Skip to main content

Reintegration of First- and Second-Generation Children Returned to Burundi: A Multidimensional Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Children and Forced Migration

Abstract

This chapter describes a study about the reintegration of child returnees in Burundi, a small conflict-affected country that received more than 600,000 former refugees after the conflict ended in 2000. Using unique, nationally representative data collected in 2011, the authors compare the living conditions of both first- and second-generation child returnees to those of children who had not lived abroad; they used a multidimensional approach that encompasses six reintegration dimensions. The findings show a mixed picture regarding the reintegration into Burundi of child returnees, which supports the use of a multidimensional approach to disentangle the various areas of well-being for returning child refugees. The results highlight that more targeting of return households, and the children that reside within them, is needed in specific areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Reintegration is a process that should result in the disappearance of differences in legal rights and duties between returnees and their compatriots and the equal access of returnees to services, productive assets and opportunities” (UNHCR 2004, 7).

  2. 2.

    A notable exception is the work coming out of the Maastricht Graduate School of Governance. See: Gassmann et al. (2012, 2013); Siegel and Waidler (2012).

Works Cited

  • Alkire, S., and J. Foster. 2011. Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Journal of Public Economics 95: 476–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., and M. E. Santos. 2010. Acute Multidimensional Poverty: A New Index for Developing Countries. OPHI Working Paper 38, Oxford Department of International Development, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baulch, B., and E. Masset. 2003. Do Monetary and Nonmonetary Indicators Tell the Same Story About Chronic Poverty? A Study of Vietnam in the 1990s. World Development 31: 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, R., and S. Gent. 2006. Sustainable Return in Post-Conflict Contexts. International Migration 44: 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, R., K. Koser, K. Monk, G. Atfield, L. D’Onofrio, and R. Tiemoko. 2004. Understanding Voluntary Return. Home Office Report 50/04, London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F., and S. Chakravarty. 2003. The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality 1: 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., and N. Finch. 2003. Overlaps in Dimensions of Poverty. Journal of Social Policy 32: 513–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundervoet, T. 2009. Livestock, Land and Political Power: The 1993 Killings in Burundi. Journal of Peace Research 46: 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunte, T., and L. Monnier. 2011. Mediating Land Conflict in Burundi: A Documentation and Analysis Project. Bujumbura: ACCORD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassarino, J.-P. 2004. Theorising Return Migration: The Conceptual Approach to Return Migrants Revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies 6(2): 253–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassarino, J. P. (ed.). 2008. Return Migrants to the Maghreb, Reintegration and Development Challenges. San Domenico di Fiesolo: European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (ed.). 2014. Reintegration and Development. San Domenico di Fiesolo: European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chimni, B.S. 2002. Refugees, Return and Reconstruction of “Post-Conflict” Societies: A Critical Perspective. International Peacekeeping 9(2): 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, J. 2000. Africa’s Refugees: Patterns, Problems and Policy Challenges. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 18(2): 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransen, S. 2011. Migration and Development: A World in Motion. Fieldwork Report Burundi: Methodology and Sampling. Maastricht: Maastricht Graduate School of Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransen, S. 2015. The Socio-Economic Sustainability of Refugee Return: Insights from Burundi. Population, Space and Place. Early view available online. 10.1002/psp.1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransen, S., and K. Kuschminder. 2012. Reintegration After Repatriation: The Long-Term Challenges of Return Migration in Burundi. New Issues in Refugee Research, Research Paper No. 242. Geneva: UNHCR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransen, S., and K. Kuschminder. 2014. Lessons Learned from Refugee Return Settlement Policies in Africa: A Case Study on Burundi’s Rural Integrated Villages Approach. Refugee Survey Quarterly 33 (1): 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, F., M. Siegel, M. Vanore, and J. Waidler. 2012. The Impact of Migration on Elderly Left Behind in Moldova. UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2012-082.

  • ———. 2013. The Impact of Migration on Children Left Behind in Moldova. UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2013-043.

  • International Crisis Group (ICG). 1999. Burundian Refugees in Tanzania: The Key Factor to the Burundi Peace Process. Nairobi: International Crisis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE). 2013. EiE Crisis Spotlight: Burundi. New York: INEE. http://www.ineesite.org/en/crisis-spotlights/burundi.

  • International Organization for Migration (IOM). 2004. Glossary on Migration. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koser, K., and K. Kuschminder. 2015. Comparative Research on the Assisted Voluntary Return and Reintegration of Migrants. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laderchi, C.R., R. Saith, and F. Steward. 2003. Does It Matter that We Do Not Agree on the Definition of Poverty? A Comparison of Four Approaches. Oxford Development Studies 31: 243–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. 1992. Human Functioning and Social Justice. Political Theory 20: 202–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rema Ministries. 2012. “Umenga Ntituri Abarundi” Rethinking Reintegration in Burundi. Bujumbura: Rema Ministries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogge, J.R. 1994. Repatriation of Refugees: A Not So Simple ‘Optimum’ Solution. In When Refugees Go Home, ed. T. Allen, and H. Morsink. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1976. Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement. Econometrica 44: 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Capability and Well-Being. In The Quality of Life, ed. M. Nussbaum, and Amartya Sen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Melissa, and Jennifer Waidler. 2012. Migration and Multi-Dimensional Poverty in Moldovan Communities. Eastern Journal of European Studies 3: 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, M. 2013. Adolescents and Violence: Lessons from Burundi. Institute of Development Policy and Management. University of Antwerp. Discussion Paper #2013.02.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR. 1996. Handbook Voluntary Repatriation: International Protection. Geneva: UNHCR.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Statistiques Demographiques du Rapatriement. Bujumbura: UNHCR Burundi Data Unit/Protection.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities. Geneva: UNHCR.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Evaluation of the Protracted Refugee Situation (PRS) for Burundians in Tanzania. Geneva: UNHCR.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Statistiques Demographiques du Rapatriement. Bujumbura: UNHCR Burundi Data Unit/Protection.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. 2008. Language a Challenge for Children Returning to Burundi. New York: UNICEF. http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/burundi_45682.html. Accessed 1 Apr 2015.

  • ———. 2009. UNICEF Humanitarian Action Burundi in 2009. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fransen, S., Siegel, M. (2016). Reintegration of First- and Second-Generation Children Returned to Burundi: A Multidimensional Approach. In: Ensor, M., Goździak, E. (eds) Children and Forced Migration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40691-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40691-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40690-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40691-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics