Skip to main content

Introduction: Interdisciplinary Dialogues and Methodological Debates

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace ((MIGST,volume 14))

Abstract

Over the last two decades, the volume of academic publications and news articles on migrations around the world has been remarkable. The acceleration of human mobilities is inherent to the current stage of the globalization process. In academic and political spheres, the topic has been the focus of numerous seminars and debates on the impacts, effects and consequences accompanying these international processes of accelerated migrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There are, of course, notable exceptions. See, for example, some recent publications that manage to achieve this exercise: Masseroni (2007); De Sipio et al. (2007); Ariza and Velasco (2012).

  2. 2.

    The methodological guidelines developed and circulated prior to each Seminar session made it possible for documents to be read before the session and organized around defined focuses of discussion, and facilitated the systematization of debates among researchers. In addition, because topic and problem-based minutes were taken of each Seminar session, the most relevant debates were systematized and the pending tasks and commitments made by each research team at the end of work sessions were identified. These minutes were taken by a person outside the Seminar group and were sent to participants in the days following the work sessions. These minutes constitute a valuable record of the discussions among participants.

  3. 3.

    This practical modality of interdisciplinary work is notably illustrated in the chapter in this book by Coubes, Velasco and Zlolniski.

References

  • Ariza, Marina, Alejandro Portes, 2007: El País Transnacional (Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariza, Marina; Velasco, Laura, 2012: Métodos cualitativos y su aplicación empírica. Por los caminos de la investigación sobre migración internacional (Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-El Colegio de la Frontera Norte).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomraad, Irene, 2007: “Of Puzzles and Serendipity: Doing Research with cross-national comparisons and Mixed methods”, in: De Sipio, Lois; García y Griego, Manuel; Kossoudji, Sherri (Eds.): Researching Migration. Stories from the field (New York: The Social Science Research Council); at: http://www.ssrc.org/pubs/researching_migration.pdf.

  • Bourdieu, Pierre, 1976 [first Spanish Ed., 2000]: “El campo científico”, in: Bourdieu, Pierre, 2000: Los usos sociales de la ciencia. Por una sociología clínica del campo científico, (Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Visión).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre, 1984 [first Spanish Ed., 2008]: Homo Academicus (Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI editores).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brettell, Caroline B.; Hollifield, James F., 2000: “Introduction. Migration Theory. Talking across disciplines,” in: Brettell, Caroline B.; Hollifield, James F. (Eds.): Migration Theory. Talking across disciplines (New York: Routledge): 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, Alan, 2007: “The Research Question in Social Research: What is its role?”, in: International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10,1 (February): 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Stephen; Delgado Wise, Raúl (Eds.), 2007: Migración y desarrollo: perspectivas desde el sur (México: Miguel Angel Porrúa – Zacatecas: Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corona Berkin, Sarah; Kaltmeier, Olaf, 2012: En diálogo. Metodologías horizontales en Ciencias Sociales y Culturales (Barcelona: Gedisa Editorial, Col. Herramientas Universitarias).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sipio, Louis; García y Griego, Manuel; Kossoudji, Sherri (Eds.), 2007: Researching Migration. Stories from the field (New York: The Social Science Research Council); at: http://www.ssrc.org/pubs/researching_migration.pdf.

  • Feldman, Bela; Rivera-Sánchez, Liliana; Stefoni, Carolina; Villa, Marta Inés, 2011: La construcción social del sujeto migrante en América Latina. Prácticas, representaciones y estrategias (Quito, Ecuador: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales – Universidad A. Hurtado de Chile).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foner, Nancy; Rumbaut, Rubén; Gold, Steve (Eds.), 2000: Immigration Research for a New Century. Multidisciplinary Perspectives (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick Schiller, Nina; Basch, Linda; Szanton, C. Blanc, 1992: Towards a Transnational Perspective on Migration: Race, Class, Ethnicity and Nationalism Reconsidered (New York: New York Academy of Sciences).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick Schiller, Nina; Levitt, Peggy, 2006: Haven´t we heard this somewhere before? A substantive view of Transnational Migration Studies by way of a reply to Waldinger and Fitzgerald, Working Paper No. 06-01, The Center for Migration and Development, Working paper series (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick Schiller, Nina, 2004: “Transnationality”, in: Nugent, David; Vincent, Joan (Eds.): A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics (London: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick Schiller, Nina, 2007: Beyond the Nation-State and its Units of Analysis: Toward a New Research Agenda for Migration Studies. Essentials of Migration Theory, Working Paper No. 33, (Berlin: Germany: Center on Migration, Citizenship and Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick Schiller, Nina; Faist; Thomas; 2010: Migration, Development and Transnationalization. A Forum for Social Analysis, Vol. 12 (New York: Berghahn Books),

