Abstract
Ants balance the use of remembered private information and communicated public information to maximally exploit resources. This work determines how the strategy that best balances these two sources of information, and the performance of that best strategy, depend on the information in the distribution that is available to be exploited, and the number of ants in the colony. We answer this question by (1) measuring the rates at which ants foraging for seeds in manipulative field studies, (2) simulating ant foraging strategies and measuring resulting foraging performance, and (3) implementing foraging strategies as algorithms for search behaviors in teams of cooperatively searching robots.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beverly BD, McLendon H, Nacu S, Holmes S, Gordon DM (2009) How site fidelity leads to individual differences in the foraging activity of harvester ants. Behav Ecol 20(3):633–638
Crist TO, MacMahon JA (1991) Individual foraging components of harvester ants: movement patterns and seed patch fidelity. Insectes Soc 38(4):379–396
Dall SRX, Giraldeau L, Olsson O, McNamara JM, Stephens DW (2005) Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 20(4):187–193
Dorigo M, Sahin E (2004) Swarm robotics—special issue editorial. Auton Robots 17(2–3):111–113
Dorigo MV et al. (2004) Evolving self-organizing behaviors for a swarm-bot. Auton Robots 17(2):223–245
Flanagan TP, Letendre K, Burnside W, Fricke GM, Moses M (2011) How ants turn information into food. In: IEEE symposium on artificial life (ALIFE), pp 178–185
Flanagan TP, Letendre K, Moses ME (2012) Quantifying the effect of colony size and food distribution on harvester ant foraging. PLoS ONE 7(7):e39427
Haefner JW, Crist TO (1994) Spatial model of movement and foraging in harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex) (I): the roles of memory and communication. J Theor Biol 166:299–313
Hecker JP, Letendre K, Stolleis K, Washington D, Moses ME (2012) Formica ex machina: ant swarm foraging from physical to virtual and back again. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on swarm intelligence, Brussels. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7461
Holldobler B (1976) Recruitment behavior, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1(1):3–44
Letendre K, Moses ME (2012, in review) Synergy in ant foraging strategies: memory and communication alone and in combination. Unpublished
Banavar JR, Moses ME, Brown JH, Damuth J, Rinaldo A, Sibly RM, Maritan A (2010) A general basis for quarter power scaling in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(36):15816–158120
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Moses, M.E., Letendre, K., Hecker, J.P., Flanagan, T.P. (2013). In vivo, in silico, in machina: Ants and Robots Balance Memory and Communication to Collectively Exploit Information. In: Gilbert, T., Kirkilionis, M., Nicolis, G. (eds) Proceedings of the European Conference on Complex Systems 2012. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00395-5_76
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00395-5_76
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00394-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00395-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)