Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Open Abdomen pp 247–256Cite as

Biological Prosthesis for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1049 Accesses

Part of the book series: Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma ((HTACST))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Miller RS, Morris JA, Diaz JJ, Herring MB, May AK. Complications after 344 damage-control open celiotomies. J Trauma. 2005;59(6):1365–74. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16394910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, Reed WP. Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg. 1998;133(4):378–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mathes SJ, Steinwald PM, Foster RD, Hoffman WY, Anthony JP. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a comparison of flap and mesh closure. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):586–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Quyn AJ, Johnston C, Hall D, Chambers A, Arapova N, Ogston S, et al. The open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure systems - historical evolution and systematic review. Color Dis. 2012;14(8):e429–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sartelli M, Coccolini F, van Ramshorst GH, Campanelli G, Mandalà V, Ansaloni L, et al. WSES guidelines for emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias. World J Emerg Surg. 2013;8(1):50. Available from: http://wjes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1749-7922-8-50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dinsmore RC, Calton WC, Harvey SB, Blaney MW. Prevention of adhesions to polypropylene mesh in a traumatized bowel model. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(2):131–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10945355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van’t Riet M, de Vos van Steenwijk PJ, Bonthuis F, Marquet RL, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, et al. Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh: comparison of different barriers using an incisional hernia model. Ann Surg. 2003;237(1):123–8. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1513975&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Konstantinovic ML, Lagae P, Zheng F, Verbeken EK, De Ridder D, Deprest JA. Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112(11):1554–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown GL, Richardson JD, Malangoni MA, Tobin GR, Ackerman D, Polk HC. Comparison of prosthetic materials for abdominal wall reconstruction in the presence of contamination and infection. Ann Surg. 1985;201(6):705–11. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3159353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rasilainen SK, Juhani MP, Kalevi LA. Microbial colonization of open abdomen in critically ill surgical patients. World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10:25. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4487573&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Stannard JP, Robinson JT, Anderson ER, McGwin G, Volgas DA, Alonso JE. Negative pressure wound therapy to treat hematomas and surgical incisions following high-energy trauma. J Trauma. 2006;60(6):1301–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andros G, Armstrong DG, Attinger CE, Boulton AJM, Frykberg RG, Joseph WS, et al. Consensus statement on negative pressure wound therapy (V.A.C. Therapy) for the management of diabetic foot wounds. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006;(Suppl):1–32. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17007488.

  13. Cornwell KG, Landsman A, James KS. Extracellular matrix biomaterials for soft tissue repair. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2009;26:507–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bellows CF, Smith A, Hodde J, Hiles M. Tissue engineering in abdominal wall surgery. Minerva Chir. 2011;66(2):129–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Badylak SF. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Transpl Immunol. 2004;12:367–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Winters JC. Inte Xen tissue processing and laboratory study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(Suppl. 7):34–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smart NJ, Bryan N, Hunt JA, Daniels IR. Porcine dermis implants in soft-tissue reconstruction: current status. Biol: Targets Ther. 2014;8:83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF, et al. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery. 2010;148(3):544–58. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Coccolini F, Agresta F, Bassi A, Catena F, Crovella F, Ferrara R, et al. Italian Biological Prosthesis Work-Group (IBPWG): proposal for a decisional model in using biological prosthesis. World J Emerg Surg. 2012;7(1):34. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3507693&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Eriksson A, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia. 2014;18(1):31–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chand B, Indeck M, Needleman B, Finnegan M, Van Sickle KR, Ystgaard B, et al. A retrospective study evaluating the use of Permacol™ surgical implant in incisional and ventral hernia repair. Int J Surg. 2014;12(4):296–303. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Holihan JL, Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Mo J, Kao LS, Liang MK. Mesh location in open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2015;40(1):89–99. Available from: doi:10.1007/s00268-015-3252-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Petter-Puchner AH, Dietz UA. Biological implants in abdominal wall repair. Br J Surg. 2013;100(8):987–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Montori G, Coccolini F, Manfredi R, Ceresoli M, Campanati L, Magnone S, et al. One year experience of swine dermal non-crosslinked collagen prostheses for abdominal wall repairs in elective and emergency surgery. World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10(1):28. Available from: http://www.wjes.org/content/10/1/28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Booth JH, Garvey PB, Baumann DP, Selber JC, Nguyen AT, Clemens MW, et al. Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(6):999–1009. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24083910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdelfatah MM, Rostambeigi N, Podgaetz E, Sarr MG. Long-term outcomes (>5-year follow-up) with porcine acellular dermal matrix (Permacol™) in incisional hernias at risk for infection. Hernia. 2015;19(1):135–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Richmond B, Ubert A, Judhan R, King J, Harrah T, Dyer B, et al. Component separation with porcine acellular dermal reinforcement is superior to traditional bridged mesh repairs in the open repair of significant midline ventral hernia defects. Am Surg. 2014;80(8):725–31. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25105388.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Primus FE, Harris HW. A critical review of biologic mesh use in ventral hernia repairs under contaminated conditions. Hernia. 2013;17:21–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Gurrado A, Franco IF, Lissidini G, Greco G, De Fazio M, Pasculli A, et al. Impact of pericardium bovine patch (Tutomesh®) on incisional hernia treatment in contaminated or potentially contaminated fields: retrospective comparative study. Hernia. 2015;19(2):259–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Moya MA, Dunham M, Inaba K, Bahouth H, Alam HB, Sultan B, et al. Long-term outcome of acellular dermal matrix when used for large traumatic open abdomen. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2008;65(2):349–53. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00005373-200808000-00013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ginting N, Tremblay L, Kortbeek JB. Surgisis® in the management of the complex abdominal wall in trauma: a case series and review of the literature. Injury. 2010;41(9):970–3. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.injury.2010.01.099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Patton JH, Berry S, Kralovich KA. Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions. Am J Surg. 2007;193(3):360–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Maurice SM, Skeete DA. Use of human acellular dermal matrix for abdominal wall reconstructions. Am J Surg. 2009;197(1):35–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lin HJ, Spoerke N, Deveney C, Martindale R. Reconstruction of complex abdominal wall hernias using acellular human dermal matrix: a single institution experience. Am J Surg. 2009;197(5):599–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Diaz JJ, Conquest AM, Ferzoco SJ, Vargo D, Miller P, Wu Y-C, et al. Multi-institutional experience using human acellular dermal matrix for ventral hernia repair in a compromised surgical field. Arch Surg. 2009;144(3):209–15. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19289658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee EI, Chike-Obi CJ, Gonzalez P, Garza R, Leong M, Subramanian A, et al. Abdominal wall repair using human acellular dermal matrix: a follow-up study. Am J Surg. 2009;198(5):650–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pomahac B, Aflaki P. Use of a non-cross-linked porcine dermal scaffold in abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2010;199(1):22–7. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.12.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Catena F, Ansaloni L, D’Alessandro L, Pinna A. Adverse effects of porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) implants in experimental ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(4):690. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17180262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ansaloni L, Catena F, Coccolini F, Gazzotti F, D’Alessandro L, Pinna AD. Inguinal hernia repair with porcine small intestine submucosa: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein’s repair with polypropylene mesh versus surgisis inguinal hernia matrix. Am J Surg. 2009;198(3):303–12. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19285658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Catena F, Ansaloni L, Di Saverio S, Cocccolini F, Vallicelli C, Lazzareschi D, et al. Use of porcine small intestine submucosa prostheses in contaminated hernia repair. ANZ J Surg. 2011;81(7–8):576–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22295421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ansaloni L, Catena F, Gagliardi S, Gazzotti F, D’Alessandro L, Pinna AD. Hernia repair with porcine small-intestinal submucosa. Hernia. 2007;11(4):321–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17443270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Montori G, Coccolini F, Ceresoli M, Catena F, Colaianni N, Poletti E, et al. The treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in advanced gastric cancer: state of the art. Int J Surg Oncol. 2014;2014:1–7. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84897811117&partnerID=40&md5=d080558edaf0b215ee713b0f09e900ad.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Catena F, Ansaloni L, Leone A, De Cataldis A, Gagliardi S, Gazzotti F, et al. Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia with Surgisis inguinal hernia matrix soft-tissue graft in immunodepressed patients. Hernia. 2005;9(1):29–31. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15378399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Coccolini F, Catena F, Bertuzzo VR, Ercolani G, Pinna A, Ansaloni L. Abdominal wall defect repair with biological prosthesis in transplanted patients: single center retrospective analysis and review of the literature. Updat Surg. 2013;65(3):191–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23636834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA. A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Ann Surg. 2013;257(6):991–6. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00000658-201306000-00001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Beale EW, Hoxworth RE, Livingston EH, Trussler AP. The role of biologic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review of the current literature. Am J Surg. 2012;204(4):510–7. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bellows CF, Smith A, Malsbury J, Helton WS. Repair of incisional hernias with biological prosthesis: a systematic review of current evidence. Am J Surg. 2013;205(1):85–101. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.02.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sharrock AE, Barker T, Yuen HM, Rickard R, Tai N. Management and closure of the open abdomen after damage control laparotomy for trauma. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2015;47(2):296–306. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Atema JJ, de Vries FEE, Boermeester MA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the repair of potentially contaminated and contaminated abdominal wall defects. Am J Surg. 2016:1–14. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Performance of biologic mesh materials in abdominal wall reconstruction - a randomized controlled trial. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02703662 accessed 25 August 2016.

  51. A prospective randomized trial of biologic mesh versus synthetic mesh for the repair of complex ventral hernias. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02451176 accessed 25 August 2016.

  52. Randomized control trial of biologic mesh (Xen MATRIXTM) vs. component separation alone in contaminated ventral hernia repair: a pilot study. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01295125 accessed 25 August 2016.

  53. A randomized, prospective, double blind clinical trial of non-cross-linked porcine dermis vs. bioabsorbable synthetic mesh for the repair of abdominal wall defects in at-risk patients. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01794338 accessed 25 August 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  54. PROPHYlactic Implantation of BIOlogic Mesh in Peritonitis (PROPHYBIOM). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02277262 accessed 25 August 2016.

  55. Prospective trial comparing the performance profiles of two non-cross-linked porcine dermal matrices in abdominal wall reconstruction. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02228889 accessed 25 August 2016.

  56. Use of biological mesh versus standard wound care in infected incisional ventral hernias: a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the SIMBIOSE Study. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01594450 accessed 25 August 2016.

  57. A prospective randomized trial of biologic mesh versus synthetic mesh for the repair of complex ventral hernias. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01746316 accessed 25 August 2016.

  58. Multicentric prospective randomized study comparing technique of tension-free repair with placement of a bovine pericardium bioprosthesis (Tutopatch® and Tutomesh®) to current conventional surgical techniques in potentially contaminated hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01073072 accessed 25 August 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Piazza OMS 1, 24127, Bergamo, Italy

    Marco Ceresoli

  2. General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, FC, Italy

    Federico Coccolini & Luca Ansaloni

  3. Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy

    Massimo Sartelli

  4. Unit of General Surgery - Day Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant’Ambrogio, Milano, Italy

    Giampiero Campanelli

  5. Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy

    Fausto Catena

Authors
  1. Marco Ceresoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Federico Coccolini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luca Ansaloni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Massimo Sartelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giampiero Campanelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fausto Catena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Ceresoli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy

    Federico Coccolini

  2. General Surgery, Virginia Commonvealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA

    Rao Ivatury

  3. Letterkenny General Hospital, Letterkenny, Donegal, Ireland

    Michael Sugrue

  4. General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy

    Luca Ansaloni

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ceresoli, M., Coccolini, F., Ansaloni, L., Sartelli, M., Campanelli, G., Catena, F. (2018). Biological Prosthesis for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. In: Coccolini, F., Ivatury, R., Sugrue, M., Ansaloni, L. (eds) Open Abdomen. Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48072-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48072-5_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48071-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48072-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation