Abstract
Resilience is an important property of real-world complex networks with many applications in technological, biological, and social systems. While many natural systems are particularly resilient, some are antifragile, namely, they become stronger when being subjected to attacks, volatility, or errors. In this paper, we consider an edge-attack and local edge-repair response mechanism over several synthetic and real-world datasets, on which we quantify both antifragility (as the dynamics of the largest connected component) and the cost incurred by edge repairs. Our findings show that (1) random repairs generate a stronger antifragile response, thus confirming that antifragility manifests itself in the context of random, rather than deterministic events; and (2) antifragile behavior is fostered by strongly clustered topologies (e.g., real-world networks and the synthetic Watts–Strogatz model with degree distribution). Our results represent a first step towards designing highly resilient networks and developing new methods for thwarting the antifragile response of harmful and hostile systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Available at http://networkrepository.com/power.php.
- 2.
Available at http://networkrepository.com/tech-routers-rf.php.
- 3.
Available at https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~enron/.
- 4.
Available at http://networkrepository.com/ia-crime-moreno.php.
- 5.
Available at https://snap.stanford.edu/data/ego-Twitter.html.
References
Taleb, N.N.: Antifragile: How to Live in a World We Don’t Understand. Allen Lane, London (2012)
Taleb, N.N., Douady, R.: Mathematical definition, mapping, and detection of (anti) fragility. Quant. Financ. 13(11), 1677–1689 (2013)
Danchin, A., Binder, P.M., Noria, S.: Antifragility and tinkering in biology (and in business) flexibility provides an efficient epigenetic way to manage risk. Genes 2(4), 998–1016 (2011)
Derbyshire, J., Wright, G.: Preparing for the future: development of an ‘antifragile’ methodology that complements scenario planning by omitting causation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 82, 215–225 (2014)
Ren, X.-L., Gleinig, N., Helbing, D., Antulov-Fantulin, N.: Generalized network dismantling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116(14), 6554–6559 (2019)
Bright, D., Greenhill, C., Britz, T., Ritter, A., Morselli, C.: Criminal network vulnerabilities and adaptations. Global Crime 18(4), 424–441 (2017)
Duxbury, S.W., Haynie D.L.: Criminal network security: an agent-based approach to evaluating network resilience. Criminology 57(2), 314–342 (2019)
Gatenby, R.A., Silva, A.S., Gillies, R.J., Frieden, B.R.: Adaptive therapy. Cancer Res. 69(11), 4894–4903 (2009)
Lichtman, M., Vondal, M.T., Clancy, T.C., Reed, J.H.: Antifragile communications. IEEE Syst. J. 12(1), 659–670 (2018)
Abid, A., Khemakhem, M.T., Marzouk, S., Jemaa, M.B., Monteil, T., Drira, K.: Toward antifragile cloud computing infrastructures. Prog. Comput. Sci. 32, 850–855 (2014)
Fang, Y., Sansavini, G.: Emergence of antifragility by optimum postdisruption restoration planning of infrastructure networks. J. Inf. Syst. 23(4), 04017024 (2017)
Mujumdar, A., Mohalik, S.K., Badrinath R.: Antifragility for intelligent autonomous systems (2018). arXiv: 1802.09159
Jones, K.H.: Engineering antifragile systems: a change in design philosophy. Proc. Comput. Sci. 32, 870–875 (2014)
Basiri, A., Behnam, N., De Rooij, R., Hochstein, L., Kosewski, L., Reynolds, J., Rosenthal, C.: Chaos engineering. IEEE Softw. 33(3), 35–41 (2016)
Topirceanu, A., Udrescu M.: Topological fragility versus antifragility: understanding the impact of real-time repairs in networks under targeted attacks. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pp. 1215–1222. IEEE, Barcelona (2018)
He, S., Li, S., Ma, H.: Effect of edge removal on topological and functional robustness of complex networks. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 388(11), 2243–2253 (2009)
Piraveenan, M., Thedchanamoorthy, G., Uddin, S., Chung, K.S.K.: Quantifying topological robustness of networks under sustained targeted attacks. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3, 939–952 (2013)
Sun, W., Zeng, A.,: Target recovery in complex networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 90(1), 10 (2017)
Iyer, S., Killingback, T., Sundaram, B., Wang, Z.: Attack robustness and centrality of complex networks. PLoS One 8, e59613 (2013)
Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barabási, A.-L.: Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406(6794), 378 (2000)
Crucitti, P., Latora, V., Marchiori, M., Rapisarda, A.: Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 340(1–3), 388–394 (2004)
Callaway, D.S., Newman, M.E.J., Strogatz, S.H., Watts, D.J.: Network robustness and fragility: percolation on random graphs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(25), 5468–5471 (2000)
Wang, X.F., Chen, G.: Synchronization in scale-free dynamical networks: robustness and fragility. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Fund. Theory Appl. 49(1), 54–62 (2002)
Vespignani, A.: Complex networks: the fragility of interdependency. Nature 464(7291), 984 (2010)
Wang, X.F., Chen, G.: Complex networks: small-world, scale-free and beyond. IEEE Circ. Syst. Mag. 3(1), 6–20 (2003)
Chen, Y.W., Zhang, L.F., Huang, J.P.: The Watts–Strogatz network model developed by including degree distribution: theory and computer simulation. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 40(29), 8237 (2007)
Rossi, R., Ahmed, N.: The network data repository with interactive graph analytics and visualization (2015). http://networkrepository.com
Makse, H.: Software and data. http://www-levich.engr.ccny.cuny.edu/webpage/hmakse/software-and-data/
Leskovec, J., Mcauley, J.J.: Learning to discover social circles in ego networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 539–547 (2012)
Barabási, A.L.: Network Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)
Brandes, U.: A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J. Math. Sociol. 25(2), 163–177 (2001)
Dekker, A.H.: Realistic social networks for simulation using network rewiring. In: International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, pp. 677–683 (2007)
Pósfai, M., Liu, Y.Y., Slotine, J.J., Barabási, A.L.: Effect of correlations on network controllability. Sci. Rep. 3, 1067 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Topîrceanu, A., Udrescu, M., Mărculescu, R. (2020). Complex Networks Antifragility under Sustained Edge Attack-Repair Mechanisms. In: Masuda, N., Goh, KI., Jia, T., Yamanoi, J., Sayama, H. (eds) Proceedings of NetSci-X 2020: Sixth International Winter School and Conference on Network Science. NetSci-X 2020. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38965-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38965-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38964-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38965-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)