Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical Considerations in Children with Corneal Opacities and Cataracts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Management of Childhood Glaucoma

  • 426 Accesses

Abstract

In the past, pediatric corneal opacities have been grouped into congenital and acquired causes. We discuss corneal opacities and group them based on the treatment, including penetrating keratoplasty, endothelial keratoplasty, and optical iridectomy. Modern surgery for pediatric corneal opacities is following the trend in adult corneal surgery, namely, to replace only the diseased corneal layers. Little definitive surgical advice can be easily gleaned from prior publications on pediatric penetrating keratoplasty, due to the inclusion of diverse patients, techniques, and surgical timing. Visual development, or the lack of it – deprivation amblyopia – is an ever-present issue for the pediatric corneal surgeon, in contrast to the surgical considerations of adult corneal opacity. Each of the three above modalities has its distinct pros and cons in children. For example, while pediatric endothelial keratoplasty requires fewer examinations under anesthesia for suture removal, fewer suture-related complications, and less induced astigmatism compared with penetrating keratoplasty, surgery in children must be altered from the adult technique due to the child’s shallower anterior chamber and relative positive posterior pressure. Optical iridectomy should be considered when the central opacity is associated with at least several millimeters of clear peripheral cornea. The treatment of pediatric corneal opacities, while challenging, can bring tremendous rewards, especially when the relatively recent techniques of selective corneal replacement may be applied. This chapter discusses surgical treatment options for pediatric corneal opacities, including penetrating, endothelial, and lamellar keratoplasties. Attention will also be given to the use of Boston keratoprostheses as well as a less frequent, but highly valuable, optical iridectomy. The management of coincident glaucoma will also be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dana MR, Moyes AL, Gomes JAP, Rosheim KM, Schaumberg DA, Laibson PR, et al. The indications for and outcome in pediatric keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(8):1129–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Low JR, Anshu A, Tan AC, Htoon HM, Tan DT. The outcomes of primary pediatric keratoplasty in Singapore. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(3):496–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Trief D, Marquezan MC, Rapuano CJ, Prescott CR. Pediatric corneal transplants. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep;28(5):477–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lowe MT, Keane MC, Coster DJ, Williams KA. The outcome of corneal transplantation in infants, children, and adolescents. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(3):492–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang LL, Lambert SR, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Long-term results of corneal graft survival in infants and children with peters anomaly. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(4):833–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Michaeli A, Markovich A, Rootman DS. Corneal transplants for the treatment of congenital corneal opacities. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2005;42(1):34–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vajpayee RB, Vanathi M, Tandon R, Sharma N, Titiyal JS. Keratoplasty for keratomalacia in preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(5):538–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rao KV, Fernandes M, Gangopadhyay N, Vemuganti GK, Krishnaiah S, Sangwan VS. Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty for Peters anomaly. Cornea. 2008;27(7):749–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Ghamdi A, Al-Rajhi A, Wagoner MD. Primary pediatric keratoplasty: indications, graft survival, and visual outcome. J AAPOS. 2007;11(1):41–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang JW, Kim MK, Kim JH, Kim SJ, Wee WR, Yu YS. Long-term visual outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty for Peters anomaly. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(3):953–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cowden JW. Penetrating keratoplasty in infants and children. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(3):324–8. discussion 8-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Karadag R, Chan TC, Azari AA, Nagra PK, Hammersmith KM, Rapuano CJ. Survival of primary penetrating keratoplasty in children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;171:95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Majander A, Kivela TT, Krootila K. Indications and outcomes of keratoplasties in children during a 40-year period. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(6):618–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel HY, Ormonde S, Brookes NH, Moffatt LS, McGhee CN. The indications and outcome of paediatric corneal transplantation in New Zealand: 1991-2003. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(4):404–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stulting RD, Sumers KD, Cavanagh HD, Waring GO 3rd, Gammon JA. Penetrating keratoplasty in children. Ophthalmology. 1984;91(10):1222–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhandari R, Ferri S, Whittaker B, Liu M, Lazzaro DR. Peters anomaly: review of the literature. Cornea. 2011;30(8):939–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang C, O'Hara M, Mannis MJ. Primary pediatric keratoplasty: indications and outcomes. Cornea. 2009;28(9):1003–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beauchamp GR. Pediatric keratoplasty: problems in management. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1979;16(6):388–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Rajhi AA, Wagoner MD. Penetrating keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(6):956–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jonas JB, Rank RM, Budde WM. Autologous ipsilateral rotating penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131(4):427–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fernandez MM, Buckley EG, Afshari NA. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in a child. J AAPOS. 2008;12(3):314–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeng BH, Marcotty A, Traboulsi EI. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in a 2-year-old child. J AAPOS. 2008;12(3):317–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Busin M, Beltz J, Scorcia V. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(9):1140–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Caldwell MC, Afshari NA, Decroos FC, Proia AD. The histology of graft adhesion in descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(2):277–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K. Non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for endothelial dysfunction secondary to argon laser iridotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(4):543–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Price FW Jr, Price MO. Endothelial keratoplasty to restore clarity to a failed penetrating graft. Cornea. 2006;25(8):895–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Anwar HM, El-Danasoury A. Endothelial keratoplasty in children. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25(4):340–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ashar JN, Ramappa M, Vaddavalli PK. Paired-eye comparison of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in children with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(10):1247–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gonnermann J, Klamann MK, Maier AK, Bertelmann E, Schroeter J, von Au K, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in a child with corneal endothelial dysfunction in Kearns-Sayre syndrome. Cornea. 2014;33(11):1232–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aquavella JV, Gearinger MD, Akpek EK, McCormick GJ. Pediatric keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(5):989–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nguyen P, Chopra V. Glaucoma management in Boston keratoprosthesis type I recipients. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25(2):134–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rachitskaya AV, Moysidis SN, Miller D, Perez VL, Banitt MR, Alfonso EC, et al. Streptococcal endophthalmitis in pediatric keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(7):1506–7 e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fung SSM, Jabbour S, Harissi-Dagher M, Tan RRG, Hamel P, Baig K, et al. Visual outcomes and complications of type i Boston keratoprosthesis in children: a retrospective multicenter study and literature review. Ophthalmology. 2018 Feb;125(2):153–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Foster J. Optical iridectomy, indications, method and value. Br J Ophthalmol. 1932;16(8):476–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Agarwal T, Jhanji V, Dutta P, Tandon R, Sharma N, Titiyal JS, et al. Automated vitrector-assisted optical iridectomy: customized iridectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(6):959–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sundaresh K, Jethani J, Vijayalakshmi P. Optical iridectomy in children with corneal opacities. J AAPOS. 2008;12(2):163–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Alexander Foster, Anne Ko & Michael R. Banitt

Authors
  1. Alexander Foster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael R. Banitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Banitt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Samuel & Ethel Balkan International Pediatric Glaucoma Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA

    Alana L. Grajewski

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Elena Bitrian

  3. Glaucoma Service Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK

    Maria Papadopoulos

  4. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

    Sharon F. Freedman

Electronic Supplementary Material

Surgical video with narration demonstrating optical iridectomy in Peters anomaly (WMV 138729 kb)

Ab externo 360° trabeculotomy , lysis of iridocorneal adhesions, and temporal optical sector iridectomy using illuminated catheter in a child with Peters anomaly. (Courtesy of Alana L. Grajewski, MD) (MP4 227526 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Foster, A., Ko, A., Banitt, M.R. (2018). Surgical Considerations in Children with Corneal Opacities and Cataracts. In: Grajewski, A., Bitrian, E., Papadopoulos, M., Freedman, S. (eds) Surgical Management of Childhood Glaucoma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54003-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54003-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54002-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54003-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation