Skip to main content

Motor Learning and Machine Learning: Predicting the Amount of Sessions to Learn the Tracing Task

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Neuroscience (LAWCN 2019)

Abstract

Motor activities are the main way of interacting with the world. Therefore, loss of ability to perform some of these activities, e.g. as a result of a neurological disease, is a serious injury to the individual. The present work aims to propose an approach to estimate the number of sessions required to learn a motor task. In the literature, there are many works on motor learning, mostly looking for ways to decrease the time of skill acquisition or motor rehabilitation. However, few works concentrate on trying to estimate the training time needed to achieve certain motor performance. In the experiment, three sessions - one session per day - were performed for each participant, whose purpose was to predict in which tracing task session the participant would reach a certain error based on their profile and initial performance. The classification models were: Algorithm K-Neighbors Nearer (KNN), Neural Network Multi Layer Perceptron (MLP), Decision Tree (AD) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). They were compared using three metrics, namely: Accuracy, F1-Score and Cohen Kappa coefficient. MLP, SVM and AD, had similar results for Accuracy and Cohen Kappa coefficient, but better than KNN, whereas for the F1-Score MPL performed better than all. This work showed the possibility of estimating the number of sessions to achieve a certain performance using prediction algorithms. This finding suggests that a similar approach may be used to estimate the amount of training a patient requires to rehabilitate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://invokeit.wordpress.com/frequency-word-lists/.

  2. 2.

    www.theleagueofmoveabletype.com.

References

  1. Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., Erbaugh, J.: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 4(6), 561–571 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carvalho, M.B.F.: Evaluate plataform of automatic motor learning skill, monograph (Computer Engineering), UFMA (Federal Uniersvity of Maranhão), São Luís, Brazil (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Espírito-Santo, H., Pires, C.F., Garcia, I.Q., Daniel, F., Silva, A.G., Fazio, R.L.: Preliminary validation of the portuguese edinburgh handedness inventory in an adult sample. Appl. Neuropsychol. Adult 24(3), 275–287 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hahne, J.M., et al.: Linear and nonlinear regression techniques for simultaneous and proportional myoelectric control. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22(2), 269–279 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jordan, M.I., Mitchell, T.M.: Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349(6245), 255–260 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Kitago, T., Krakauer, J.W.: Motor learning principles for neurorehabilitation. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 110, 93–103 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lemm, S., Blankertz, B., Dickhaus, T., Müller, K.R.: Introduction to machine learning for brain imaging. Neuroimage 56(2), 387–399 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Norvig, P., Russell, S.: Inteligência Artificial, vol. 1, 3 edn. Elsevier, Brasil (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Prichard, G., Weiller, C., Fritsch, B., Reis, J.: Effects of different electrical brain stimulation protocols on subcomponents of motor skill learning. Brain Stimulation 7(4), 532–540 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reis, J., et al.: Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106(5), 1590–1595 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rossum, G.: Python reference manual. Technical report, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Santos, M.R., et al.: Machine learning to estimate the amount of training to learn a motor skill. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11581, pp. 198–209. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22216-1_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Sato, A., Fujita, T., Ohashi, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Suzuki, K., Otsuki, K.: A prediction model for activities of daily living for stroke patients in a convalescent rehabilitation ward. J. Allied Health Sci. 7(1), 1–6 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shinners, P.: Pygame. http://pygame.org/ (2011)

  16. Sonoda, S., Saitoh, E., Nagai, S., Okuyama, Y., Suzuki, T., Suzuki, M.: Stroke outcome prediction using reciprocal number of initial activities of daily living status. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 14(1), 8–11 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsuji, T., Liu, M., Sonoda, S., Domen, K., Chino, N.: The stroke impairment assessment set: its internal consistency and predictive validity. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 81(7), 863–868 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge FAPEMA for the financial support for this research specially for scholarship, Proc. UNIVERSAL-01294/16 and Proc. 2019/10012-2, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Rogério de Almeida Ribeiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de Souza, E.D.F., dos Santos, M.R., da Silva, L.C.C., de Oliveira, A.C.M., Neto, A.d.A., Ribeiro, P.R.d.A. (2019). Motor Learning and Machine Learning: Predicting the Amount of Sessions to Learn the Tracing Task. In: Cota, V., Barone, D., Dias, D., Damázio, L. (eds) Computational Neuroscience. LAWCN 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1068. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36636-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36636-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36635-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36636-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics