Skip to main content

Is Our Ground-Truth for Traffic Classification Reliable?

  • Conference paper
Book cover Passive and Active Measurement (PAM 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCCN,volume 8362))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The validation of the different proposals in the traffic classification literature is a controversial issue. Usually, these works base their results on a ground-truth built from private datasets and labeled by techniques of unknown reliability. This makes the validation and comparison with other solutions an extremely difficult task. This paper aims to be a first step towards addressing the validation and trustworthiness problem of network traffic classifiers. We perform a comparison between 6 well-known DPI-based techniques, which are frequently used in the literature for ground-truth generation. In order to evaluate these tools we have carefully built a labeled dataset of more than 500 000 flows, which contains traffic from popular applications. Our results present PACE, a commercial tool, as the most reliable solution for ground-truth generation. However, among the open-source tools available, NDPI and especially Libprotoident, also achieve very high precision, while other, more frequently used tools (e.g., L7-filter) are not reliable enough and should not be used for ground-truth generation in their current form.

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under contract TEC2011-27474 (NOMADS project), by the Comissionat per a Universitats i Recerca del DIUE de la Generalitat de Catalunya (ref. 2009SGR-1140) and by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dainotti, A., et al.: Issues and future directions in traffic classification. IEEE Network 26(1), 35–40 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Valenti, S., Rossi, D., Dainotti, A., Pescapè, A., Finamore, A., Mellia, M.: Reviewing Traffic Classification. In: Biersack, E., Callegari, C., Matijasevic, M. (eds.) Data Traffic Monitoring and Analysis. LNCS, vol. 7754, pp. 123–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Fukuda, K.: Difficulties of identifying application type in backbone traffic. In: Int. Conf. on Network and Service Management (CNSM), pp. 358–361. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carela-Espñol, V., et al.: Analysis of the impact of sampling on NetFlow traffic classification. Computer Networks 55, 1083–1099 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alcock, S., et al.: Libprotoident: Traffic Classification Using Lightweight Packet Inspection. Technical report, University of Waikato (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gringoli, F., et al.: Gt: picking up the truth from the ground for internet traffic. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 39(5), 12–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dainotti, A., et al.: Identification of traffic flows hiding behind TCP port 80. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–6 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karagiannis, T., et al.: Transport layer identification of P2P traffic. In: 4th ACM Internet Measurement Conf. (IMC), pp. 121–134 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shen, C., et al.: On detection accuracy of L7-filter and OpenDPI. In: 3rd Int. Conf. on Networking and Distributed Computing (ICNDC), pp. 119–123. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alcock, S., Nelson, R.: Measuring the Accuracy of Open-Source Payload-Based Traffic Classifiers Using Popular Internet Applications. In: IEEE Workshop on Network Measurements (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dusi, M., et al.: Quantifying the accuracy of the ground truth associated with Internet traffic traces. Computer Networks 55(5), 1158–1167 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. [Online]: Traffic classification at the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, UPC (2013), http://monitoring.ccaba.upc.edu/traffic_classification

  13. Bujlow, T., et al.: Volunteer-Based System for classification of traffic in computer networks. In: 19th Telecommunications Forum TELFOR, pp. 210–213. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. [Online]: Volunteer-Based System for Research on the Internet (2012), http://vbsi.sourceforge.net/

  15. Bujlow, T., et al.: Comparison of Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) Tools for Traffic Classification. Technical report, UPC BarcelonaTech (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Carela-Español, V., Bujlow, T., Barlet-Ros, P. (2014). Is Our Ground-Truth for Traffic Classification Reliable?. In: Faloutsos, M., Kuzmanovic, A. (eds) Passive and Active Measurement. PAM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8362. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04918-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04918-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04917-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04918-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics