Abstract
This chapter focuses on actions at the heart of the STEPWISE framework. Utilising a discursive psychological perspective less usual in science education than cognitive psychology, this chapter investigates preservice teachers’ sense of responsibility for education for sustainability (EfS) or pro-environmental action. Unlike cognitive psychology, the discursive approach acknowledges cultural and relational aspects of any action in the social world and no distinction is made between social and psychological phenomena. Using a coding system developed around the Grammar of Agency, we present findings from our preservice teachers’ development as applied scientifically literate citizens to show how their pro-environmental engagement is limited to individualistic positioning . There may be implications for EfS studies, STEPWISE and other sociopolitical and STSE projects self-reflecting about the cognitive psychological assumptions that depict individual minds and knowledge as separated from their social realisation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Dr. Caroline Smith originally designed the Eco Challenge in 2008. It has since been adapted.
References
Anderson, K., & Zuiker, S. (2010). Performative identity as a resource for classroom participation: Scientific Shane vs. Jimmy Neutron. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 9(5), 291–309.
Arnold, J. (2010, July). Identity projects and practice in a science classroom: A case study of sudents’ reflexive positioning. Paper presented at Australasian Science Education Research Association annual conference, Port Stephens, Queensland.
Arnold, J. (2012). Science students’ classroom discourse: Tasha’s umwelt. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 233–259.
Arnold, J., & Clarke, D. (2014). What is ‘agency’?: Perspectives in science education Research. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 735–754.
Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA) (2010). Sustainability curriculum framework. Commonwealth of Australia.
Basu, S. (2008). How students design and enact physics lessons: Five immigrant Caribbean youth and the cultivation of student voice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 881–899.
Bencze, L. (2014). ‘STEPWISE’: Science & technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies & environments. A summary for science teachers. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto. Available at: http://webspace.oise.utoronto.ca/~benczela/STEPWISE.html.
Bencze, L. (in press). Student-led learning for ‘altruistic’ socio-political actions. In B. Shapiro (Ed.), Actions of their own to learn (pp. xx–xx). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Burris, V. (2001). Small business, status politics, and the social base of new Christian right activism. Critical Sociology, 27(1), 29–55.
Carter, L. (2012). Investigating preservice science teachers’ preferences in developing pro-environmental engagement. Paper presented at the XVth International Organisation for Science and Technology Education symposium Hammamet, Tunisia, 29th October–3rd November, 2012.
Carter, L., Castano, C. & Jones, M. (in press). Sociopolitical activism and transformative learning: Expanding the discourse about what counts in science education. In L. Bryan, & K. Tobin (Eds.), Science education as a political issue: What’s missing in the public conversation about science education? (pp. xx–xx). New York: Peter Lang.
Chawla, L. (2006). Research methods to investigate significant life experiences: Review and recommendations. Environmental Education Research, 12(3), 359–374.
Crowell, A., & Schunn, C. (2014). Scientifically literate action: Key barriers and facilitators across context and content. Public Understanding of Science, 23(6), 718–733.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63.
Harré, R. (1984). Personal being: A theory for individual psychology. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell Publishers Limited.
Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). The dynamics of social episodes. In R. Harré, & L. V. Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 23–260.
Martin, J., & Carter, L. (2015). Preservice teacher agency concerning education for sustainability (EfS): A discursive psychological approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 560–573.
Muhlhaüsler, P., & Harré, R. (1990). Pronouns and people. Oxford: Blackwell.
Palmer, J., Suggate, J., Robottom, I., & Hart, P. (1999). Significant life experiences and formative influences on the development of adults’ environmental awareness in the UK, Australia and Canada. Environmental Education Research, 5(2), 181–200.
Preston, L. (2011). Green pedagogy – guidance and doubt in teaching outdoor and environmental education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 367–380.
Robelia, B. A., Greenhow, C., & Burton, L. (2011). Environmental learning in online social networks: adopting environmentally responsible behaviors. Environmental Education Research, 17(4), 553–575.
Sauvé, L. (2005). Currents in environmental education – Mapping a complex and evolving pedagogical field. The Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 11–37.
Sharma, A. (2007). Making (electrical) connections: Exploring student agency in a school in India. Science Education, 92(2), 297–319.
Seah, L., Clarke, D., & Hart, C. (2011). Understanding students’ language use about expansion through analyzing their lexicogrammatical resources. Science Education, 95(5), 852–876.
Wood, L., & Kroger, R. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Yerrick, R. K., & Gilbert, A. (2011). Constraining the discourse community: How science discourse perpetuates marginalization of underrepresented students. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 6(1), 67–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carter, L., Martin, J. (2017). “I Had to Take Action Straight Away.” Preservice Teachers’ Accounts of Pro-environmental Action. In: Bencze, L. (eds) Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55503-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55505-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)