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick Schiller, Nina; Caglar, Ayse, 2011: Locating Migration. Rescaling Cities and Migrants (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • González Casanova, Pablo, 2004: Las nuevas ciencias y las humanidades. De la Academia a la política (Barcelona: Anthropos/Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales-UNAM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Breda, 2008: “Putting Emotion and Reflexivity to work in Researching Migration”, in: Sociology, 42,5 (October): 935–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel, Ramón, 2006: “La descolonización de la Economía Política y los estudios postcoloniales: transmodernidad, pensamiento fronterizo y colonialidad global”, in: Tabula Rasa (January–June), No. 4, (Bogotá, Colombia Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca): 17–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltmeier, Olaf, 2012: “Hacia la descolonización de las metodologías: reciprocidad, horizontalidad y poder”, in: Corona Berkin, Sarah; Kaltmeier, Olaf (Eds.): En diálogo. Metodologías horizontales en Ciencias Sociales y Culturales (Barcelona: Gedisa Editorial, Col. Herramientas Universitarias): 25–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khagram; Sanjeev; Levitt, Peggy, 2008: The Transnational Studies Reader (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas, 1962, 2006: La estructura de las revoluciones científicas (Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica).

    Google Scholar 

  • Masseroni, Susana (Ed.), 2007: Interpretando la experiencia. Estudios cualitativos en ciencias sociales (Buenos Aires: Colección Investigación y Tesis Mnemosyne).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawska, Ewa, 2003: “Disciplinary Agendas and Analytic Strategies of Research on Immigrant Transnationalism: Challenges of Interdisciplinary Knowledge”, in: The International Migration Review, 37,3 (Fall): 611–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Belinda; Van de Bunt, Gerhard G.; de Brujin, Jeanne, 2006: “Comparative Research: Persistent Problems and Promising Solutions”, in: International Sociology, 21,5: 619–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.; Leech, Nancy L., 2005: “On Becoming a Pragmatic Researcher: The importance of Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methodologies”, in: International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8,5: 375–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pries, Ludger (Ed.), 2008: Rethinking Transnationalism. The Meso-link of Organization (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam; Teune, Henry, 1970: The logic of comparative social inquiry (New York: Wiley-Interscience).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, Aníbal, 2000: “Colonialidad del poder y clasificación social”, in: Journal of World-Systems Research, Vol. 6 (summer/fall): 342–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, Charles, 2006: “How to Lure Analytic Social Science out of the Doldrums: some lessons from Comparative Research”, in: International Sociology, 21,5: 633–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, Ileana; Martínez, Josebe (Eds.), 2008: Postcolonialidades históricas: (in)visibilidades hispanoamericanas/colonialismos ibéricos (Barcelona: Anthropos-Colección Pensamiento crítico-pensamiento utópico).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siltanen, Janet; Willis, Alette; Scobie, Willow, 2008: “Separately Together: Working Reflexively as a Team”, in: International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11,1 (February): 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, Neil J., 2002:“On comparative analysis, interdisciplinarity and internationalization in Sociology”, in: International Sociology, 18,4: 643–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldinger, Roger; Fitzgerald, David, 2004: “Transnationalism in Question”, in: American Journal of Sociology, 109,5: 1177–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldinger, Roger, 2008: “Between “Here” and “There”: Immigrant Cross-Border Activities and Loyalties”, in: International Migration Review, 42,1 (Spring): 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, Andreas; Glick Schiller, Nina, 2003: “Methodological Nationalism, the Social Sciences, and the Study of Migration: an Essay in Historical Epistemology”, in: International Migration Review, 37,3: 576–610.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liliana Rivera-Sánchez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rivera-Sánchez, L., Lozano-Ascencio, F. (2014). Introduction: Interdisciplinary Dialogues and Methodological Debates. In: Rivera-Sánchez, L., Lozano-Ascencio, F. (eds) The Practice of Research on Migration and Mobilities. SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace(), vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02693-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics