Skip to main content

Effect of Scanning Strategy on Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover TMS 2020 149th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of different scanning strategies on the hardness of the parts, fabricated by direct metal laser melting . In this work, pre-alloyed powder of titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) is used to produce dense parts with three different scanning strategies: unidirectional, alternate, and cross-hatching. A numerical scheme is developed to predict the heat transfer , fluid flow, and thermal history -based phase transformation during the process. Surface hardness is calculated from the obtained phase fractions. Hardness is measured experimentally, and X-ray diffraction is used for phase identification. The hardness is found to be highly dependent on the microstructure of as-built parts. The results show that rapid solidification during direct metal laser melting leads to the formation of hcp-structured acicular martensite from the parent beta phase, which increases the hardness . Higher part densities are observed for cross-hatching strategy compared to other scanning strategies. The predicted maximum hardness for different scanning strategies compare well against the experimental observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kumar S (2003) Selective laser sintering: a qualitative and objective approach. JOM 55(10):43–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Khaing MW, Fuh JYH, Lu L (2001) Direct metal laser sintering for rapid tooling: processing and characterization of EOS parts. J Mater Process Technol 113:269–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. King D, Tansey T (2002) Alternative materials for rapid tooling. J Mater Process Technol 121:313–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2010) Additive manufacturing technologies—rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dahotre NB, Harimkar SP (2008) Laser fabrication and machining of materials. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mellor S, Hao L, Zhang D (2014) Additive manufacturing: a framework for implementation. Int J Prod Econ 149:194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruffo M, Hague RJM (2007) Cost estimation for rapid manufacturing—simultaneous production of mixed components using laser sintering. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf 221(11):1585–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Atkinson D (1997) Rapid prototyping and tooling, a practical guide. Strategy Publication Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, UK

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hänninen J (2001) DMLS moves from rapid tooling to rapid manufacturing. Met Powder Rep 56(9):24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Steen WM, Mazumder J (2010) Laser material processing, 4th edn. Springer-Verlag London Limited, London, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Hopkinson N, Hague R, Dickens P (2006) Rapid manufacturing: an industrial revolution for the digital age. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  12. Farshidianfar MH, Khajepour A, Gerlich AP (2016) Effect of real-time cooling rate on microstructure in laser additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 231:468–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bidare P et al (2018) Fluid and particle dynamics in laser powder bed fusion. Acta Mater 142:107–120

    Google Scholar 

  14. Qiu C et al (2015) On the role of melt flow into the surface structure and porosity development during selective laser melting. Acta Mater 96:72–79

    Google Scholar 

  15. Murr LE et al (2009) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti–6Al–4V produced by rapid-layer manufacturing, for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2(1):20–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thijs L et al (2010) A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V. Acta Mater 58.9:3303–3312

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chlebus E et al (2011) Microstructure and mechanical behaviour of Ti–6Al–7Nb alloy produced by selective laser melting. Mater Charact 62.5:488–495

    Google Scholar 

  18. Voller VR, Swaminathan CR (1991) ERAL Source-based method for solidification phase change. Numer Heat Transfer, Part B Fundam 19.2:175–189

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mills KC (2002) Recommended values of thermophysical properties for selected commercial alloys. Woodhead Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  20. Welsch G, Boyer R, Collings EW (eds) (1993) Materials properties handbook: titanium alloys. ASM international

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lips T, Fritsche B (2005) A comparison of commonly used re-entry analysis tools. Acta Astronaut 57(2-8):312–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kelly SM (2004) Thermal and microstructure modeling of metal deposition processes with application to Ti–6Al–4V. Ph.D. thesis. https://theses.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11242004-211009/

  23. Charles C, Järvstråt N (2009) Modelling Ti–6Al–4V microstructure by evolution laws implemented as finite element subroutines: application to TIG metal deposition. In: David SA et al (eds) Proceedings of the 8th international conference on trends in welding research (TWR), Pine Mountain, Georgia (USA), pp 477–485

    Google Scholar 

  24. Murgau CC, Pederson R, Lindgren LE (2012) A model for Ti–6Al–4V microstructure evolution for arbitrary temperature changes. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 20(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/20/5/055006

  25. Irwin J, Reutzel ET, Michaleris P, Keist J, Nassar AR (2016) Predicting microstructure from thermal history during additive manufacturing for Ti–6Al–4V. J Manufact Sci Eng 138. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033525

  26. Hahn JD, Shin YC, Krane MJM (2007) Laser transformation hardening of Ti–6Al–4V in solid state with accompanying kinetic model. Surf Eng 23(2):78–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hollander DA, von Walter M, Wirtz T, Sellei R, Schmidt-Rohlfing B, Paar O et al (2006) Biomater 27(7):955–963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rombouts M (2006) PhD thesis. KU Leuven

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dinda GP, Dasgupta AK, Mazumder J (2009) Laser aided direct metal deposition of Inconel 625 superalloy: microstructural evolution and thermal stability. Mater Sci Eng, A 509(1-2):98–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amber Shrivastava .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ghate, N.D., Gaur, B., Shrivastava, A. (2020). Effect of Scanning Strategy on Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V. In: TMS 2020 149th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36296-6_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics