thieves, and the Hidden History of American Conservation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose Tapia, M. and M. Muñoz. 2012. Tierras en Aysen duplican en valor por conservacionismo y proyectos electricos. La Tercera. 31 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P. 2014. New Conservation: Setting the Record Straight and Finding Common Ground. Conservation Biology 28 (3): 634–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P., C. Groves, and M. Marvier. 2014. Review: The Evolving Linkage Between Conservation Science and Practice at The Nature Conservancy. Journal of Applied Ecology 51 (5): 1137–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klubock, T. 2014. La Frontera: Forests and Ecological Conflict in Chile’s Frontier Territory. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lalasz, R., P. Kareiva, and M. Marvier. 2011. Conservation in the Anthropocene. Breakthrough Journal 2: 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latta, A., and B.E.C. Aguayo. 2012. Testing the Limits Neoliberal Ecologies from Pinochet to Bachelet. Latin American Perspectives 39 (4): 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, K. 2010. The Devil Is in the (Bio)diversity: Private Sector ‘Engagement‘ and the Restructuring of Biodiversity Conservation. Antipode 42 (3): 513–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbembé, J.-A. 2001. On the Postcolony. Stanford: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, K. 1999. Selling Nature to Save It? Biodiversity and Green Developmentalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17 (2): 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murat, A., and B. Büscher. 2012. Nature™ Inc.: Changes and Continuities in Neoliberal Conservation and Market-based Environmental Policy. Development and Change 43 (1): 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, W. 2002. From Dependency to Reform and Back Again: The Chilean Peasantry During the Twentieth Century. The Journal of Peasant Studies 29 (3–4): 190–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M., and G. Geisse. 2001. Las lecciones del caso Tompkins para la política ambiental y la inversión extranjera en Chile. Ambiente y desarrollo 17 (3): 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves, K. 2010. Cashing in on Cetourism: A Critical Ecological Engagement with Dominant E-NGO Discourses on Whaling, Cetacean Conservation, and Whale Watching. Antipode 42 (3): 719–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niklitschek, M.E. 2007. Trade Liberalization and Land Use Changes: Explaining the Expansion of Afforested Land in Chile. Forest Science 53 (3): 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., and A. Tickell. 2002. Neoliberalizing Space. Antipode 34 (3): 380–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pliscoff, P., and T. Fuentes-Castillo. 2011. Representativeness of Terrestrial Ecosystems in Chile’s Protected Area System. Environmental Conservation 38: 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.G. 2012. Common and Conflicting Interests in the Engagements Between Conservation Organizations and Corporations. Conservation Biology 26 (6): 967–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandbrook, C., I.R. Scales, B. Vira, and W.M. Adams. 2011. Value Plurality Among Conservation Professionals. Conservation Biology 25 (2): 285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepúlveda, C., and P. Villarroel. 2012. Swans, Conflicts, and Resonance: Local Movements and the Reform of Chilean Environmental Institutions. Latin American Perspectives 39 (4): 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soule, M. 2013. The ‘New Conservation’. Conservation Biology 27 (5): 895–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, M., and E. Chaves. 2006. The Nature Conservancy, the Press, and Accountability. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 35 (3): 345–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tecklin, D.R., and C. Sepulveda. 2014. The Diverse Properties of Private Land Conservation in Chile: Growth and Barriers to Private Protected Areas in a Market-friendly Context. Conservation and Society 12 (2): 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tecklin, D., C. Bauer, and M. Prieto. 2011. Making Environmental Law for the Market: The Emergence, Character, and Implications of Chile’s Environmental Regime. Environmental Politics 20 (6): 879–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdés, J.G. 1995. Pinochet’s Economists: The Chicago School of Economics in Chile. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Jones, S. 2012. Negotiating Neoliberalism: Conservationists’ Role in the Development of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Geoforum 43 (6): 1035–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holmes, G. (2018). Conservation Jujutsu, or How Conservation NGOs Use Market Forces to Save Nature from Markets in Southern Chile. In: Larsen, P., Brockington, D. (eds) The Anthropology of Conservation NGOs. Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60579-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60579-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60578-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60579-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics