Abstract
Feminist theory has informed how psychologists and other social scientists think about doing science, in terms of epistemology and methodology. While there are many sources for understanding how feminist theory can inform theory and methods in psychological science, there are few reflections on what it looks like “on the ground” to try to incorporate feminist approaches into one’s professional academic life. This chapter examines the real world implications of feminist practices in the context of conducting research, mentoring, and working on institutional change. Drawing on examples from our own experiences, we discuss practical decisions informed by feminist commitments as well as some of their consequences. We also argue that feminist practices are sometimes (though not always) at odds with professional norms and expectations, particularly for early career scholars, who face enormous pressures to publish quickly and prolifically. Throughout, we offer specific suggestions for individual scholars, as well as the field, in order to make our science both more rigorous and inclusive, and our careers as feminist scholars more successful.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
We use the term “feminism” here, in the singular, but note that even among the three of us, the ways in which we understand and use the term feminist may differ, reflecting our different social locations, educational backgrounds, and research areas. However, as we note in our definition of feminist practices, what we share is an understanding that feminism is rooted in connecting everyday lived experiences with the socio-political structures that shape them.
- 2.
Generally, one may not want to use fill-in-the blank options with class, since most Americans tend to identify as “middle-class,” though this is changing somewhat (Pew, 2012).
References
Abrams, D. (2014). Reality check: Rigor, relevance, and the value of social psychological research. Forward, 1-6.
Adams, J. (2008). Conference report: International lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender psychology Summer Institute. Gay & Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 4(3), 201–204.
American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ansara, Y. G., & Hegarty, P. (2011). Cisgenderism in psychology: Pathologizing and misgendering children from 1999 to 2008. Psychology and Sexuality, 3, 137–160.
Betz, D. E., Ramsey, L. R., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013). Perceiving race relevance in everyday events: Target race matters, perceiver race does not. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 16, 699–716.
Bird, S., Litt, J. S., & Wang, Y. (2004). Creating status of women reports: Institutional housekeeping as “women’s work”. NWSA Journal, 16(1), 194–206.
Brescoll, V. L., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychological Science, 19(3), 268–275.
Brown, L. (1989). New voices/new visions: Toward a lesbian/gay paradigm for psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 445–458.
Case, K. (2009). A workshop just for you: Early career journeys with social policy. Forward, 239, 19–20.
Chhuon, V., & Hudley, C. (2010). Asian American ethnic options: How Cambodian students negotiate ethnic identities in a U.S. Urban School. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 41(4), 341–359.
Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180.
Cole, E. R., & Zucker, A. N. (2007). Black and white women’s perspectives on femininity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(1), 1.
Cortina, L. M., Curtin, N., & Stewart, A. J. (2012). Where is social structure in personality research? A feminist analysis of publication trends. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(3), 259–273.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 1241–1299.
Curtin, N., & Eaton, A. A. (2015, May), Gender beyond difference: An interactive discussion on the state of gender research in the psychological sciences. Chairs in an invited symposium conducted at the national conference for the American Psychological Association (APA) in New York, NY
Curtin, N., Hegarty, P., & Stewart, A. J. (2012). Fostering research collaborations in LGBT psychology: An introduction to the special issue. Psychology & Sexuality, 3, 187–194.
Curtin, N., Stewart, A. J., & Ostrove, J. M. (2013). Fostering academic self-concept advisor support and sense of belonging among international and domestic graduate students. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 108–137.
Diamond, L. M., Pardo, S. T., & Butterworth, M. R. (2011). Transgender experience and identity. In Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 629–647). New York: Springer.
Espinoza, O. (2007). Solving the equity-equality conceptual dilemma: A new model for analysis of the educational process. Educational Research, 49, 343–363.
Fine, M. (1999). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Freedman, J. (2014). Reclaiming the feminist vision: Consciousness-raising and small group practice. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Gonzales, R. G., & Chavez, L. R. (2012). “Awakening to a nightmare”: Abjectivity and illegality in the lives of undocumented 1.5-generation Latino Immigrants in the United States. Current Anthropology, 53(3), 255–281.
Grant, A. & Sandberg, S. (2015, February 6). Madam C.E.O., get me a coffee. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan, (Eds.) Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Grice, H.P. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan, (Eds.) Syntax and semantics (Vol. 9, pp. 113-127). New York: Academic Press.
Griffin, K. A., Bennett, J. C., & Harris, J. (2013). Marginalizing merit? Gender differences in Black faculty D/discourses on tenure, advancement, and professional success. Review of Higher Education, 36, 489–512.
Guthrie, R. V. (2002). Even the rat was white: A historical view of psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
Haupert, M., Murphy, M. C., & Smith, E. R. (2015). A question of trust: how context and wording of gender questions affects perceptions of researcher. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Long Beach, CA.
Hegarty, P., & Buechel, C. (2006). Androcentric reporting of gender differences in APA Journals: 1965-2004. Review of General Psychology, 10, 377–389.
hooks, B. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston, MA: South End Press.
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592.
King, K. R. (2003). Do you see what I see? Effects of group consciousness on African American women’s attributions to prejudice. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27(1), 17–30.
Lee, S. J. (1994). Behind the model-minority stereotype: Voices of high- and low-achieving Asian American students. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 25(4), 413–429.
Lott, B., & Bullock, H. E. (2007). Psychology and economic injustice: Personal, professional, and political intersections. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Maguire, P. (2001). Uneven ground: Feminisms and action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 60–70). London, UK: Sage.
Meier, S. C., & Labuski, C. M. (2013). The demographics of the transgender population. In A. K. Baumle (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality (pp. 289–331). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5512-3.
Metha, J. (2015). I racist. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-metta/i-racist_b_7770652.html.
Nelson, G. (2013). Community psychology and transformative policy change in the neo-liberal era. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52(3-4), 211–223.
Newton, N. (2015). The second Institute for Academic Feminist Psychologists. The Feminist Psychologist, 42, 29–30.
Olkin, R., & Pledger, C. (2003). Can disability studies and psychology join hands? American Psychologist, 58(4), 296.
Ostrove, J. M., Stewart, A. J., & Curtin, N. L. (2011). Social class and belonging: Implications for graduate students’ career aspirations. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(6), 748–774.
Parlee, M. B. (1975). Psychology. Signs, 1(1), 119–138.
Pew Research Center. (August 22, 2012). The lost decade of the middle class. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/08/22/the-lost-decade-of-the-middle-class/
Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5-6), 377–391.
Quinlan, K. M. (1999). Enhancing mentoring and networking of junior academic women: What, why, and how? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 21(1), 31–42.
Ramsey, L. R., & Hoyt, T. (2015). The object of desire: How being objectified creates sexual pressure for women in heterosexual relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 151–170.
Ritchie, A., & Barker, M. (2006). ‘There aren’t words for what we do or how we feel so we have to make them up’: Constructing polyamorous languages in a culture of compulsory monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 584–601.
Roberts, A., Cash, T. F., Feingold, A., & Johnson, B. T. (2006). Are black-white differences in females' body dissatisfaction decreasing? A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(6), 1121–1131.
Rushing, S., Levine, M., & Winterrowd, E. (2015, June). Successful interventions with demonstrated impacts. Symposium conducted at the ADVANCE/GSE Program Workshop, Baltimore, MD.
Sabik, N. J., Cole, E. R., & Ward, L. M. (2010). Are all minority women equally buffered from negative body image? Intra‐ethnic moderators of the buffering hypothesis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 139–151.
Scherrer, K. S. (2008). Coming to an asexual identity: Negotiating identity, negotiating desire. Sexualities, 11(5), 621–641.
Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods and the logic of communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93–105.
Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59(5-6), 301–311.
Stern, P. C. (2011). Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 303–314. doi:10.1037/a0023235.
Suyemoto, K. L. (2002). Redefining “Asian American” identity: Reflections on differentiating ethnic and racial identities for Asian American individuals and communities. In L. Zhan (Ed.), Asian Americans: Vulnerable populations, model interventions, and clarifying agendas (pp. 195–231). Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
Syed, M. (2010). Disciplinarity and methodology in intersectionality theory and research. American Psychologist, 65(1), 61–62. doi:10.1037/a0017495.
Tate, C. C., Ledbetter, J. N., & Youssef, C. P. (2013). A two-question method for assessing gender categories in the social and medical sciences. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 767–776.
Tran, L. T., & Walter, P. G. (2010). National unity and ethnic identity in a Vietnamese university. Comparative Education Review, 54(4), 483–511.
Turner, C. S. V. (2002). Women of color in academe: Living with multiple marginality. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 74–93.
van Anders, S. M. (2012). The first feminist sex research reception at the International Academy of Sex Research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(2), 323–324.
van Anders, S. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1–37.
Wingfield, A. H. (2010). Are some emotions marked ‘whites only’? Racialized feeling rules in professional workplaces. Social Problems, 57(2), 251–268.
Wong, F., & Halgin, R. (2006). The model minority: Bane or blessing for Asian Americans? Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 34(1), 38–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Curtin, N., Ramsey, L.R., Tran, J. (2016). The Benefits and Risks of Feminist Practice as Early Career Scholars in Social Psychology. In: Roberts, TA., Curtin, N., Duncan, L., Cortina, L. (eds) Feminist Perspectives on Building a Better Psychological Science of Gender. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32141-7_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32141-7_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32139-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32141-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)