Skip to main content

Knowledge in Organisations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

Abstract

This chapter clarifies the relationship between information, knowledge and competitiveness by introducing the model of the «knowledge ladder». Based on the knowledge ladder, the terms fields of action and the maturity model of KM are explained. The reader will learn about the conversion of tacit and explicit knowledge according to the SECI-Model while a case study demonstrates the power of story-telling. The issue of structuring and valuing knowledge as part of intangible assets of an organisation is also addressed and a knowledge-based theory of the firm is introduced. The KM tool described at the end of the chapter is the «idea competition».

A learning organisation is an organisation skilled at creating, acquiring and transferring knowledge and at modifying its behaviour to reflect new knowledge and insights David A. Garvin

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    A good overview over current KM maturity models is found at Kuriakose et al. (2010). See also Vanini and Bochert 2014 and 7 http://www.kmmm.org/, 7 http://wisdomsource.com/K3MOverview.pdf

  2. 2.

    Barney (1992), see also 7 http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_barney_resource_based_view_firm.html

References

  • Andreeva, T., & Kianto, A. (2012). Does knowledge management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(4), 617–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1992). Integrating organizational behaviour and strategy formulation research. Advances in Strategic Management, 8, 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N. (1996). There’s a price on your head: Managing intellectual capital strategically. Business Quarterly, 60(4), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collison, C., & Parcell, G. (2004). Learning to fly: practical knowledge management from leading and learning organizations. Chichester: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBI (Carnegie Bosch Institute). (1995). Knowledge in international corporations – Outline of research area. Pittsburg: CBI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L. (1997). The metanational corporation, vol 97/60, INSEAD (working paper). Fontainebleau: INSEAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital. New York: Harper Business/Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L., & Sullivan, P. (1996). Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. European Management Journal, 14(4), 356–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlach, C., Thier, K., & Neubauer, A. (2005). Story telling. Durch Geschichten zur Seele des Unternehmens. http://www.community-of-knowledge.de/pdf/Story_Telling_NARRATA.pdf, gesichtet 10.2.05.

  • Gardner, H. (1995). Leading minds: An anatomy of leadership. New York: Basic Books (Harper Collins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettier, E. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23(6), 121–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1996, Winter Special Issue), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Heene, A. (Eds.). (1994). Competence based competition. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, G., & Nonaka, I. (1993). Models of knowledge management in the West and Japan. In P. Lorange et al. (Eds.), Implementing strategic processes, change, learning and cooperation (pp. 117–144). London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired, 14 June. Available at http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html

  • Inkinen, H. (2016). Review of empirical research on knowledge management practices and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(2), 230–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itami, H., & Roehl, T. (1987). Mobilizing invisible assets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuriakose, K. K., Raj, B., SatyaMurty, S. A. V., & Swaminathan, P. (2010). Knowledge management maturity models – A morphological analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 11(3), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, F. (1997). Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69, 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, K., & Hornung, T. (2003). The benefits of knowledge management – Results of the German Award «Knowledge Manager 2002». Journal of Universal Computer Science, 9(6), 463–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, K., & Schmidt, A. (2004). Nutzenbeurteilung von Wissensmanagement. REFA-Nachr, 5(2004), 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, K., Reinhardt, R., & Schmidt, A. (2004). The benefits of knowledge management: Some empirical evidence. In B. Renzl, et al. (Ed.), OKLC5 - Proceedings of the fifth european conference on organizational knowledge, learning, and capabilities (Track: A managing organizational knowledge and competence.), 2–3 April, 2004, University of Innsbruck, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Intellectual assets and value creation. Synthesis report. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/40637101.pdf.

  • Pawlowsky, P., & Schmid, S. (2012). Interrelations between strategic orientation, knowledge management, innovation and performance. Empirical findings from a national survey in Germany. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 5, 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J. (1994). The Tom Peters seminar. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. (1994). Foreword. In G. Hamel & A. Heene (Eds.), Competence based competition (pp. XV–XIX). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCANDIA. (1998). Human capital in transformation (Intellectual capital prototype report). Stockholm: Skandia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J.-C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler. http://www.sveiby.com.au.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 4, 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (2009). Dynamic capabilities & strategic management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. In G. Dosi, R. R. Nelson, & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities (pp. 334–362). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanini, U., & Bochert, S. (2014). An empirical investigation of maturity levels in knowledge management. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(4), 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hipple, E. (1994). “Sticky information” and the focus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40, 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G., & Roos, J. (1996). Five claims on knowing. European Management Journal, 14(4), 423–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zack, M., McKeen, J., & Singh, S. (2009) Knowledge management and organizational performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13, 392–409.

    Google Scholar 

Sources/links:

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

North, K., Kumta, G. (2018). Knowledge in Organisations. In: Knowledge Management. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59978-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics