Abstract
This paper describes a pilot study to evaluate its use for teacher Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in Computer Science (CS) using the Bridge21 model, a particular model of 21st century teaching and learning. A range of introductory Computer Science workshops are evaluated that include topics such as; Computational Thinking, Scratch, Raspberry Pi and Python. This paper includes a detailed look at the generalized activity model used in all Bridge21 activities. Combining the Kirkpatrick training evaluation theory with ethnographic methods the researchers analyzed qualitative and quantitative data gathered from 110 in-service teachers whom attended 9 CS CPD workshops. Using the Kirkpatrick framework as a taxonomy with which to code data relating to (a) teachers initial reactions towards the workshops and (b) intentions towards use of the Bridge21 model for supporting CS classroom delivery. Findings indicate that teachers’ initial reactions towards the programme were positive and that teachers intend to use the model in their classroom.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beetham, H., Sharpe, R.: Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st Century Learning. Taylor and Francis, Oxon (2013)
Bell, T., Alexander, J., Freeman, I., Grimley, M.: Computer science unplugged: school students doing real computing without computers. New Zealand J. Appl. Comput. Inf. Technol. 13(1), 20–29 (2009)
Bray, A., Tangney, B.: Mathematics, technology interventions and pedagogy-seeing the wood from the trees. In: The CSEDU (2013)
Brown, N.C.C., Sentance, S., Crick, T., Humphreys, S.: Restart: the resurgence of computer science in UK schools. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. (TOCE) 14(2), 1–22 (2014)
Brown, T., Wyatt, J.: Design thinking for social innovation. Dev. Outreach 12(1), 29–43 (2010)
Bybee, R.W., Fuchs, B.: Preparing the 21st century workforce: a new reform in science and technology education. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 43(4), 349–352 (2006)
Byrne, J.R., Fisher, L., Tangney, B.: Computer science teacher reactions towards raspberry Pi continuing professional development (CPD) workshops using the Bridge21 model. In: The IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Education, Cambridge, UK (2015)
Conneely, C., Murchan, D., Tangney, B., and Johnston, K.: 21st century learning–teachers’ and students’ experiences and views of the Bridge21 approach within mainstream education. In: The Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (2013)
Cunny, J.: Transforming computer science education in high schools. Computer 44(6), 107–109 (2011)
Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S.: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) The Landscape of Qualitative Research, pp. 1–42. Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks (2013)
Fee, S.B., Holland-Minkley, A.M.: Teaching computer science through problems, not solutions. Comput. Sci. Educ. 20(2), 129–144 (2010)
Fisher, L.: Evaluating use of the Bridge21 model for teacher continuous professional development (CPD) in computer science (CS). In: 11th European Evaluation Society Biennial Conference (EES), Dublin, IE (2014)
Hazzan, O., Lapidot, T., Ragonis, N.: Teaching Methods in Computer Science Education Guide to Teaching Computer Science: An Activity-Based Approach, pp. 91–118. Springer, London (2010)
Hein, G.E.: The constructivist museum. J. Educ. Mus. 16, 21–23 (1995)
Kirkpatrick, D.L.: Evaluating: Part of a Ten-Step Process Evaluating Training Programs- The Four Levels, pp. 3–16. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Fransisco (1994)
Kirkwood, M.: Infusing higher-order thinking and learning to learn into content instruction: a case study of secondary computing studies in Scotland. J. Curriculum Stud. 32(4), 509–535 (2000)
Kristiansen, N.: Making smile sheets count Infoline No. 250402. In: Kirkpatrick D.L. (ed.) The Four Levels of Evaluation Measurement and Evaluation Tips, Tools, and Intelligence for Trainers, 7(1), p. 3. American Society for Training and Development (ASTD), USA (2007)
Conneely, C., Lawlor, J., Tangney, B.: Towards a pragmatic model for group-based, technology-mediated, project-oriented learning–an overview of the B2C model. In: Lytras, M.D., et al. (eds.) TECH-EDUCATION 2010. CCIS, vol. 73, pp. 602–609. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
LeCompte, M.D., Schensul, J.J.: Using Constant Comparison and Analytical Induction to Identiy Items Analyzing and Interpreting Ethnographic Data, pp. 75–78. Altamira Press, London (1999)
Lier, L.V.: Action-based teaching, autonomy and identify. Int. J. Innov. Lang. Learn. Teach. 1(1), 46–65 (2007)
Medina, J.A., Sanchez, J.J., Garcia-Lopez, E., Garcia-Cabot, A.: Learning outcomes using objectives with computer science students. In: The Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (2014)
NCCA: Short Course - Coding (2014a). http://www.curriculumonline.ie/Junior-cycle/Short-Courses/Coding
NCCA: Short Course - Digital Media Literacy (2014b). http://www.curriculumonline.ie/Junior-cycle/Short-Courses/Digital-Media-Literacy
Noonan, S.J.: 21st Century Learners and Pedagogy in Teacher Effectiveness and Learner-Centred Practice How Real Teachers Learn to Engage All Learners, pp. 71–72. Rowman and Littlefield Education, Plymouth (2013)
O’Donovan, D.: Enquiry based Learning at Bridge21 (2015). https://sites.google.com/site/enquirybasedlearningatbridge21/home
O’Grady, M.J.: Practical problem based learning in computing education. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 12(3), 10 (2012)
Petersen, C.I., Gorman, K.S.: Strategies to address common challenges when teaching in an active learning classroom. In: Baepler, P., Brooks, D.C., Walker, J.D. (eds.) Active Learning Spaces, vol. 137, pp. 63–71. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)
Rosen, M.: Coming to terms with the field: understanding and doing organizational ethnography. J. Manag. Stud. 28(1), 1–24 (1991)
Sentance, S., Dorling, M., McNicol, A.: Computer science in secondary schools in the UK: ways to empower teachers informatics in schools. In: Diethelm, I., Mittermeir, R.T. (eds.) ISSEP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7780, pp. 15–30. Springer, Berlin (2013)
Silva, E.: Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappan 90(9), 630–634 (2009)
Tedlock, B.: Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 455–486. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1994)
Vygotsky, L.S.: Interaction between learning and development. In: Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., Souberman, E. (eds.) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, pp. 79–91. Harvard University Press, London (1978)
Wells, G.: Towards a social constructivist model of learning and teaching dialogic inquiry. In: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education, vol. 1, pp. 335–337. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)
Yadav, A., Korb, J.T.: Learning to teach computer science: the need for a methods course. Commun. ACM 55(11), 31–33 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Byrne, J.R., Fisher, L., Tangney, B. (2016). A 21st Century Teaching and Learning Approach to Computer Science Education: Teacher Reactions. In: Zvacek, S., Restivo, M., Uhomoibhi, J., Helfert, M. (eds) Computer Supported Education. CSEDU 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 583. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29584-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29585-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)