Abstract
In the context of popular peer review educational approaches, teachers wish to know whether the students are benefiting from peer reviews and applying the changes in their second drafts. This paper presents a tool for teachers that compares information about students first and second drafts of papers focusing on the extent and type of changes in the papers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Compare Suite, http://www.comparesuite.com/ (accessed January 20, 2014)
Bourdaillet, J., Ganascia, J.-G.: Medite: A unilingual textual aligner. In: Salakoski, T., Ginter, F., Pyysalo, S., Pahikkala, T. (eds.) FinTAL 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4139, pp. 458–469. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Lardilleux, A., Fleury, S., Cislaru, G.: Allongos: Longitudinal alignment for the genetic study of writers drafts. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7817, pp. 537–548. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hashemi, H.B., Schunn, C.D. (2014). A Tool for Summarizing Students’ Changes across Drafts. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_105
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_105
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07220-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07221-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)