Skip to main content

Intimate Aesthetics and Facilitated Interaction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interactive Experience in the Digital Age

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Cultural Computing ((SSCC))

Abstract

With the recent emergence of intimate Live Art and performance practices in the past decades, involving artists and audiences interacting in close physical proximity and one-to-one communication, the body is brought centre stage as the site and material of aesthetic experience. Artists working with these modes of address aim to heighten and intensify the experience of the artwork, through the charged energy of face-to-face confrontation, exchange and close bodily proximity. Our particular interest as artistic practitioners is in intimate body-focused aesthetic experiences, mediated by digital technologies that explore the interactions between physiological processes, bodily sensation and subjectivity. In contrast to autonomous art objects that can be experienced by an individual without any assistance by others, we propose a model of aesthetic experience in which facilitation by artists and witnessing by others are integral components. The guidance and facilitation by artists through an experience is intended to provide safe structures and pathways within which a participant can surrender to the potentially immersive and reflective states of consciousness offered by the artwork. Our framework describes four stages of audience experience and participation that can be used to develop and evaluate body-based Live Art encounters: (1) Welcoming, (2) Fitting and Induction, (3) The Ride, and (4) Debriefing and Documentation. We show the application of our model through two case studies from our artistic practices, illustrating our particular perspective on evaluation as a form of facilitated critique and reflection for audience, as well as artists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramovic M, Celant G (2001) Marina Abramovic: public body: installation and objects, 1965–2001. Charta, New York/Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford S, Giannachi G, Koleva B, Rodden T (2009) From interaction to trajectories: designing coherent journeys through user experiences. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’09). ACM, New York, pp 709–718

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilda Z, Costello B, Amitani S (2006) Collaborative analysis framework for evaluating interactive art experience. J CoDesign 2(4):225–238, Taylor and Francis

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biserna E (2012) Exhibition reviews: ‘The Abramović Method’, PAC Padiglione d’Arte Contemporanea, Milan (March-June 2012), NECSUS. Eur J Media Stud 1(2):338–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop C (ed) (2006) Participation. Whitechapel Gallery/MIT Press, London/Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourriaud N (2002) Relational aesthetics. Les presses du reel (English trans), Djon

    Google Scholar 

  • Candy L (2014) Evaluation and experience in art. In: Candy L, Ferguson S (eds) Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, London, pp 25–48

    Google Scholar 

  • De Looz PA (2011) Pedro Reyes Brings Sanity to Brooklyn. In: Art in America, June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1934) Art as experience. Capricorn Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds E (2010) The art of interaction. Digit Creat 21(4):257–264

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds E (2014) Human computer interaction, experience and art. In: Candy L, Ferguson S (eds) Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, London, pp 11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlizzi J, Battarbee K (2004) Understanding experience in interactive systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing Interactive Systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS ’04). ACM, New York, pp 261–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau O (2003) Charlotte Davies: Osmose. In: Virtual art, from illusion to immersion (Revised edition MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 193–211)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heddon D, Iball H, Zerihan R (2012) Come closer: confessions of intimate spectators in one to one performance. Contemp Theatre Rev 22(1):120–133, Special issue: live art in the UK, Taylor and Francis

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höök K, Sengers P, Andersson G (2003) Sense and sensibility: evaluation and interactive art. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’03). ACM, New York, pp 241–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Khut G (2006) Interactive art as embodied enquiry: working with audience experience. In: Edmonds E, Muller L, Turnbull LD (eds) Engage: interaction, arts & audience experience. Creativity and Cognition Studios Press, Sydney, pp 156–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Khut G (2007) The heart library project. http://georgekhut.com/heartlibrary/

  • Khut G, Muller L (2005) Evolving creative practice: a reflection on working with audience experience in cardiomorphologies. In: Anastasiou P, Smithies R, Trist K, Jones L (eds) Vital signs: creative practice & new media now. RMIT Publishing, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortbek K, Grønbæk K (2008) Communicating art through interactive technology: new approaches for interaction design in art museums. In: Tollmar K, Jönsson B (eds) Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: building bridges. ACM international conference proceeding series, ACM, New York, vol 358, pp 229–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Latulipe C, Carroll EA, Lottridge D (2011) Love, hate, arousal and engagement: exploring audience responses to performing arts. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, pp 1845–1854

    Google Scholar 

  • Loke L, Khut GP, Kocaballi AB (2012) Bodily experience and imagination: designing ritual interactions for participatory live-art contexts. In: Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference (DIS ’12). ACM, New York, pp 779–788. doi: 10.1145/2317956.2318073, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2317956.2318073

  • Muller E, Robertson T, Edmonds E (2006a) The object of interaction – the role of artefacts in interaction design, experience workshops. In: Proceedings of workshop, OZCHI 2006, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller L, Turner G, Khut G, Edmonds E (2006b) Creating affective visualisations for a physiologically interactive artwork. IV 2006. Tenth international conference on information visualization, 2006, London. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 651–657

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly S (2009) The body in contemporary art. Thames & Hudson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Osthoff S (1997) Lygia Clark and Hélio Oiticica: a legacy of interactivity and participation for a telematic future. Leonardo 30:279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltz DZ (1997) The art of interaction: interactivity, performativity, and computers. J Aesthet Art Crit 55(2, Spring): 117–127, Perspectives on the arts and technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechner R (2003) Performance theory. Routledge Classics, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman R (2000) Performing live: aesthetic alternatives for the ends of art. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenslie S (2010) Virtual touch – a study of the user and experience of touch in artistic, multimodal and computer-based environments. Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenslie S (2010) The blind theatre – 5 manifests for the female sensuality [Online]. Available: http://blindtheater.wordpress.com

  • Turner V (1982) From ritual to theatre: the human seriousness of play. PAJ Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gennep A (1960) The rites of passage. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. Reprint 1977. Originally published 1960

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergine L (2000) Body art and performance. Skira Editore, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr T, Jones A (2000) The artist’s body. Phaidon Press Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerihan R (2009) One to one performance: a study room guide. Live Art Development Agency, London. Available at: http://www.thisisliveart.co.uk/resources/catalogue/rachel-zerihans-study-room-guide. Accessed 20 Feb 2014

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lian Loke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loke, L., Khut, G.P. (2014). Intimate Aesthetics and Facilitated Interaction. In: Candy, L., Ferguson, S. (eds) Interactive Experience in the Digital Age. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04510-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04510-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04509-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04510-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics