Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

UAVs and Urban Spatial Analysis pp 71–87Cite as

Small Unmanned Aerial Systems and Privacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

A significant advantage of sUAS technology is its ability to collect high-resolution data at a large scale, including individual streets, yards, and houses. Recent advances in sUAS technology, including decreasing size, increased functionality, and improved affordability, mean that both researchers and practitioners can collect these data quickly and without a major coordination of people and resources. Given the relative ease of such efforts and the resolution of data that can be acquired, there are increasing concerns that both recreational and professional operators can collect information from locations that might be considered private. For some bystanders, private space may be defined by porches and decks with privacy screens. For others, a backyard fence or wall may represent private space. Whatever the definition, privacy is central to the debate on the fair and equitable use of sUAS technology in urban areas. Moreover, it is one of the major factors in local decisions to regulate where and how sUAS are used. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the concept of privacy in relation to sUAS technology and detail the pragmatic implications of privacy-related restrictions for drone operation. This chapter concludes with a brief overview of sUAS ethics and the increased need for local awareness and cultural sensitivity when operating sUAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I. (1976). Privacy: A conceptual analysis. Environment and Behavior, 8(1), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I. (1977). Privacy regulation: Culturally universal or culturally specific? Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 66–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amar, A. R. (1994). Fourth amendment first principles. Harvard Law Review, 107(4), 757–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AUVSI. (2018). 2018 state legislative map. Arlington: The Association for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles International. Retrieved July 6, 2018, from http://cqrcengage.com/auvsi/statelegmap

  • Bennett, C. J. (1992). Regulating privacy: Data protection and public policy in Europe and the United States. Ithica: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, T., & Gelsthorpe, L. (1996). Public attitudes towards CCTV in public places. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 5(1), 72–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulos, M., & Sarno, C. (1996). Codes of practice and public closed circuit television systems. London: Local Government Information Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, S., & Popham, N. (2019). North Little Rock police frequently use drones. What are they watching? KATV abc 7. Retrieved April 1, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/y4dft8r5

  • Cavoukian, A. (2012). Privacy and drones: Unmanned aerial vehicles. Ontario: Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, V., Chundury, P., & Chetty, M. (2017). Spiders in the sky: User perceptions of drones, privacy, and security. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 6765–6776). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Divis, D. A. (2015). FAA opens door to long-range drone flights, amazon prime air R&D. Inside Umanned Systems. Retrieved May 12, 2016, from https://tinyurl.com/k8qs8df

  • Dormehl, L. (2018). 7 amazing anti-drone technologies designed to swat UAVs out of the sky. Digitial Trends. Retrieved January 28, 2018, from https://tinyurl.com/y2g7lhu8

  • Engberts, B., & Gillissen, E. (2016). Policing from above: Drone use by the police. In B. Custers (Ed.), The future of drone use: Opportunities and threats from ethical and legal perspectives (pp. 93–113). The Hague: TMC Asser Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • FAA. (2018). FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018. H.R.302. 115th Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, H. B. (2014). Eyes in the sky: Constitutional and regulatory approaches to domestic drone deployment. Syracuse Law Review, 64(1), 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farivar, C. (2016). Woman shoots drone: “It hovered for a second and I blasted it to smithereens.” Arstechnica. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/jyh7hpl

  • Fay, S. J. (1998). Tough on crime, tough on civil liberties: Some negative aspects of Britain’s wholesale adoption of CCTV surveillance during the 1990s. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 12(2), 315–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, R. L., & Wright, D. (2016). Privacy, data protection and ethics for civil drone practice: A survey of industry, regulators and civil society organisations. Computer Law & Security Review, 32(4), 577–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, N. R., & Bannister, J. (1996). City watching: Closed circuit television surveillance in public spaces. The Royal Geographical Society, 28(1), 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granville, K. (2018). Facebook and Cambridge analytica: What you need to know as fallout widens. New York City: New York Times. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/yamwa445

  • Greenwald, G. (2013, June). Edward Snowden: The whistleblower behind the NSA surveillance revelations. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/hhvjmzn

  • Gruber, R. H. (2015). Commercial drones and privacy: Can we trust states with ‘drone federalism’? Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 21(4), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • HB. (2016). An ordinance of the city of Hermosa Beach 16-0174 adding a new chapter 9.38 to the Hermosa Beach municipal code to regulate unmanned aircraft, drones. Hermosa Beach. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/y35l4hb8

  • Herron, K. G., Jenkins Smith, H. C., & Silva, C. L. (2014). US public perspectives on privacy, security, and unmanned aircraft systems. Norman: University of Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, P. (2017, December 19). 8% of Americans say they own a drone, while more than half have seen one in operation. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holligan, A. (2016). Dutch police fight drones with eagles. BBC News. Retrieved April, 1, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/y59qjszs

  • HR. (2012). Preserving Freedom from Unwarranted Surveillance Act of 2012. S.3287. 112th Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. G. (2007). Computer ethics. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Slovic, P., Gastil, J., & Cohen, G. (2008). Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, D. V. S. (2007). Privacy as a social good. Social Thought & Research, 28, 165–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, K., & Soylu, A. (2013). Technology: The good, the bad, and the ugly. How technology is affecting employee privacy, work life balance, and workplace relationships. Mustang Journal of Management and Marketing, 2, 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, J. D., & Miethe, T. D. (2018). The thin blue line meets the big blue sky: Perceptions of police legitimacy and public attitudes towards aerial drones. Criminal Justice Studies, 31(1), 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luppicini, R., & So, A. (2016). A technoethical review of commercial drone use in the context of governance, ethics, and privacy. Technology in Society, 46, 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. (2016). “What a long strange trip it’s been”: A journey through the FAA’s drone policies and regulations. DePaul Law Review, 65(1), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matiteyahu, T. (2014). Drone regulations and fourth amendment rights: The interaction of state drone statutes and the reasonable expectation of privacy. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 48, 265.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, C. (2015). N.J. man faces prison for shooting down drone, cops say. NJ. Retrieved March, 26, 2018, from https://tinyurl.com/y6y9a46y

  • Mogg, T. (2016). Amazon’s delivery drone team will like the sound of this significant FAA decision. Digitial Trends. Retrieved August 15, 2019, from http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/amazon-faa-drone-rules/

  • Nelson, J., Grubesic, T., Wallace, D., & Chamberlain, A. (2019). The view from above: A survey on the public’s perception of unmanned aerial vehicles and privacy. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(1), 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum, H. (1998). Protecting privacy in an information age: The problem of privacy in public. Law and Philosophy, 17(5), 559–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • NJ. (2018). An act concerning police surveillance and supplementing title 2A of the New Jersey statutes (p. 1). New Jersey: State Legislature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C., & Armstrong, G. (1997). The unforgiving eye: CCTV surveillance in public space. Hull: University of Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, G. J., & Phelps, J. E. (1992). Understanding privacy concerns: An assessment of consumers’ information-related knowledge and beliefs. Journal of Direct Marketing, 6(4), 28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NY. (2019). Imposes limitations on the use of drones within the state. A00280. 2019-2020 NY General Assembly.

    Google Scholar 

  • OC. (2016). Drones: Know before you fly. Santa Ana. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/y2n9cpux

  • Ong, T. (2017). Dutch police will stop using drone-hunting eagles since they weren’t doing what they’re told. The Verge. Retrieved March 15, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/yabr2qtu

  • Price, D. (2018). 4 reasons why facebook is a security and privacy nightmare. Retrieved April 5, 2019, from https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/facebook-security-privacy-nightmare/

  • Rachels, J. (1975). Why privacy is important. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 4(4), 323–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, B., Gopi, A. G., & Maione, R. (2016). The societal impact of commercial drones. Technology in Society, 45, 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenberg, J. R. (1991). Privacy in the information economy: A fortress or frontier for individual rights. Federal Communications Law Journal, 44, 195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, W. H., & Madensen, T. D. (2016). Citizen acceptance of police interventions: An example of CCTV surveillance in Las Vegas, Nevada. Criminal Justice Studies, 29(1), 40–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J., & Crump, C. (2011). Protecting privacy from aerial surveillance: Recommendations for government use of drone aircraft. New York: ACLU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, A., Gong, W., Shea, R., Liu, J., Liu, X. S., & Wang, Q. (2017). Drone privacy shield: A WiFi based defense. In 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talak, C. (2019). Police, SWAT standoff ends in Castle Rock. The Daily News. Retrieved April 1, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/seflqew

    Google Scholar 

  • Timberg, C., Dwoskin, E., & Fung, B. (2017). Data of 143 million Americans exposed in hack of credit reporting agency Equifax. Washington, D.C.: Washington Post. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/y6yd3vjs

  • Tracy, T. (2019). NYPD uses drone to keep tabs on barricaded man during standoff. Police One. Retrieved April 1, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/y5atmn39

  • Traub, A. M. (2000). The wall is down, now we build more: The exclusionary effects of gated communities demand stricter burdens under the FHA comment. John Marshall Law Review, 34(1), 379–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volovelsky, U. (2014). Civilian uses of unmanned aerial vehicles and the threat to the right to privacy–an Israeli case study. Computer Law & Security Review, 30(3), 306–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Xia, H., Yao, Y., & Huang, Y. (2016). Flying eyes and hidden controllers: A qualitative study of people’s privacy perceptions of civilian drones in the US. In Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (pp. 172–190).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, J. P., & Bowman, J. S. (2016). The domestic use of drones: An ethical analysis of surveillance issues. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 649–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westin, A. F. (1966). Science, privacy, and freedom: Issues and proposals for the 1970’s. Part I--the current impact of surveillance on privacy. Columbia Law Review, 66(6), 1003–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westin, A. F. (1968). Privacy and freedom. Washington and Lee Law Review, 25(1), 166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Y., Xia, H., Huang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2017). Privacy mechanisms for drones: Perceptions of drone controllers and bystanders. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 6777–6788). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geoinformatics and Policy Analytics Lab (GPAL), School of Information, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Tony H. Grubesic & Jake R. Nelson

Authors
  1. Tony H. Grubesic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jake R. Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grubesic, T.H., Nelson, J.R. (2020). Small Unmanned Aerial Systems and Privacy. In: UAVs and Urban Spatial Analysis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35865-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation