Skip to main content

Decolonizing the Lifeworld of Death

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Death Café Movement
  • 451 Accesses

Abstract

In our final chapter, I aim to amalgamate all important concepts provided by scholars presented in the monograph for a final reading of the Death Café’s phenomenon as a social movement. With pride of place still given to Habermas’s theory of communicative action, I also hope to show how the amalgamation of communicative action concepts underpin a death identity. In this regard, I remind readers that we are witnessing a decolonizing of the lifeworld through Death Café renderings of life and death. I note how such a decolonization through Death Cafés serve to articulate our shared humanity in an age of divisive identity politics. The closing sections of our final chapter elaborates on sociologist Anthony Giddens’s views about the catalytic aspects of social risk that propel participants toward responding to an increasingly precarious society. The desire to engage with risk calculations can be seen as a set of factors that motivate Café attendees to mitigate risks by collectively engaging in death talk. To understand their efforts as a movement, a condensed review of social movement literature is undertaken. By conducting a social movement literature review that took place during the last chapter allows the literature to function as a crescendo for the efforts of Café participants, all of whom are framed as movement activists in this work. The chapter closes on a positive note, reminding readers that the Death Café ultimately returns us to life and living.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford, Robert D. 1993a. “‘You Could be the Hundredth Monkey’: Collective Action Frames and Vocabularies of Motive Within the Nuclear Disarmament Movement.” Sociological Quarterly 34(2) 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benford, Robert D. 1993b. “Frame Disputes within the Nuclear Disarmament Movement.” Social Forces 71: 677–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bever, Lindsey. 2016. “A Terminally Ill Woman Had One Rule at Her End-of-Life Party: No Crying.” The Washington Post. Website accessed on August 29, 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2016/08/16/a-terminally-ill-woman-had-one-rule-at-her-end-of-life-party-no-crying/

  • Boyte, Harry C. 1977. “The Populist Challenge: Anatomy of an Emergent Movement.” Socialist Review 32: 39–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, Valerie, and Sharon Wolchik. 2006. “Favorable Conditions and Electoral Revolutions.” Journal of Democracy 17(4): 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, John Brown. 2003. Transcommunality: Fro the Politics of Conversion to the Ethics of Respect. Philadelphia: Temple of University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, Elisabeth. 1997. The People’s Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890-1925. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costain, Anne N. 1992. Inviting Women’s Rebellion; A Political Process Interpretation of the Women’s Movement. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Jenkins J., and Bert Klandermans. 1995. “The Politics of Social Protest.” In The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements, edited by J. Craig Jenkins and Bert Klandermans, 1–13. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, Andrew. 2015. “In U.S., Support Up for Doctor-Assisted Suicide.” http://Gallup.com. WEBSITE accessed on October 11, 2015. http://www.gallup.com/poll/183425/support-doctor-assisted-suicide.aspx.

  • Enrique, Laraña, Hank Johnston, and Joseph R. Gusfield. 1994. New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esinger, Peter K. 1973. “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities.” American Political Science Review 81: 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esman, Milton J. 1994. Ethnic Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William. 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William, and David Meyer. 1996. “The Framing of Political Opportunity.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy and Mayer N. Zald, 275–279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1990. Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony, and Christopher Pierson. 1998. Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making Sense of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, Jack. 2004. “More Social Movements or Fewer? Beyond Political Opportunity Structures to Relational Fields.” Theory and Society 33(3/4): 333–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. “New Social Movement.” Telos 49: 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1986. “The New Obscurity: The Crisis of the Welfare State and the Exhaustion of Utopian Energies.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 11: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Henry. 2006. “Democracy or Autocracy on the March? The Color Revolutions as Nomal Dynamics of Patronal Presidentialism.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39(3): 305–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, James M. 1997. The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Hank, Enrique Laraña, and Joseph R. Gusfield. 1994. “Identities, Grievances, and New Social Movements.” In New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, edited by Enrique Laraña, Hank Johnston and Joseph R. Gusfield, 3–35. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 16: 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, Ruud. 1996. “New Social Movements and Changes in Political Participation in Western Europe.” West European Politics 19: 28–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter, Ruud Koopmans, Jan W. Duyvendak, and Marco G. Giugni. 1992. “New Social Movements and Political Opportunities in Western Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 22: 219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter, Ruud Koopmans, Jan W. Duyvendak, and Marco G. Giugni. 1995. The Politics of New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1996. “The Organizational Structure of New Social Movements in a Political Context.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, edited by Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer Zald, 152–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzman, Charles. 1996. “Structural Opportunity and Perceived Opportunity in Social-Movement Theory: The Iranian Revolution of 1979.” American Sociological Review 61 (February): 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Su H. 2007. Debating New Social Movements. Lanham: University Press of America, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Gary, and McAdam Doug. 1996. “Social Movement and the Changing Structure of Political Opportunity in the European Union.” West European Politics 19(2): 249–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, Brittany. 2014. “My Right to Death with Dignity at 29.” CNN. Website accessed December 22, 2015. http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/07/opinion/maynard-assisted-suicide-cancer-dignity/

  • McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John D., and Mayer N. Zald. 1973. The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization. Morristown, N.J: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John D., and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82: 1212–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, Alberto. 1980. “The New Social Movements: A Theoretical Approach.” Social Science Information 19: 199–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, Alberto. 1985. “The Symbolic Challenge of Contemporary Movements.” Social Research 52: 789–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, Alberto. 1989. Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, Alberto. 1994. “A Strange Kind of Newness: What’s ‘New’ in New Social Movements?” In New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, edited by Enrique Larana, Hank Gusfield and Joseph R. Gusfield, 101–130. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, Alberto. 1996. Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, David S. 2004. “Protest and Political Opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, David S., and Debra C. Minkoff. 2004. “Conceptualizing Political Opportunity.” Social Forces 82(4): 1457–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad, Sharon Erickson. 2011. Nonviolent Revolutions: Civil Resistance in the Late 20th Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noack, Rick. 2015. “Multiculturalism is a Sham, Says Angela Merkel.” Washington Post. WEBSITE accessed on August 17, 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/12/14/angela-merkel-multiculturalism-is-a-sham/.

  • Rucht, Dieter. 1996. “The Impact of National Contexts on Social Movement Structures: A Cross-Movement and Cross-National Perspective.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, edited by Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy and Mayer Zald, 185–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A., and Sarah A. Soule. 2010. A Primer on Social Movements. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sidney. 1989. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965–1975. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilisation to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, Alain. 1985. “An Introduction to the Study of Social Movements.” Social Research 52(4): 749–787.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fong, J. (2017). Decolonizing the Lifeworld of Death. In: The Death Café Movement. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54256-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54256-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54255-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54256-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics