Abstract
This chapter describes the application of the finite element (FE) method to bone tissues. The aspects that differ the most between bone and other materials’ FE analysis are the type of elements used, constitutive models and experimental validation. These aspects are observed from a historical evolution point of view. Several types of elements can be used to simulate similar bone structures, and within the same analysis, many types of elements may be needed to realistically simulate an anatomical part. Special attention is made to constitutive models, including the use of density–elasticity relationships enabled through CT scanned images. Other more complex models are also described, such as viscoelastic and anisotropic models. The importance of experimental validation is discussed, describing several methods used by different authors in this challenging field. The use of cadaveric human bones is not always possible or desirable and other options are described, as the use of animal or artificial bones. Strain and strain rate measuring methods are also discussed, such as rosette strain gauges and optical devices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Brekelmans W, Poort H, Slooff T (1972) A new method to analyse the mechanical behavior of skeletal parts. Acta Orthop Scand 43:301–317
Ascenzi A (1993) Biomechanics and galileo galilei. J Biomech 26(2):95–100
Huiskes R, Chao E (1983) A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: the first decade. J Biomech 16(6):385–409
Taylor M, Prendergast P (2015) Four decades of finite element analysis of orthopaedic devices: where are we now and what are the opportunities. J Biomech 48:767–778
Schmidt H, Galbusera F, Rohlmann A, Shirazi-Adl A (2013) What have we learned from finite element model studies of lumbar intervertebral discs in the past four decades? J Biomech 46:2342–2355
Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, Pintar F, Maiman D (1999) Finite element modeling of the cervical spine: role of the intervertebral disc under axial and eccentric loads. Med Eng Phys 21:689–700
Zander T, Rohlmann A, Calisse J, Bergmann G (2001) Estimation of muscle forces in the lumbar spine during upper-body inclination. Clin Biomech 16(1):S73–S80
Schmidt H et al (2007) Application of a calibration method provides more realistic results for a finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment. Clin Biomech 22:377–384
Papaioannou G et al (2008) Patient-specific knee joint finite element model validation with high-accuracy kinematics from biplane dynamic Roentgen. J Biomech 41:2633–2638
Faizan A et al (2009) Do design variations in the artificial disc influence cervical spine biomechanics? A finite element investigation. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl. 5):S653–S662
Wolfram U, Wilke H, Zysset P (2010) Valid u finite element models of vertebral trabecular bone can be obtained using tissue properties measured with nanoindentation under wet conditions. J Biomech 43:1731–1737
Zhang J, Wang F, Zhou RXQ (2011) A three-dimensional finite element model of the cervical spine: an investigation of whiplash injury. Med Biol Eng Comput 49:193–201
Niemeyer F, Wilke H, Schmidt H (2012) Geometry strongly influences the response of numerical models of the lumbar spine—a probabilistic finite element analysis. J Biomech 45:1414–1423
Kinzl M, Wolfram U, Pahr D (2013) Identification of a crushable foam material model and application to strength and damage prediction of human femur and vertebral body. J Mech Beha Biom Mat 26:136–147
Liu S et al (2014) Effect of bone material properties on effective region in screw-bone model: an experimental and finite element study. Biomed Eng Onl 13:83
Lughmani W, Marouf K, Ashcroft I (2015) Drilling in cortical bone: a finite element model and experimental investigations. J Mech Beha Biom Mat 42:32–42
Donald B (2011) Pracrical stress analysis with finite elements, 2nd edn. Glasnevin Publishing, Dublin
Burkhart T, Andrews D, Dunning C (2013) Finite element modeling mesh quality, energy balance and validation methods: a review with recommendations associated with the modeling of bone tissue. J Biomech 46:1477–1488
Gu K, Li L (2011) A human knee joint model considering fluid pressure and fiber orientation in cartilages and menisci. Med Eng Phys 33:497–503
Evans S et al (2012) Finite element analysis of a micromechanical model of bone and a new approach to validation. J Biomech 45:2702–2705
Hussain M et al (2012) Corpectomy versus discectomy for the treatment of multilevel cervical spine pathology: a finite element model analysis. Spine J. 12:401–408
Parr W et al (2013) Finite element micro-modelling of a human ankle bone reveals the importance of the trabecular network to mechanical performance: new methods for generation and comparison of 3D models. J Biomech 46:200–205
Taddei F et al (2006) Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: an in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy. J Biomech 39:2457–2467
Austman R, Milner J, Holdsworth D, Dunning C (2008) The effect of the density-modulus relationship selected to apply material properties in a finite element model of long bone. J Biomech 41:3172–3176
Nazemi S et al (2015) Prediction of proximal tibial subchondral bone structural stiffness using subject-specific finite element modelling: effect of selected density-modulus relationship. Clin Biomech 30:703–712
Denozière G, Ku D (2006) Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. J Biomech 39:766–775
Ezquerro F et al (2011) Calibration of the finite element model of a lumbar functional spinal unit using an optimization technique based on differential evolution. Med Eng Phys 33:89–95
Beillas P, Lee S, Tashman S, Yang K (2007) Sensitivity of the tibio-femoral response to finite element modeling parameters. Comp Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 10(3):209–221
Bowden A et al (2008) Quality of motion considerations in numerical analysis of motion restoring implants of the spine. Clin Biomech 23:536–544
Little J, Adam C (2011) Effects of surgical joint destabilization on load sharing between ligamentous structures in the thoracic spine: a finite element investigation. Clin Biomech 26:895–903
Dong L et al (2013) Development and validation of a 10-year-old child ligamentous cervical spine finite element model. A Biomed Eng 41(12):2538–2552
Wang W, Zhang H, Sadeghipour K, Baran G (2013) Effect of posterolateral disc replacement on kinematics and stress distribution in the lumbar spine: a finite element study. Med Eng Phys 35:357–364
Bendjaballah M, Shirazi-Adl A, Zukor D (1995) Biomechanics of the human knee joint in compression: reconstruction, mesh generation and finite element analysis. Knee 2(2):69–79
Moglo K, Shirazi-Adl A (2003) On the coupling between anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments, and knee joint response under anterior femoral drawer in flexion: a finite element study. Clin Biomech 18:751–759
Donahue T, Hull M, Rashid M, Jacobs C (2003) How the stiffness of meniscal attachments and meniscal material properties affect tibio-femoral contact pressure computed using a validated finite element model of the human knee joint. J Biomech 36:19–34
Ramaniraka N, Terrier A, Theumann N, Siegrist O (2005) Effects of the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the biomechanics of the knee joint: a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 20:434–442
Peña E, Calvo B, Martínez M, Doblaré M (2006) A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the combined behavior of ligaments and menisci in the healthy human knee joint. J Boimech 39:1686–1701
Li L, Cheung J, Herzog W (2009) Three-dimensional fibril-reinforced finite element model of articular cartilage. Med Biol Eng Comput 47:607–615
Rohlmann A, Boustani H, Bergmann G, Zander T (2010) Effect of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics: A probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis. J Biomech 43:2963–2969
Yue-fu D et al (2011) Accurate 3D reconstruction of subject-specific knee finite element model to simulate the articular cartilage defects. J Shang Jiaot Univ (Sci) 16(5):620–627
Carter D, Hayes W (1977) The compressive behaviour of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg 954–962
Cowin SC (2001) Bone mechanics handbook, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Mow V, Huiskes R (2005) Basic orthopaedic biomechanics and mechano-biology, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Dempster W, Liddicoat R (1952) Compact bone as a non-isotropic material. Am J Anat 91(3):331–362
Huiskes R, Janssen J, Slooff T (1981) A detailed comparison of experimental and theoretical stress-analyses of a human femur. Mech Proper Bone 45:211–234
Brown T, Ferguson A (1980) Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur. Acta Orthop Scand 51:429–437
Taylor M et al (1995) Cancellous bone stresses surrounding the femoral component of a hip prosthesis: an elastic-plastic finite element analysis. Med Eng Phys 17:544–550
Kopperdahl D, Keaveny T (1998) Yield strain behaviour of trabecular bone. J Biomech 31:601–608
Morgan E, Keaveny T (2001) Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomical site. J Biomech 34:569–577
Chang W et al (1999) Uniaxial yield strains for bovine trabecular bone are isotropic and asymmetric. J Orthop Res 17:582–585
Iyo T et al (2004) Anisotropic viscoelastic properties of cortical bone. J Biomech 37:1433–1437
Galante J, Rostoker W, Ray R (1970) Physical properties of trabecular bone. Calc Tiss Res 5:236–246
Lotz J, Gerhart T, Hayes W (1990) Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. J Comp Assist Tomogr 14:107–114
Hodgskinson R, Currey J (1992) Young’s modulus, density and material properties in cancellous bone over a large density range. J Mat Sci Mat Med 3:377–381
Kalender W et al (1995) The European spine phantom—a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. Eur J Radiol 20:83–92
Rho J, Hobatho M, Ashman R (1995) Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys 17:347–355
Wirtz D et al (2000) Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. J Biomech 33:1325–1330
Adams J (2009) Quantitative computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 71:415–424
Carter D, Hayes W (1976) Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. Science 194:1174–1175
Taylor W et al (2002) Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis. J Biomech 35:767–773
Pancanti A, Bernakiewicz M, Viceconti M (2003) The primary stability of a cementless stem varies between subjects as much as between activities. J Biomech 36:777–785
Taddei F, Pancanti A, Viceconti M (2004) An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. Med Eng Phys 26:61–69
Morgan E, Bayraktar H, Keaveny T (2003) Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 36:897–904
Marangalou J et al (2013) A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy using a database approach. J Biomech 46:2356–2362
Rietbergen B, Ito K (2015) A survey of micro-finite element analysis for clinical assessment of bone strength: the first decade. J Biomech 48:832–841
Scholz R et al (2013) Validation of density-elasticity relationships for finite element modelling of human pelvic bone by modal analysis. J Biomech 46:2667–2673
Liu S et al (2010) High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography can assess microstructural and mechanical properties of human distal tibial bone. J Bone Min Res 25(4):746–756
Carnelli D et al (2010) A finite element model for direction-dependent mechanical response to nanoindentation of cortical bone allowing for anisotropic post-yield behaviour of the tissue. J Biomech Eng 132:081008.1–081008.10
Carnelli D et al (2011) Nanoindentation testing and finite element simulations of cortical bone allowing for anisotropic elastic and inelastic mechanical response. J Biomech 44:1852–1858
Koivumaki J et al (2012) Cortical bone finite element models in the estimation of experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur. Bone 51:737–740
Nelly N et al (2013) An investigation of the inelastic behaviour of trabecular bone during the press-fit implantation of a tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Med Eng Phys 35:1599–1606
Viceconti M, Olsen S, Burton K (2005) Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations. Clin Biomech 20:451–454
Neugebauer R et al (2011) Experimental modal analysis on fresh-frozen human hemipelvic bones employing a 3D laser vibrometer for the purpose of modal parameter identification. J Biomech 44:1610–1613
Cristofolini L, Viceconti M, Cappello A, Toni A (1996) Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J Biomech 29(4):525–535
Completo A, Fonseca F, Simões J (2007) Experimental validation of intact and implanted distal femur finite element models. J Biomech 40:2467–2476
Castro A, Completo A, Simões J, Flores P (2015) Biomechanical behaviour of cancellous bone on patellofemoral arthroplasty with Journey prosthesis: a finite element study. Comp Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 18(10):1090–1098
Meireles S, Completo A, Simões J, Flores P (2010) Strain shielding in distal femur after patellofemoral arthroplasty under different activity conditions. J Biomech 43:477–484
Abdul-Kadir M et al (2008) Finite element modelling of primary hip stem stability: the effect of interference fit. J Biomech 41:587–594
Chong D, Hansen U, Andrew A (2010) Analysis of bone-prosthesis interface micromotion for cementless tibial prosthesis fixation and the influence of loading conditions. J Biomech 43:1074–1080
Viceconti M, Davinelli M, Taddei F, Cappello A (2004) Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies. J Biomech 37:1597–1605
Weiss J et al (2005) Three-dimensional finite element modeling of ligaments: technical aspects. Med Eng Phys 27:845–861
Laville A, Laporte S, Skalli W (2009) Parametric and subject-specific finite element modelling of the lower cervical spine. Influence of geometrical parameters on the motion patterns. J Biomech 42:1409–1415
Rothstock S et al (2010) Primary stability of uncemented femoral resurfacing implants for varying interface parameters and material formulations during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech 43:521–526
Taylor M, Bryan R, Galloway F (2013) Accounting for patient variability in finite element analysis of the intact and implanted hip and knee: a review. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 29(2):273–292
Pankaj P (2013) Patient-specific modelling of bone and bone-implant systems: the challenges. J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 29(2):233–249
Arregui-Mena J, Margetts L, Mummery P (2014) Practical application of the stochastic finite element method. Comp Meth Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-014-9139-3
Amirouche F et al (2014) Factors influencing initial cup stability in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 29:1177–1185
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028424, funded by Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (COMPETE 2020) on its component FEDER and by funding from FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia on its component OE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Almeida, F.M.P., Completo, A.M.G. (2020). Finite Element Analysis of Bone and Experimental Validation. In: Belinha, J., Manzanares-Céspedes, MC., Completo, A. (eds) The Computational Mechanics of Bone Tissue. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37541-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37541-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37540-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37541-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)