Abstract
Engineering is an inherently normative practice dependent on how engineers understand history. Social vision, however, when mentioned in an engineering context typically brings to mind extremist regimes such as Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia. But all engineers practice with assumptions about how their interventions in the material world will change society. The historian of American engineering Edwin Layton called this set of socio-political beliefs the ideology of engineering. Engineers’ beliefs, however, have not been uniform across time and geography. Engineers have worked in specific national, international, corporate, and government contexts that have influenced how they see society’s past, present, and future. This essay surveys the historical literature on engineers’ social thought and presents a detailed case study of conflicting worldviews in 1960s American engineering to explore how engineers have acted upon differing normative visions. I argue that studying how engineers contextualize their world – particularly during moments of historical crisis – provides a source of inspiration and classroom instruction for those concerned with contemporary engineering in a global world.
This chapter was first published in Engineering in Context (Wisnioski 2009a). It appears here with updates, corrections, and minor modifications with the permission of Academica. The themes it highlights are elaborated in broader detail in Engineers for Change: Competing Visions of Technology in 1960s America (Wisnioski 2012).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alder, K. (1997). Engineering the revolution: Arms and enlightenment in France, 1763–1815. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (1971). Goals: Basis for action programs, ‘Making Technology a True Servant of Man’. Mechanical Engineering, 93(4), 16–19.
Aquarius Project. (1971). Revolutionary engineering. Spark, 1(2), 12.
ASEE Humanistic-Social Research Project. (1968). Liberal learning for the engineer. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Augustine, D. L. (2007). Red prometheus: Engineering and dictatorship in East Germany, 1945–1990. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bailes, K. E. (1978). Technology and society under Lenin and Stalin: Origins of the Soviet technical intelligentsia, 1917–1941. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Boyd, J. M. (1972). Science is dead – long live technology! Journal of Engineering Education, 62, 892–895.
Christensen, S. H., Meganck, M., & Delahousse, B. (Eds.). (2007). Philosophy in engineering. Århus: Academica.
Committee for Social Responsibility in Engineering. (1971). Spark 1, 1.
De Simone, D. V. (1968). Education for innovation. New York: Pergamon Press.
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Knopf.
Engineers Without Borders USA. (2013). http://www.ewb-usa.org
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Habermas, J. (1972). Science and technology as ideology. In B. Barnes (Ed.), Sociology of science (pp. 353–375). Baltimore: Penguin.
Harvard University Program on Technology and Society. (1972). A final review, 1964–1972. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hecht, G. (1998). The radiance of France: Nuclear power and national identity after world war II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Herf, J. (1984). Reactionary modernism: Technology, culture, and politics in Weimar and the Third Reich. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Knepler, H. (1973). Engineering education and the humanities in America. Leonardo, 6(4), 305–309.
Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Layton, E. T. (1971). Revolt of the engineers: Social responsibility and the American Engineering Profession. Cleveland: Press of Case Western Reserve University.
Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., & Elber, S. (2008). Competencies beyond countries: The re-organization of engineering education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 433–447.
Marcuse, H. (1964). One dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon.
Marine, G. (1969). America the raped: The engineering mentality and the devastation of a continent. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Marlowe, D. (1970). The new luddites. Mechanical Engineering, 92(3), 12–13.
Marx, L. (1997). Technology: The emergence of a hazardous concept. Social Research, 64(3), 965–988.
Meiksins, P., & Smith, C. (Eds.). (1996). Engineering labour: Technical workers in comparative perspective. London: Verso.
Mumford, L. (1967). The myth of the machine: Technics and human development. London: Secker & Warburg.
Mumford, L. (1970). The myth of the machine: The pentagon of power. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Grand challenges of engineering. Available at http://www.engineeringchallenges.org
National Science Foundation. (1968). Employment of scientists and engineers in the United States, 1950–1966 (No. 68–30). National Science Foundation in Cooperation with US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC.
Noble, D. F. (1977). America by design: Science, technology, and the rise of corporate capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oldenziel, R. (1999). Making technology masculine: Men, women and modern machines in America, 1870–1945. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Perrucci, R., & Gerstl, J. E. (1969). Profession without community: Engineers in American Society. New York: Random House.
Ramo, S. (1969). Cure for chaos: Fresh solutions to social problems through the systems approach. New York: D. McKay Co.
Ramo, S. (1970). Century of mismatch. New York: D. McKay Co.
Rosenstein, A. B. (1968). A study of a profession and professional education: The final publication and recommendations of the UCLA educational development program (EDP 7–68). Los Angeles: School of Engineering and Applied Science University of California.
Smith, C. E. (Ed.). (2007). Design for the other 90%. New York: Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum.
Snow, C. P. (1954). The new men. London: Macmillan.
Wakeman, R. E. (1970). Letter to the editor. Mechanical Engineering, 92(11), 70.
Waldman, T. (1971). Quest for commonwealth, an applied humanities course. In Applying humanities to engineering (pp. 1–11). Claremont: Harvey Mudd College.
White, L. T. (1967). Engineers and the making of a new humanism. Journal of Engineering Education, 57, 375–376.
Williams, R. H. (2002). Retooling: A historian confronts technological change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wisnioski, M. H. (2009a). Engineers make their own context: Vision-making in the profession. In S. H. Christensen, B. Delahousse, & M. Meganck (Eds.), Engineering in context (pp. 403–415). Århus: Academica.
Wisnioski, M. H. (2009b). “Liberal education has failed”: Reading like an engineer in 1960s America. Technology and Culture, 50(4), 753–782.
Wisnioski, M. H. (2012). Engineers for change: Competing visions of technology in 1960s America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Acknowledgments
The author thanks the editors for suggesting that the chapter be updated for a new audience, Jongmin Lee for his assistance in revisions, and Gary Downey for the spirit of communitas.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wisnioski, M. (2015). Engineers Make Their Own Context: Vision-Making in the Profession. In: Christensen, S., Didier, C., Jamison, A., Meganck, M., Mitcham, C., Newberry, B. (eds) Engineering Identities, Epistemologies and Values. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16172-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16172-3_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16171-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16172-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)