Skip to main content

Highlighting Value and Effort Drivers Early in Business and System Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques (SoMeT 2014)

Abstract

In complex business modelling and software development projects, we often observe that teams focus on those aspects of a system that are well understood or easy to resolve, while a blind eye is turned (consciously or subconsciously) to the actual value and effort drivers – i.e. those components that require higher effort due to their intrinsic value, risk, complexity or uncertainty. In this paper, we introduce a pragmatic approach for highlighting elements of high-level business and system models with visual annotations that mark particular issues, requirements or complexities that would otherwise not immediately meet the eye, and would thus present risks to a project’s successful completion if uncovered too late.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is an extended version of work presented at the 13th International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques (SoMeT 2014) [1].

References

  1. Book, M., Grapenthin, S., Gruhn, V.: Highlighting value and effort drivers early in business and system models. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. New Trends in Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, vol. 265, pp. 530–544, IOS Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Book, M., Grapenthin, S., Gruhn, V.: Seeing the forest and the trees: focusing team interaction on value and effort drivers. In: Proceedings of 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, (ACM SIGSOFT 2012/FSE-20), pp. 11–16. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boehm, B.W., Sullivan, K.J.: Software economics: a roadmap. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Future of Software Engineering (FOSE 2000), pp. 319–343. ACM (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grapenthin, S., Book, M., Gruhn, V., Schneider C., Völker, K.: Reducing complexity using an interaction room – an experience report. In: Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on the Design of Communication Conference (SIGDOC 2013), pp. 71–76. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davidson, E.J.: Joint application design (JAD) in practice. J. Syst. Softw. 45(3), 215–223 (1999). Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burge, J.E., Carroll, J.M., McCall, R., Mistrík, I.: Rationale-Based Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwaber, K., Beedle, M.: Agile Software Development with Scrum. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Petre, M., Sharp, H., Freudenberg, S.: The mystery of the writing that isn’t on the wall: differences in public representations in traditional and agile software development. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE 2012), pp. 120–122. IEEE Computer Society (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldschmidt, G.: The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Res. J. 4, 123–143 (1991). Taylor & Francis

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodriguez, A., Fernandez-Medina, E., Piattini, M.: Security requirement with a UML 2.0 profile. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES 2006), pp. 670–677. IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rodriguez, A., Fernandez-Medina, E., Piattini, M.: A BPMN extension for the modeling of security requirements in business processes. Trans. Inf. Syst. E90-D(4), 745–752 (2007). Oxford University Press

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saeedi, K., Zhao, L., Falcone Sampaio, P.R.: Extending BPMN for supporting customer-facing service quality requirements. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2010), pp. 616–623. IEEE Computer Society (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zou, J., Pavlovski, C.: Control case approach to record and model non-functional requirements. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manage. 6(1), 49–67 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Book, M., Grapenthin, S., Gruhn, V.: Value-based migration of legacy data structures. In: Winkler, D., Biffl, S., Bergsmann, J. (eds.) SWQD 2014. LNBIP, vol. 166, pp. 115–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Book .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Book, M., Grapenthin, S., Gruhn, V. (2015). Highlighting Value and Effort Drivers Early in Business and System Models. In: Fujita, H., Selamat, A. (eds) Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques. SoMeT 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 513. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17530-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17530-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17529-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17530-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics