Skip to main content

Imaginative Processes and Generalization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Theory of Imagining, Knowing, and Understanding

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSTHEORET))

  • 447 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a history of the concept of imagination from ancient Greece to contemporary Western world. It introduces the main theoretical framework and authors, who are used in this book to develop the concept of imaginative processes as higher mental function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Abduction is a particular form of inference: “Since Peirce’s theorization, scientific knowledge creation is understood as a triadic process of hypothesizing, modeling, and proving [.] Each step is characterized by a leading inferential structure, namely abduction to speculate on new hypotheses, deduction to draw the possible consequences and relationship and induction to prove the hypothesis. A theory can be said to be established when the knowledge achieves a character of generalization” (Tateo 2015, p. 48).

  2. 2.

    Dazzani and Silva Filho (2019) systematically explore this idea in commentary 1, with reference to Peirce’s theory of knowledge.

References

  • Branco, A., & Valsiner, J. (1997). Changing methodologies: A co-constructivist study of goal orientations in social interactions. Psychol. Dev. Soc., 9(1), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/097133369700900103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropper, W. H. (2001). Great Physicists: The Life and Times of Leading Physicists from Galileo to Hawking. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dazzani, V., & Silva Filho, W. (2019). “Don’t block the path of inquiry”: Imagination, inquiry, and knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frappier, M., Meynell, L., & Brown, J. R. (Eds.). (2012). Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Science, and the Arts. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendler, T. S. (2000). Thought Experiment: On the Powers and Limits of Imaginary Cases. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapoujade, M. N. (1988). Filosofía de la imaginación. In Cerro del agua. Mexico: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, J. W. (2012). Thought experiment and the exercise of imagination in science. In M. Frappier, L. Meynell, & J. R. Brown (Eds.), Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Science, and the Arts (pp. 11–29). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miščević, N. (2012). Political thought experiments from Plato to Rawls. In M. Frappier, L. Meynell, & J. R. Brown (Eds.), Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Science, and the Arts (pp. 191–206). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J. D. (2012). Chasing the light. Einstein’s Most famous thought experiment. In M. Frappier, L. Meynell, & J. R. Brown (Eds.), Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Science, and the Arts (pp. 123–140). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelaprat, E., & Cole, M. (2011). “Minding the gap”: Imagination, creativity and human cognition. Integr. Psychol. Behav. Sci., 45(4), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepper, D. L. (2013). Understanding Imagination. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317–1323. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3629243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tateo, L. (2015). The nature of generalization in psychology. In G. Marsico, R. A. Ruggieri, & S. Salvatore (Eds.), Reflexivity and Psychology (pp. 45–64). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tateo, L. (2016). What imagination can teach us about higher mental functions. In J. Valsiner, G. Marsico, N. Chaudhary, T. Sato, & V. Dazzani (Eds.), Psychology as the Science of Human Being: The Yokohama Manifesto (pp. 149–164). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tateo, L. (2017). Poetic destroyers. Vico, Emerson and the aesthetic dimension of experiencing. Cult. Psychol., 23(3), 337–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tateo, L. (2018). Affective semiosis and affective logic. New Ideas Psychol., 48, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (2013). A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2017). From Methodology to Methods in Human Psychology. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. J. Russ. East. Eur. Psychol., 42(1), 7–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Gribbin, J. (2002). Stephen Hawking: A Life in Science. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tateo, L. (2020). Imaginative Processes and Generalization. In: A Theory of Imagining, Knowing, and Understanding. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38025-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics