Skip to main content

Autologous Fascial Sling for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Native Tissue Repair for Incontinence and Prolapse

Abstract

The autologous fascia pubovaginal sling remains an excellent choice for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI), nearly four decades after it was first popularized. We contend that the autologous sling should be offered to all women considering surgical treatment for SUI as one of several available options. As one might expect, proper technique and training is required for an optimal outcome. This chapter focuses on indications, proper surgical technique, postoperative care, outcomes and adverse events of this procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mock S, Angelle J, Reynolds WS, et al. Contemporary comparison between retropubic midurethral sling and autologous pubovaginal sling for stress urinary incontinence after the FDA advisory notification. Urology. 2015;85:321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zoorob D, Karram M. Role of autologous bladder-neck slings: a urogynecology perspective. Urol Clin North Am. 2012;39:311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolf Jr JS, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, et al. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol. 2008;179:1379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Forrest JB, Clemens JQ, Finamore P, et al. AUA Best Practice Statement for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing urologic surgery. J Urol. 2009;181:1170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bang SL, Belal M. Autologous pubovaginal slings: back to the future or a lost art? Res Rep Urol. 2016;8:11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaufman MR. Contemporary role of autologous fascial bladder neck slings: a urology perspective. Urol Clin North Am. 2012;39:317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown SL, Govier FE. Cadaveric versus autologous fascia lata for the pubovaginal sling: surgical outcome and patient satisfaction. J Urol. 2000;164:1633.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hassouna ME, Ghoniem GM. Long-term outcome and quality of life after modified pubovaginal sling for intrinsic sphincteric deficiency. Urology. 1999;53:287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wright EJ, Iselin CE, Carr LK, et al. Pubovaginal sling using cadaveric allograft fascia for the treatment of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. J Urol. 1998;160:759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaikin DC, Rosenthal J, Blaivas JG. Pubovaginal fascial sling for all types of stress urinary incontinence: long-term analysis. J Urol. 1998;160:1312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Haab F, Trockman BA, Zimmern PE, et al. Results of pubovaginal sling for the treatment of intrinsic sphincteric deficiency determined by questionnaire analysis. J Urol. 1997;158:1738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Govier FE, Gibbons RP, Correa RJ, et al. Pubovaginal slings using fascia lata for the treatment of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. J Urol. 1997;157:117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cross CA, Cespedes RD, McGuire EJ. Treatment results using pubovaginal slings in patients with large cystoceles and stress incontinence. J Urol. 1997;158:431.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zaragoza MR. Expanded indications for the pubovaginal sling: treatment of type 2 or 3 stress incontinence. J Urol. 1996;156:1620.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mason RC, Roach M. Modified pubovaginal sling for treatment of intrinsic sphincteric deficiency. J Urol. 1996;156:1991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blaivas JG, Olsson CA. Stress incontinence: classification and surgical approach. J Urol. 1988;139:727.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beck RP, McCormick S, Nordstrom L. The fascia lata sling procedure for treating recurrent genuine stress incontinence of urine. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72:699.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McGuire EJ, Bennett CJ, Konnak JA, et al. Experience with pubovaginal slings for urinary incontinence at the University of Michigan. J Urol. 1987;138:525.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Milose JC, Sharp KM, He C, et al. Success of autologous pubovaginal sling after failed synthetic mid urethral sling. J Urol. 2015;193:916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tennstedt S, Urinary Incontinence Treatment, N. Design of the Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy Trial (SISTEr). Urology. 2005;66:1213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brubaker L, Richter HE, Norton PA, et al. 5-year continence rates, satisfaction and adverse events of burch urethropexy and fascial sling surgery for urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2012;187:1324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tennstedt SL, Litman HJ, Zimmern P, et al. Quality of life after surgery for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:1631.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Richter HE, Diokno A, Kenton K, et al. Predictors of treatment failure 24 months after surgery for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2008;179:1024.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee D, Murray S, Bacsu CD, et al. Long-term outcomes of autologous pubovaginal fascia slings: is there a difference between primary and secondary slings? Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brubaker L, Chiang S, Zyczynski H, et al. The impact of stress incontinence surgery on female sexual function. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:562.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kraus SR, Lemack GE, Richter HE, et al. Changes in urodynamic measures two years after Burch colposuspension or autologous sling surgery. Urology. 2011;78:1263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kraus SR, Lemack GE, Sirls LT, et al. Urodynamic changes associated with successful stress urinary incontinence surgery: is a little tension a good thing? Urology. 2011;78:1257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Chai TC, Albo ME, Richter HE, et al. Complications in women undergoing Burch colposuspension versus autologous rectus fascial sling for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2009;181:2192.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kenton K, Richter H, Litman H, et al. Risk factors associated with urge incontinence after continence surgery. J Urol. 2009;182:2805.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Natale F, La Penna C, Saltari M, et al. Voiding dysfunction after anti-incontinence surgery. Minerva Ginecol. 2009;61:167.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Thiel DD, Pettit PD, McClellan WT, et al. Long-term urinary continence rates after simple sling incision for relief of urinary retention following fascia lata pubovaginal slings. J Urol. 2005;174:1878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kwon E, Schulz JA, Flood CG. Success of pubovaginal sling in patients with stress urinary incontinence and efficacy of vaginal sling release in patients with post-sling voiding dysfunction. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28:519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC. Pubovaginal fascial sling for the treatment of all types of stress urinary incontinence: surgical technique and long-term outcome. Urol Clin North Am. 2011;38:7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary E. Lemack MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(MPG 12000 kb)

(MP4 115000 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aggarwal, H., Harris, C., Lemack, G.E. (2017). Autologous Fascial Sling for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence. In: Zimmern, P., De, E. (eds) Native Tissue Repair for Incontinence and Prolapse. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45268-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45268-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45266-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45268-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics