Abstract
There exist two major modeling paradigms for business process modeling: The predominant activity centric one and the artifact centric paradigm. Both are suitable for modeling and for executing business processes. However, process models are typically designed from different perspectives. Current translation methods operate on the syntactic level, preserving the point of view of the source process. The results of such translations are not particularly useful, understandable and insightful for stakeholders. In this paper we motivate the need for ontology-guided translations by comparing the results of a purely syntactic translation with a manual translation. We discuss shortcomings of the generated solutions and propose an ontology-based framework and sketch corresponding translation method for the generation of semantic translations, which allow to incorporate the point of view of the target modeling paradigm.
Research conducted while visiting UC SB and supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) under grant J-3609.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Organizing Business Knowledge: The MIT Process Handbook, vol. 1. The MIT Press, 1st edn. (2003)
Boaz, D., Heath, T., Gupta, M., et al.: The ACSI hub: A data-centric environment for service interoperation. In: BPM 2014 Demos, p. 11, Septemper 2014
Born, M., Dörr, F., Weber, I.: User-friendly semantic annotation in business process modeling. In: Weske, M., Hacid, M.-S., Godart, C. (eds.) WISE Workshops 2007. LNCS, vol. 4832, pp. 260–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Damaggio, E., Hull, R., Vaculín, R.: On the equivalence of incremental and fixpoint semantics for business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles. Inf. Syst. 38(4), 561–584 (2013)
De Masellis, R., Lembo, D., Montali, M., Solomakhin, D.: Semantic enrichment of gsm-based artifact-centric models. J. Data Semant. 4(1), 3–27 (2015)
Eder, J., Kerschbaumer, N., Köpke, J., et al.: View-based interorganizational workflows. In: Proceedings of CompSysTech 2011, Vienna, pp. 1–10 (2011)
Eshuis, R., Norta, A., Kopp, O., Pitkanen, E.: Service outsourcing with process views. IEEE T. Serv. Comput. 8(1), 136–154 (2015)
Eshuis, R., Van Gorp, P.: Synthesizing data-centric models from business process models. Computing 98, 1–29 (2015)
Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques. Requirements Eng. 9(4), 248–260 (2004)
Günther, C.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Fuzzy mining – adaptive process simplification based on multi-perspective metrics. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 328–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Hinge, K., Ghose, A., Koliadis, G.: A tool for semantic effect annotation of business process models. In: IEEE EDOC CONF 2009, pp. 55–63 (2009)
Hull, R., Damaggio, E., De Masellis, R., et al.: Business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles: managing artifact interactions with conditions and events. In: Proceedings of DEBS 2011, pp. 51–62. ACM (2011)
Köpke, J., Eder, J.: Semantic annotation of XML-schema for document transformations. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6428, pp. 219–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Köpke, J., Eder, J., Künstner, M.: Top-down design of collaborating processes. In: Proceedings of IIWAS 2014, pp. 336–345 (2014)
Kumaran, S., Liu, R., Wu, F.Y.: On the duality of information-centric and activity-centric models of business processes. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 32–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Mafazi, S., Grossmann, G., Mayer, W., Schrefl, M., Stumptner, M.: Consistent abstraction of business processes based on constraints. JoDS 4(1), 59–78 (2015)
Meyer, A., Weske, M.: Activity-centric and artifact-centric process model roundtrip. BPM Workshops, LNBIP 171, 167–181 (2014)
Moody, D.L.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data Knowl. Eng. 55(3), 243–276 (2005)
W3C OWL Working Group. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Document Overview. W3C Recommendation, 27 October 2009
Popova, V., Dumas, M.: From petri nets to guard-stage-milestone models. BPM Workshops, LNBIP 132, 340–351 (2013)
Popova, V., Fahland, D., Dumas, M.: Artifact lifecycle discovery. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 24(01), 1550001 (2015)
Santiputri, M., Ghose, A.K., Dam, H.K., Wen, X.: Mining process task post-conditions. In: Johannesson, P., et al. (eds.) ER 2015. LNCS, vol. 9381, pp. 514–527. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_38
Smirnov, S., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Meronymy-based aggregation of activities in business process models. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Smirnov, S., Reijers, H.A., Weske, M., et al.: Business process model abstraction: a definition, catalog, and survey. Distrib. Parallel DAT 30(1), 63–99 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Köpke, J., Su, J. (2016). Towards Ontology Guided Translation of Activity-Centric Processes to GSM. In: Reichert, M., Reijers, H. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 256. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42887-1_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42887-1_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42886-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42887-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)