Skip to main content

The Use of Different Multiple Devices for an Ecological Assessment in Psychological Research: An Experience with a Daily Affect Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 478))

Abstract

Data gathering in psychological research is changing given the technological evolution and the availability of many different devices. However, very little research has been done to verify the validity of this kind of psychological measurements, even if a valid measure is the starting point for a valid research. Our study presents the results of a daily measurement of affect connected with the amount of time a person spends in a natural setting, considering the paradigm of restorative environments. High level of compliance was found from respondents, and also a good quality of the used measurements, in term of construct validity (using a Confirmatory Factor Analysis), invariance of the measure across days, and criterion related validity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axinn, W., Gatny, H., Wagner, J.: Maximizing data quality using mode switching in mixed-device survey design: Nonresponse bias and models of demographic behaviour. Methods, Data, Analyses 9(2), 163–184 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beauducel, A., Wittmann, W.W.: Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling 12, 41–75 (2005). doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1201_3

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Berto, R.: The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioural Sciences 4(4), 394–409 (2014). doi:10.3390/bs4040394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bowling, A.: Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. Journal of Public Health 27(3), 281–291 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Courvoisier, D.S., Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., Schreiber, W.H.: Psychometric properties of a computerized mobile phone method for assessing mood in daily life. Emotion 10(1), 115–124 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., Griffin, S.: The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 49, 71–75 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., Frumkin, H.: Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health 35, 207–228 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kahneman, D.: Objective happiness. In: Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwarz, N. (eds.) Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, pp. 3–25. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan, S.: The restorative benefits of nature: Toward and integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15, 169–182 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, Y., Briley, D.A., Ocepek, M.G.: Differential innovation of smartphone and application use by sociodemographics and personality. Computers in Human Behavior 44, 141–147 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kreuter, F., Presser, S., Tourangeau, R.: Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveys: The effects of mode and question sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly 72, 847–865 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Muthén, L.K., Muthén, B.O.: Mplus user’s guide, 5th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles (1998–2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pasini, M., Berto, R., Brondino, M., Hall, R., Ortner, C.: How to measure the restorative quality of environments: The PRS-11. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 159, 293–297 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shiffman, S., Stone, A.A., Hufford, M.R.: Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review in Clinical Psychology 4, 1–32 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Terracciano, A., McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T.: Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment 19(2), 131–141 (2003). doi:10.1027//1015-5759.19.2.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Toepoel, V., Lugtig, P.: Online surveys are mixed-device surveys. Issues associated with the use of different (mobile) devices in web surveys. Methods, Data, Analyses 9(2), 155–162 (2015). doi:10.12758/mda.2015.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tyrväinen, L., Ojala, A., Korpela, K., Lanki, T., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kagawa, T.: The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 38, 1–9 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ulrich, R.S.: Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: Altman, I., Wohlwill, J.F. (eds.) Behavior and the Natural Environment, pp. 85–125. Plenum, New York (1983)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Watson, D., Clark, L.A.: On traits and temperament - General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the 5-factor model. Journal of Personality 60, 441–476 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 1063–1070 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., Tellegen, A.: The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76, 820–838 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wong, C.K.H., Lam, C.L.K., Mulhern, B., Law, W.-L., Poon, J.T.C., Kwong, D.L.W., Tsang, J.: Measurement invariance of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Colorectal quality-of-life instrument among modes of administration. Quality of Life Research 22, 1415–1426 (2013). doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0272-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margherita Pasini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pasini, M., Brondino, M., Burro, R., Raccanello, D., Gallo, S. (2016). The Use of Different Multiple Devices for an Ecological Assessment in Psychological Research: An Experience with a Daily Affect Assessment. In: Caporuscio, M., De la Prieta, F., Di Mascio, T., Gennari, R., Gutiérrez Rodríguez, J., Vittorini, P. (eds) Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning . Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 478. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40165-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40165-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40164-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40165-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics