Skip to main content

Learning Parliamentary Profiles for Recommendation Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Artificial Intelligence (CAEPIA 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9422))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 952 Accesses

Abstract

We consider the problem of building a content-based recommender system in a parliamentary context, which may be used for two different but related tasks. First, we consider a filtering task where, given a new document to be recommended, the system can decide those Members of the Parliament who should receive it. Second, we also consider a recommendation task where, given a request from a citizen, the system should present information on those deputies that are more involved in the topics of the request. To build the system we collected, for each Member of the Parliament, the text of corresponding speeches within the parliament debates and generated, with different techniques, a profile that was used to match against the input (document or request). We tested our methods using the documents of the regional Andalusian Parliament at Spain, obtaining promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An initiative is the literal transcription of the discussion in the parliament of a petition presented by specific MPs or groups.

  2. 2.

    http://www.parlamentodeandalucia.es.

  3. 3.

    In parentheses we present the short acronym used in the figures and tables in this section.

  4. 4.

    https://lucene.apache.org.

  5. 5.

    We consider that this is a rather conservative assumption, because it is quite reasonable to think that an initiative can also be relevant to other MPs.

  6. 6.

    The change in the underlying intent between the original query and its expanded form.

  7. 7.

    We are not going to discuss their impact in this work, since the accuracy values obtained are worse in all the cases.

References

  1. Belkin, N.J., Croft, W.B.: Information filtering and information retrieval: two sides of the same coin? Commun. ACM 35, 29–38 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Busby, A., Belkacem, K.: ‘Coping with the Information Overload’: An Exploration of Assistants’ Backstage Role in the Everyday Practice of European Parliament Politics. European Integration online Papers, vol. 17 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Campos, L.M., Fernández-Luna, J.M., Huete, J.F., Martin-Dancausa, C.J., Tur-Vigil, C., Tagua, A.: An integrated system for managing the andalusian parliament’s digital library. Program Electron. Libr. Inf. Syst. 43, 121–139 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gauch, S., Speretta, M., Chandramouli, A., Micarelli, A.: User profiles for personalized information access. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) Adaptive Web 2007. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 54–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Pasi, G.: Issues in personalizing information retrieval. IEEE Intell. Inf. Bull. 10, 3–7 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jarvelin, K., Kekalainen, J.: Cumulative gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 20, 422–446 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lantz, B.: Machine Learning with R. Packt Publishing Ltd., UK (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Palvia, S.C.J., Sharma, S.S.: E-government and e-governance: definitions/domain framework and status around the world wide web. Foundations of e-government. In: 5th International Conference on E-Governance, pp. 1–12 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pazzani, M.J., Billsus, D.: Content-based recommendation systems. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) Adaptive Web 2007. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 325–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Shamin, J., Neuhold, C.: ‘Connecting Europe’: the use of ‘new’ information and communication technologies within european parliament standing committees. J. Legislative Stud. 13, 388–402 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vicente-López, E., de Campos, L.M., Fernández-Luna, J.M., Huete, J.F.: Personalization of parliamentary document retrieval using different user profiles. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Personalization in eGovernment Services and Applications (PEGOV2014), pp. 28–37 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Paper supported by the Spanish “Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad” under the project TIN2013-42741-P.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis M. de Campos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Campos, L.M., Fernández-Luna, J.M., Huete, J.F., Calado, P., Martins, B. (2015). Learning Parliamentary Profiles for Recommendation Tasks. In: Puerta, J., et al. Advances in Artificial Intelligence. CAEPIA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9422. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24598-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24598-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24597-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24598-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics