Skip to main content

Using CQA History to Improve Q&A Experience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications -- ICCSA 2016 (ICCSA 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9789))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Social query is the practice of sharing questions through collaborative environments. In order to receive help, askers usually broadcast their request to the entire community. However, the prerequisite to receive help is to have the problem noticed by someone able and available to answer. Some works found a correlation between the characteristics of the questions and the outcome of receiving or not an answer. These findings suggest that there are some characteristics that are more likely to attract the attention of helpers. Our proposal is to analyse CQA history to identify the similar characteristics of previously asked questions that were answered. We believe that adding these characteristics in new questions will impact the receiving of answers. We evaluate our proposal using real world data and a real world experiment. Our results indicate that including “good characteristics” in the question reduce time for first response and improve answer quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://answers.yahoo.com.

  2. 2.

    http://stackoverflow.com.

  3. 3.

    http://facebook.com.

  4. 4.

    http://twitter.com.

  5. 5.

    http://www.guj.com.br.

  6. 6.

    http://www.google.com.

References

  1. Mansilla, A., Esteva, J.: Survey of social search from the perspectives of the village paradigm and online social networks. J. Inform. Sci. 39(5), 688–707 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Raban, D., Harper, F.: Motivations for answering questions online. New Media and Innovative Technologies (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Souza, C.C., De Magalhães, J.J., De Costa, E.B., Fechine, J.M.: Predicting potential responders in twitter: a query routing algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, pp. 714–729 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Furlan, B., Nikolic, B., Milutinovic, V.A.: Survey of intelligent question routing systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference Intelligent Systems, pp. 014–020 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dror, G., Koren, Y., Maarek, Y., Szpektor, I.: I want to answer, who has a question? Yahoo! answers recommender system. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1109–1117 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nichols, J., Kang, J.: Asking questions of targeted strangers on social networks. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 999–1002 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dror, G., Maarek, Y., Szpektor, I.: Will my question be answered? predicting “question answerability” in community question-answering sites. In: Proceedings of the Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 499–514 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Comarela, G., Crovella, M., Almeida, V., Benevenuto, F.: Understanding factors that affect response rates in twitter. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGWEB Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 123–132 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Teevan, J., Morris, M., Panovich, K.: Factors affecting response quantity, quality, speed for questions asked via social network status messages. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Webblogs and Social Media, pp. 630–633 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burke, M., Joyce, E., Kim, T., Anand, V., Kraut, R.: Introductions requests: Rhetorical strategies that elicit response in online communities. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Communities and Technologies Conference, pp. 21–39 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, L., Bao, S., Lin, Q., Wu, X., Han, D., Su, Z., Yu, Y.: Analyzing predicting not-answered questions in community-dased question answering services. In: Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1273–1278 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Asaduzzaman, M., Mashiyat, A.S., Roy, C.K., Schneider, K.A.: Answering questions about unanswered questions of stack overflow. In: Proceedings of the 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp. 97–100 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Teevan, J., Morris, M.R., Panovich, K.: Does anyone know how to get good answers? how social network questions shape replies. Technical Report, No: MSR-TR-2013-62 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lampe, C., Gray, R., Fiore, A., Ellison, N.: Help is on the way: patterns of responses to resource requests on facebook. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 3–15 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Comarela, G., Crovella, M., Almeida, V., Benevenuto, F.: Understanding factors that affect response rates in twitter. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGWEB Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT 2012), pp. 123–132 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baltadzhieva, A., Chrupała, G.: Question quality in community question answering forums. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, pp. 8–13 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sullins, J., Mcnamara, D., Acuff, S., Neely, D., Hildebrand, E., Stewart, G., Hu, X.: Are you asking the right questions? The use of animated agents to teach learners to become better question askers. In: Proceedings of The 28th International Flairs Conference, pp. 479–481 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Furtado, A., Andrade, N., Oliveira, N., Brasileiro, F.: Contributor profiles, their dynamics, their importance in five qa sites. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1237–1252 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank the support of TIPS (http://www.grouptips.org) and IFPB–Campus Monteiro regarding the conduction of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cleyton Souza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Souza, C., Aragão, F., Remígio, J., Costa, E., Fechine, J. (2016). Using CQA History to Improve Q&A Experience. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications -- ICCSA 2016. ICCSA 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9789. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42089-9_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42089-9_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42088-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42089-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics