Abstract
The end-to-end proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis has become the digital arthrodesis technique of choice. When performed properly, it produces a stable construct and affords for good long-term correction, high success rates, and satisfied patients. Traditionally, the preferred form of fixation of lesser digital arthrodesis was with a percutaneous Kirschner wire (k-wire). In recent years however, the number of fixation options for the correction of digital deformities has greatly expanded, mainly with internal implants. Advocates of these internal fixation devices claim that k-wire fixation has poor patient acceptance and has an increased risk for infection because of exposed wires. Although these internal fixation devices may have a higher patient acceptance rate, they have not been shown to have a higher fusion rate nor a higher patient satisfaction rate, and they are quite costly when compared to k-wires. The cost-effective solution is the buried k-wire. The k-wire can easily be transformed into an internal implant, so that there are increased patient acceptance and decreased risk of infection, and it still produces high fusion and success rates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Good J, Fiala K. Digital surgery: current trends and techniques. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010;27(4):625–8.
Coughlin MJ, Dorris J, Polk E. Operative repair of the fixed hammertoe deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(2):94–104.
Hofbauer MH, Shane AM. Lesser digital surgery: arthroplasty, arthrodesis, and flexor tendon transfer. In: Chang TJ, editor. Master techniques in podiatric surgery: the foot and ankle. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005. p. 35–47.
Lamm BM, Ribeiro CE, et al. Peg-in-hole, end-to-end, and V arthrodesis a comparison of digital stabilization in fresh cadaveric specimens. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001;91(2):63–7.
Baig AU, Geary NPJ. Fusion rate and patient satisfaction in proximal interphalangeal joint fusion of the minor toes using Kirschner wire fixation. Foot. 1996;6(3):120–1.
Angirasa AK, Augoyard M, Coughlin MJ, Fridman R, Ruch J, Weil L Jr, Section Editor. Hammer toe, mallet toe, and claw toe (roundtable discussion). Foot Ankle Spec. 2011;4(3):182–7.
Scholl A, McCarty J, Scholl D, Mar A. Smart toe implant versus buried Kirschner wire for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis: a comparative study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(5):580–3.
Ellington K, Anderson RB, Davis WH, Cohen BE, Jones CP. Radiographic analysis of proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis with an intramedullary fusion device for lesser toe deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(5):372–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Butterworth, M. (2019). Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis via Kirschner Wire Fixation. In: Cook, E., Cook, J. (eds) Hammertoes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16552-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16552-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16551-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16552-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)