Skip to main content

Quantifying the Effect of Autonomous Demand Response Program on Self-Scheduling of Multi-carrier Residential Energy Hub

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Electricity Markets

Abstract

In this chapter, an overall model is proposed for energy management in the form of energy hub for residential sectors to reduce the operating costs and air pollution by utilization of different technologies such as renewables and demand response (DR) resources. In so doing, a residential building has been considered as an energy hub that receives natural gas and electricity at its inputs and delivers electricity and heat to consumers at its output. Also, the consumers include controllable and uncontrollable loads that controllable loads are controlled by the DR program. The main goal of this chapter is to lower the costs of operation and air pollution of the energy hub. The results show that when the price of natural gas is low, the energy hub uses natural gas to supply electric and thermal demands, and when the price of electricity is low, it uses electricity to feed consumers’ demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

c:

Index of controllable loads

ce:

Index of carbon emission

ch:

Index of charging

dch:

Index of discharging

e:

Index of power

es:

Index of energy storage

g:

Index of natural gas

GB:

Index of gas boiler

h:

Index of heat

l:

Index of load

Net:

Index of network

t :

Index of time (h)

uc:

Index of uncontrollable loads

α t :

Natural gas distribution coefficient between CHP and Boiler

η CHP, e :

Efficiency of CHP power generation

η CHP, h :

Efficiency of CHP heat generation

η e, L :

Efficiency of electric loads

η es, ch :

Energy storage charge efficiency

η es, dch :

Energy storage discharge efficiency

η GB :

Efficiency of heat generation by boiler

η h, L :

Efficiency of thermal loads

μ :

Mean value of sunlight

π ce :

Price of carbon emission (cent/kW)

\( {\pi}_{\mathrm{e}}^t \) :

Price of purchasing power (cent/kW)

\( {\pi}_{\mathrm{g}}^t \) :

Price of purchasing natural gas (cent/kW)

σ :

Standard deviation

\( {C}_{\mathrm{CHP}}^{\mathrm{max}} \) :

Maximum natural gas imported into CHP (kW)

DSMt :

Participation of load in the proposed DSM at t

E c, e :

Energy consumed by controllable electric loads in 24 h (kWh)

E c, h :

Energy consumed by controllable thermal loads in 24 h (kWh)

\( {E}_{\mathrm{es}}^0 \) :

Initial value of energy storage SOC (kWh)

\( {E}_{\mathrm{es}}^{\mathrm{max}} \) :

Upper bound of energy storage SOC (kWh)

\( {E}_{\mathrm{es}}^{\mathrm{min}} \) :

Lower bound of energy storage SOC (kWh)

FF:

Fill factor

\( {H}_{\mathrm{max}}^t \) :

Upper bound of controllable thermal loads at t (kW)

\( {H}_{\mathrm{min}}^t \) :

Lower bound of controllable thermal loads at t (kW)

\( {H}_{\mathrm{uc}}^t \) :

Uncontrollable thermal loads at t (kW)

I Mpp :

Current at maximum power point (A)

I sc :

Short circuit current (A)

K i :

Current temperature coefficient (A °C)

K MPPT :

Maximum power temperature coefficient

K v :

Voltage temperature coefficient (V °C)

lDSMt :

Load curtailed by DSM program at period t

Loadt :

Load after DSM running at t (kW)

\( {\mathrm{Load}}_0^t \) :

Load before DSM running at t (kW)

N OT :

Nominal operating temperature of cell (°C)

\( {P}_{\mathrm{es},\mathrm{ch}}^{\mathrm{max}} \) :

Upper bound of energy storage charging (kW)

\( {P}_{\mathrm{es},\mathrm{dch}}^{\mathrm{max}} \) :

Upper bound of energy storage discharging (kW)

\( {P}_{\mathrm{max}}^t \) :

Upper bound of controllable electric loads at t (kW)

\( {P}_{\mathrm{min}}^t \) :

Lower bound of controllable electric loads at t (kW)

P PV :

Output power of solar panel (kW)

P STC :

Output power of solar panel at standard test conditions (kW)

P sy :

Output power of the PV module during state y (kW)

\( {P}_{\mathrm{uc}}^t \) :

Uncontrollable electric loads at t (kW)

s :

Solar radiation

s ay :

Average solar irradiance of state y

S STC :

Solar irradiance at standard test conditions

T A :

Temperature of ambient (°C)

T cy :

Cell temperature over state y (°C)

V MPP :

Voltage at maximum power point (V)

V oc :

Open-circuit voltage (V)

\( {E}_{\mathrm{es}}^{24} \) :

SOC of battery at hour 24 (kWh)

\( {E}_{\mathrm{es}}^t \) :

SOC of battery at t (kWh)

\( {G}_{\mathrm{Net}}^t \) :

Imported natural gas at t (kW)

\( {H}_{\mathrm{c}}^t \) :

Controllable thermal loads at t (kW)

\( {H}_{\mathrm{CHP}}^t \) :

Heat generated by CHP at t (kW)

\( {H}_{\mathrm{GB}}^t \) :

Heat generated by boiler at t (kW)

\( {H}_{\mathrm{hs},\mathrm{ch}}^t \) :

Charged heat of heat storage at t (kW)

\( {H}_{\mathrm{hs},\mathrm{dch}}^t \) :

Discharged heat of heat storage at t (kW)

\( {H}_{\mathrm{L}}^t \) :

Total thermal loads at t (kW)

\( {l}_{\mathrm{es},\mathrm{ch}}^t/{l}_{\mathrm{es},\mathrm{dch}}^t \) :

Binary values preventing battery from charging/discharging simultaneously

\( {P}_{\mathrm{c}}^t \) :

Controllable electric loads at t (kW)

\( {P}_{\mathrm{CHP}}^t \) :

Power generated by CHP at t (kW)

\( {P}_{\mathrm{es},\mathrm{ch}}^t \) :

Charged power of energy storage at t (kW)

\( {P}_{\mathrm{es},\mathrm{dch}}^t \) :

Discharged power of energy storage at t (kW)

\( {P}_{\mathrm{L}}^t \) :

Total electric loads at t (kW)

\( {P}_{\mathrm{Net}}^t \) :

Power imported from grid at t (kW)

C :

Total objective function (cent)

C ce :

Cost of carbon emission (cent)

C e :

Cost of purchasing power (cent)

C g :

Cost of purchasing natural gas (cent)

References

  1. M. Shamshirband et al., Look-ahead risk-averse power scheduling of heterogeneous electric vehicles aggregations enabling V2G and G2V systems based on information gap decision theory. Electr. Pow. Syst. Res. 173, 56–70 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Salehi et al., Scenario-based co-optimization of neighboring multi carrier smart buildings under demand response exchange. J. Clean. Prod. 235, 1483–1498 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Nojavan, M. Majidi, K. Zare, Optimal scheduling of heating and power hubs under economic and environment issues in the presence of peak load management. Energ. Conver. Manage. 156, 34–44 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F.S. Gazijahani, J. Salehi, Reliability constrained two-stage optimization of multiple renewable-based microgrids incorporating critical energy peak pricing demand response program using robust optimization approach. Energy 161, 999–1015 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Vahid-Pakdel et al., Stochastic optimization of energy hub operation with consideration of thermal energy market and demand response. Energ. Conver. Manage. 145, 117–128 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F.S. Gazijahani, J. Salehi, Game theory based profit maximization model for microgrid aggregators with presence of EDRP using information gap decision theory. IEEE Syst. J. 13(2), 1767–1775 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Majidi, S. Nojavan, K. Zare, A cost-emission framework for hub energy system under demand response program. Energy 134, 157–166 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Maroufmashat, A. Elkamel, M. Fowler, S. Sattari, R. Roshandel, A. Hajimiragha, et al., Modeling and optimization of a network of energy hubs to improve economic and emission considerations. Energy 93, 2546–2558 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Moghaddam, M. Saniei, E. Mashhour, A comprehensive model for self-scheduling an energy hub to supply cooling, heating and electrical demands of a building. Energy 94, 157–170 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Sheikhi, S. Bahrami, A.M. Ranjbar, An autonomous demand response program for electricity and natural gas networks in smart energy hubs. Energy 89, 490–499 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Abdolahi et al., Probabilistic multi-objective arbitrage of dispersed energy storage systems for optimal congestion management of active distribution networks including solar/wind/CHP hybrid energy system. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 10(4), 045502 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Fabrizio, V. Corrado, M. Filippi, A model to design and optimize multi-energy systems in buildings at the design concept stage. Renew. Energy 35, 644–655 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Najafi-Ghalelou et al., Robust scheduling of thermal, cooling and electrical hub energy system under market price uncertainty. Appl. Therm. Eng. 149, 862–880 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M.-W. Tian et al., Risk-based stochastic scheduling of energy hub system in the presence of heating network and thermal energy management. Appl. Therm. Eng. 159, 113825 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M.-R. Haghifam, S. Pazouki, S. Pazouki, Renewables and plug in electric vehicles modeling on electricity and gas infrastructures scheduling in presence of responsive demand, in 2013 3rd International Conference on Electric Power and Energy Conversion Systems (EPECS), 2013, pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Rastegar, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. Lehtonen, Home load management in a residential energy hub. Electr. Pow. Syst. Res. 119, 322–328 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. F.S. Gazijahani, J. Salehi, IGDT based complementarity approach for dealing with strategic decision making of price maker VPP considering demand flexibility. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 16, 1–9 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Pazouki, M.-R. Haghifam, A. Moser, Uncertainty modeling in optimal operation of energy hub in presence of wind, storage and demand response. Int. J. Electri. Power Energy Syst. 61, 335–345 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Shamshirband et al., Decentralized trading of plug-in electric vehicle aggregation agents for optimal energy management of smart renewable penetrated microgrids with the aim of CO2 emission reduction. J. Clean. Prod. 200, 622–640 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Smith, P. Few, J. Twidell, Technical and operational performance of a small-scale comined heat-and-power (CHP) plant. Energy 20, 1205–1214 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M.C. Bozchalui, S.A. Hashmi, H. Hassen, C.A. Cañizares, K. Bhattacharya, Optimal operation of residential energy hubs in smart grids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 3, 1755–1766 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Najafi-Ghalelou, S. Nojavan, K. Zare, Heating and power hub models for robust performance of smart building using information gap decision theory. Int. J. Electr. Pow. Energy Syst. 98, 23–35 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. F.S. Gazijahani, S.N. Ravadanegh, J. Salehi, Stochastic multi-objective model for optimal energy exchange optimization of networked microgrids with presence of renewable generation under risk-based strategies. ISA Trans. 73, 100–111 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. F.S. Gazijahani, J. Salehi, Integrated DR and reconfiguration scheduling for optimal operation of microgrids using Hong’s point estimate method. Int. J. Electr. Pow. Energy Syst. 99, 481–492 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. F.S. Gazijahani, J. Salehi, Robust design of microgrids with reconfigurable topology under severe uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 9(2), 559–569 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Rajasekharan, V. Koivunen, Optimal energy consumption model for smart grid households with energy storage. IEEE J. Select. Top. Signal Process. 8, 1154–1166 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. P. Salyani et al., Chance constrained simultaneous optimization of substations, feeders, renewable and non-renewable distributed generations in distribution network. Electr. Pow. Syst. Res. 158, 56–69 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Bahramara, H. Golpîra, Robust optimization of micro-grids operation problem in the presence of electric vehicles. Sustain. Cities Soc. 37, 388–395 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. F.S. Gazijahani, J. Salehi, Optimal bi-level model for stochastic risk-based planning of microgrids under uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 14(7), 3054–3064 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. L. Gelazanskas, K.A. Gamage, Demand side management in smart grid: a review and proposals for future direction. Sustain. Cities Soc. 11, 22–30 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. F.S. Gazijahani, J. Salehi, Stochastic multi-objective framework for optimal dynamic planning of interconnected microgrids. IET Renew. Power Gener. 11(14), 1749–1759 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farhad Samadi Gazijahani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Namvar, A., Gazijahani, F.S., Salehi, J. (2020). Quantifying the Effect of Autonomous Demand Response Program on Self-Scheduling of Multi-carrier Residential Energy Hub. In: Nojavan, S., Zare, K. (eds) Electricity Markets. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36979-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36979-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36978-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36979-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics