Skip to main content

Outcome Prediction for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury with Dynamic Features from Intracranial Pressure and Arterial Blood Pressure Signals: A Gaussian Process Approach

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 122))

Abstract

Previous work has been demonstrated that tracking features describing the dynamic and time-varying patterns in brain monitoring signals provide additional predictive information beyond that derived from static features based on snapshot measurements. To achieve more accurate predictions of outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), we proposed a statistical framework to extract dynamic features from brain monitoring signals based on the framework of Gaussian processes (GPs). GPs provide an explicit probabilistic, nonparametric Bayesian approach to metric regression problems. This not only provides probabilistic predictions, but also gives the ability to cope with missing data and infer model parameters such as those that control the function’s shape, noise level and dynamics of the signal. Through experimental evaluation, we have demonstrated that dynamic features extracted from GPs provide additional predictive information in addition to the features based on the pressure reactivity index (PRx). Significant improvements in patient outcome prediction were achieved by combining GP-based and PRx-based dynamic features. In particular, compared with the a baseline PRx-based model, the combined model achieved over 30 % improvement in prediction accuracy and sensitivity and over 20 % improvement in specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abad N, Druzgalski C (2009) Medical and engineering support and needs in neurological intensive care units. In: Proceedings of the PAHCE'09, Mexico City, Mexico, pp 157–159

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arindam C, Prasanth BN, Andy JK (2002) A data parallel approach for large-scale Gaussian process modeling. Proceeding of SDM

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balestreri M, Czosnyka M, Steiner LA, Hiler M, Schmidt EA, Matta B, Menon D, Hutchinson P, Pickard JD (2005) Association between outcome, cerebral pressure reactivity and slow ICP waves following head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 95:25–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Catherine JK, Robert LB, Pamela HM (2008) Intracranial pressure variability and long-term outcome following traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 102:105–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clifton L, Clifton DA, Pimentel MA, Watkinson PJ, Tarassenko L (2013) Gaussian processes for personalized e-health monitoring with wearable sensors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60(1):193–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Costa M, Goldberger AL, Peng CK (2002) Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. Phys Rev Lett 89:68–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Czosnyka M, Pickard JD (2004) Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:813–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Czosnyka M, Hutchinson PJ, Balestreri M, Hiler M, Smielewski P, Pickard JD (2006) Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure after head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 96(4):121–125

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dutton R, McCunn M (2003) Traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Crit Care 9(6):503–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Edward S, Zoubin G (2005) Sparse Gaussian processes using pseudo-inputs. NIPS

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feng M, Loy LY, Zhang F, Guan CT et al.(2011) Artifact removal for intracranial pressure monitoring Signals. In: A Robust Solution with Signal Decomposition. Proceedings of 33rd international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guendling K, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Lewis P, Nortje J, Timofeev I, Hutchinson PJ, Pickard JD (2006) Use of ICM+ software for on-line analysis of intracranial and arterial pressures in head-injured patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl 96(4):108–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hlatky R, Valadka AB, Robertson CS (2005) Intracranial pressure response to induced hypertension: role of dynamic pressure autoregulation. Neurosurgery 57:9117–9123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. http://www.slavicabiochem.com/traumaticBrainInjury.html

  15. Hu X, Xu P, Scalzo F, Vespa P, Bergsneider M (2009) Morphological clustering and analysis of continuous intracranial pressure. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 56(3):696–705

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu X, Asgari XP, Vespa P, Bergsneider M (2010) Forecasting ICP elevation based on prescient changes of intracranial pressure waveform morphology. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 57(5):1070–1078

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ivanov PC, Amaral LA, Goldberger AL, Havlin S, Rosenblum MG, Struzik ZR, Stanley HE (1999) Multifractality in human heartbeat dynamics. Nature 399:461–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones P, Andrews P, Midgley S, Anderson S, Piper I, Tocher J, Housley A, Corrie J, Slattery J, Dearden N (1994) Measuring the burden of secondary insults in head-injured patients during intensive care. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 6(1):4–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee KK, Seow WT, Ng I (2006) Demographical profiles of adult severe traumatic brain injury patients: implications for healthcare planning. Singapore Med J 47(1):31–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marmarou A, Anderson JRL, Ward JD, Choi SC, Young HF, Eisenberg HM, Foulkes MA, Marshall LF, Jane JA (1991) Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe heal trauma. J Neurosurg 75:59–66

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marmarou A (2000) Increased intracranial pressure in head injury and influence of blood volume. J Neurotrauma 9:327–333

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rasmussen E, Williams CKI (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT Press, ISBN 0-262-18253, us

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roberts S, Osborne M, Ebden M, Reece S, Gibson N, Aigrain S (2012) Gaussian processes for time-series modelling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (Part A), 371(1984): online

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robertson C, Valadka A, Hannay H, Contant C, Gopinath S, Cormio M, Uzura M, Grossman R (1999) Prevention of secondary ischemic insults after severe head injury. Crit Care Med 27(10):2086–2095

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ross N, Eynon CA (2005) Intracranial pressure monitoring. Curr Anaesth Crit Care 16(4):255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Signorini D, Andrews P, Jones P, Wardlaw J, Miller J (1999) Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66(1):20–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Swiercz M, Mariak Z, Krejza J, Lewko J, Szydlik P (2000) Intracranial pressure processing with artificial neural networks: prediction of ICP trends. Acta Neurochir 142(4):531–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wald S, Shackford S (1993) The effect of secondary insults on mortality and long-term disability after severe head injury in a rural region without a trauma system. J Trauma 34(3):377–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wright W (2007) Multimodal monitoring in the ICU: when could it be useful? J Neurol Sci 261(1–2):10–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr Mengling Feng’s fellowship is funded by A*STAR Graduate Scholarship (AGS). Marco A F Pimentel is supported by the RCUK Digital Economy Program grant number EP/G036861/1 (Oxford Centre for Doctoral Training in Healthcare Innovation) and FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia – under grant SFRH/DB/79799/2011.

Conflict of Interest Statement

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengling Feng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pimentel, M.A.F., Brennan, T., Lehman, Lw., King, N.K.K., Ang, BT., Feng, M. (2016). Outcome Prediction for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury with Dynamic Features from Intracranial Pressure and Arterial Blood Pressure Signals: A Gaussian Process Approach. In: Ang, BT. (eds) Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring XV. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 122. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22532-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22533-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics