Skip to main content

Using Activity Theory and Task Structure Charts to Model Patient-Introduced Online Health Information into the Family Physician/Patient Examination Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1309 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1130))

Abstract

This research study was undertaken to gain a richer understanding of the use of patient-introduced online health information during the physician/patient examination and communication process. Utilizing qualitative data obtained from ten family physician interviews and workflow modeling of the data using activity diagrams and task structure charts, this study uncovered the frequency of patient-introduced online health information, physician suggested online resources, use of email for physician/patient communication, use of electronic medical records, along with tasks involved and methods used by the physicians to work the online health information into the physician/patient examination and knowledge transfer process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aarts, J., van der Sijs, H.: CPOE, alerts and workflow: taking stock of ten years research at Erasmus MC. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 148, 165–169 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahern, D.: Challenges and opportunities of eHealth research. Am. J. Prev. Med. 32, 75–85 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahluwalia, S., Murry, E., Stevenson, F., Kerr, C., Burns, J.: ‘A heartbeat moment’: qualitative study of GP views of patients bringing health information from the internet to a consultation. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 60, 88–94 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmad, F., Hudak, P., Bercovitz, K., Hollenberg, E., Levinson, W.: Are physicians ready for patients with Internet-based health information? J. Med. Internet Res. 8, e22 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Babbie, E.: The Practice of Social Research. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ball, M., Lillis, J.: E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. Int. J. Med. Inform. 61, 1–10 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blumenthal, D.: Implementation of the federal health information technology initiative. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 2426–2431 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brann, M., Anderson, J.: E-Medicine and health care consumers: recognizing current problems and possible resolutions for a safer environment. Health Care Anal. 10, 403–415 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks, L., Griffin, T.: Is it time for a new practice environment? An operational look at your practice. J. Med. Pract. Manag. 25, 307–310 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Health Literacy (2011). http://www.cdc.gov/HealthLiteracy/. Accessed 9 Oct 2011

  11. Dugdale, D., Epstein, R., Pantilat, S.: Time and the patient-physician relationship. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 14, S34–S40 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Elcin, M., Odabasi, O., Gokler, B., Sayek, I., Akova, M., Kiper, N.: Developing and evaluating professionalism. Med. Teach. 28, 36–39 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elkin, N.: How America Searches: Health and Wellness. iCrossing, Inc., pp. 1–17 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Engeström, Y.: Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Engeström, Y.: Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics 43(7), 960–974 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eudy, K.: Google second only to doctors as source of health information. Capstrat and Public Policy Polling (2010). http://www.capstrat.com/news/google-second-only-doctors-source-health-information/. Accessed 31 May 2010

  17. Fowler, F.J.: Survey Research Methods. Sage, Los Angeles (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fox, S., Rainie, L.: The online health care revolution: how the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Pew Internet & American Life Project (2000). http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Health_Report.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2008

  19. Freed, G., Stockman, J.: Oversimplifying primary care supply and shortages. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 301, 1920–1922 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Keselman, A., Logan, R., Smith, C., Leroy, G., Zeng-Treitler, Q.: Developing informatics tools and strategies for consumer-centered health communication. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 15, 473–483 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, K., Kim, S.: Physicians’ perception of the effects of Internet health information on the doctor-patient relationship. Inform. Health Soc. Care 34, 136–148 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kreuter, M., McClure, S.: The role of culture in health communication. Annu. Rev. Public Health 25, 439–455 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. NC Medical Board (North Carolina Medical Board) (2011). http://www.ncmedboard.org. Accessed 19 Nov 2011

  24. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rauh, S., Wadsworth, E., Weeks, W., Weinstein, J.: The savings illusion – why clinical quality improvement fails to deliver bottom – line results. N. Engl. J. Med. e48, 1–3 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stevenson, W.: Operations Management. McGraw-Hill, Boston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Trist, E., Murray, H.: Historical overview. In: The Social Engagement of Social Science: A Tavistock Anthology. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 1–34 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  28. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services: National Plan to Improve Health Literacy (2010). http://www.health.gov/communication/HLActionPlan/pdf/Health_Literacy_Action_Plan.pdf. Accessed 9 Oct 2011

  29. Wensing, M., Wollershiem, H., Grol, R.: Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: a structured review of reviews. Implement. Sci. 1, 2 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beth Ellington .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: Physician Interview Questions

Appendix A: Physician Interview Questions

Thank you for participating in this interview today. This interview should take approximately 30 min to complete. I would like to assure you that all of your responses will remain confidential. You will be assigned a participant code that will be used to maintain your anonymity. Your participant code for this study is FP###.

(Hand the participant the confidentiality agreement to read and sign with their participant code already entered on the form.)

By signing the confidentiality agreement you have agreed that your responses may be recorded on audiotape and you are guaranteed that no personally identifiable information will be linked to your recorded responses. (Turn on tape recorder.)

Interview Questions

  1. 1.

    How would you describe your practice of medicine? Probe if necessary: for example private practice, hospital, medical school

  2. 2.

    Do you communicate with your patients via email? Probe: Why or why not?

  3. 3.

    Does your practice use electronic medical records? Probe: Why or why not?

  4. 4.

    How many days a week do you schedule patient appointments?

  5. 5.

    How many patients do you see each week?

  6. 6.

    What does the phrase “patient health literacy” mean to you? Probe: Are you concerned about your patients’ health literacy?

  7. 7.

    List the steps you follow when interacting with a patient from the time you enter the examination room until you exit the room. Probe for tools: Do you use a computer in the examining room? Do you use medical instruments such as blood pressure monitor, stethoscope, ear scope, tongue suppressor? Do you reference their medical record, lab results, diagnostic tests results? Do you talk to the patient? Do you talk to the patient’s family if they are present? Do you record information into their medical record?

  8. 8.

    What is the main focus of your activity during the patient’s examination in the steps you listed above? Probe if needed: the patient, the patient’s health, diagnosis of the problem, other?

  9. 9.

    What is the main result or outcome you hope to have achieved when you exit the patient examination room? Probe: If more than one is mentioned.

  10. 10.

    In the past 7 days have any of your patients brought health information they found on the internet to their examination? (If no, then past 30 days? If no, then past 60 days? If no then omit questions 11 and 12.)

  11. 11.

    (If yes in #10 then ask), Was the health information your patient found on the internet directly related to their disease or health condition?

  12. 12.

    Did you discuss the information with your patient?

  13. 13.

    (If yes in #12 then ask), Where did the discussion occur in the steps outlined in the generic patient examination activity above?

  14. 14.

    How many employees other than physicians do you work with in your practice?

  15. 15.

    What are the titles of these employees? (Probe: i.e. nurses, nurse practitioners, physician’s assistants, administrative assistants, medical technologists?)

  16. 16.

    How do these other employees support the activity of examining patients?

  17. 17.

    Does your practice have a policy to refer patients to internet health information? (If no, omit questions 18 and 19.)

  18. 18.

    (If yes in #17 then ask),Who is designated to refer the patient to internet health information in your practice? Probe: Where/How does this occur? During examination, after examination, follow-up visit, sent to patient later?

  19. 19.

    In what format do they give the suggested resources to the patient? (Probe: word document?, brochure?, email attachment?, information prescription?)

  20. 20.

    Other than local, state, HIPAA and other federal laws what additional rules, guidelines, policies or procedures are you expected to follow when examining patients?

I would also like to ask you a few more questions to allow me to better understand the characteristics of my interviewees.

  1. 21.

    In what year were you born?

  2. 22.

    In what year did you start practicing medicine?

(Questions for the interviewer to answer by observation if possible)

  1. 23.

    What is the interviewee’s gender?

  2. 24.

    What is interviewee’s race?

Thank you for agreeing to participate in this interview. (Ask if they would be willing to complete a brief online survey in the future relating to internet health information. If so, then ask them for their email address to send them the survey link or give them a printed copy of the survey link on the signed confidentiality form.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ellington, B. (2020). Using Activity Theory and Task Structure Charts to Model Patient-Introduced Online Health Information into the Family Physician/Patient Examination Process. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds) Advances in Information and Communication. FICC 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1130. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39442-4_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics