Skip to main content

Exploring the Causal Modeling of Human-Robot Touch Interaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2401 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11876))

Abstract

The growing emergence of socially assistive robots in our daily lives inevitably entails such interactions as touch and hug between robots and humans. Therefore, derivation of robust models for such physical interactions to enable robots to perform them in naturalistic fashion is highly desirable. In this study, we investigated whether it was possible to realize distinct patterns of different touch interactions that were general representations of their respective types. For this purpose, we adapted three touch interaction paradigms and asked human subjects to perform them on a mannequin that was equipped with a touch sensor on its torso. We then applied Wiener-Granger causality on the time series of activated channels of this touch sensor that were common (per touch paradigm) among all participants. The analyses of these touch time series suggested that different types of touch can be quantified in terms of causal association between sequential steps that form the variation information among their patterns. These results hinted at the potential utility of such generalized touch patterns for devising social robots with robust causal models of naturalistic touch behaviour for their human-robot touch interactions.

M. Shiomi—This research work was supported by JST CREST Grant Number JPMJCR18A1, Japan, and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP19K20746 and JP17K00293.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gallace, A., Spence, C.: The science of interpersonal touch: an overview. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 246–259 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Field, T.: Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: a review. Dev. Rev. 30, 367–383 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Matarić, M.J.: Socially assistive robotics: Human augmentation versus automation. Sci. Robot. 2, eaam5410 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mann, J.A., MacDonald, B.A., Kuo, I., Li, X., Broadbent, E.: People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 112–117 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Broadbent, E.: Interactions with robots: the truths we reveal about ourselves. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 68, 627–652 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakagawa, K., Shiomi, M., Shinozawa, K., Matsumura, R., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Does a robot’s touch encourage human effort? Int. J. Soc. Robot. 9, 5–15 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schaal, S.: Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots? Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 233–242 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Granger, C.W.J.: Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37, 424–438 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geweke, J.: Measures of conditional linear dependence and feedback between time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 79, 907–915 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Pereda, E., Quiroga, R.W., Bhattacharya, J.: Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals. Prog. Neurobiol. 77, 1–37 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamilton, J.D.: Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press, Printceton (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C., Schmidt, P., Shin, Y.: Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J. Econ. 54, 159–178 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barnett, L., Seth, A.K.: The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: a new approach to Granger-causal inference. J. Neurosci. Methods 223, 50–68 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Elsevier, San Fransisco (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soheil Keshmiri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Keshmiri, S., Sumioka, H., Minato, T., Shiomi, M., Ishiguro, H. (2019). Exploring the Causal Modeling of Human-Robot Touch Interaction. In: Salichs, M., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35887-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35888-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics