Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Mistakes, Errors and Failures across Cultures pp 147–162Cite as

Qualities of Communication Failures in Hierarchical Relationships: A Theoretical Model for Conflict Prevention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1186 Accesses

Abstract

Many social relationships people engage in are hierarchically structured, such as boss–employee, doctor/therapist–patient or teacher–pupil. Reasons to assign a leading role to one party in an interpersonal relationship can include advanced knowledge or expertise, seniority, agreement and ownership or control of resources. Differences in hierarchical status lead to particular expectations of and specific responsibilities assigned to the involved parties. The expectations include qualities of interaction, responsibilities, the other’s value system and, consequently, the other’s behaviour as well as assumptions concerning the other party’s expectations (i.e. expectations of second and third order). During communication the different agents often assume divergent appraisals and expectations as obvious and do not share these presuppositions explicitly. In addition, cognitive biases can be expected to systematically influence the social behaviour of all parties involved without the interacting people being fully aware of them. As a consequence, communication failures and different qualities of conflict can be expected to (re)occur frequently in hierarchical social relationships. In this chapter a model of communication failures in hierarchical relationships within Western cultures is proposed. This model can be useful for teaching purposes to prevent conflict in, for instance, medical or educational contexts. In addition, the proposed model helps in analysing existing conflict dynamics and repeatedly occurring conflicts with the goal of enabling the development of understanding and a change of behaviour. The model uses insights from a systemic approach on human communication, research on cognitive biases as well as motivational psychology and research on the interrelation of emotions, stress and coping behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bodtker, A. M. & Jameson, J. K. (2001). Emotion In Conflict Formation and its Transformation: Application to Organizational Conflict Management. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(3), 259–275 doi.org/10.1108/eb022858

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, J. M., MacRae, S. K., Bell, J. & Singer, P. A. (2005). Top 10 health care ethics challenges facing the public: views of Toronto bioethicists. BMC Medical Ethics. 6 (5), 5–8. doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-6-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C.S. & Scheier M.F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behaviour. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Condit, C.M. (2006). Communication as Relationality. In G.J. Shepherd, J. St. John & T. Striphas (Eds.) Communication as…Perspectives on Theory (pp. 3–12). Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D. & Tyler, T.R. (2007). The Effects of Trust in Authority and Procedural Fairness on Cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (3), 639–649. doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.639

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid M. & Diener E. (2009). Norms for Experiencing Emotions in Different Cultures: Inter- and Intranational Differences. In: Diener E. (eds) Culture and Well-Being. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0_9

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman S. & Lazarus, R. S. (1990). Coping and Emotion. In Nancy L. Stein, Bennett Leventhal, Thomas R. Trabasso (Eds.), Psychological and Biological Approaches To Emotion (pp. 313–333). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda N. & Scherer K.R. (2009). Emotion definitions (psychological perspectives). In D Sander, KR Scherer (Eds.), Oxford Companion to Emotion and the Affective Sciences (pp. 200–202). Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D.T. & Malone, P.S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, E.M. (2012). A first look at Communication Theory (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall J. (1969). Conflict Management survey: A survey of one’s characteristic reaction to and handling of conflict between himself and others. Conroe, TX: Teleometrics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. S. (2000). Emotional communication in conflict: Essence and impact. In W. Eadie & P. Nelson (Eds.), The language of conflict and resolution (pp. 81–104). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. S. (2006). Emotion in mediation: Implications, applications, opportunities and challenges. In M. Herrmann (Ed.), Handbook of mediation, (pp. 277–306). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. S. & Bodtker, A. M. (2001). Mediating with Heart in Mind: Addressing Emotion in Mediation Practice. Negotiation Journal, 17(3), 217–244. doi.org/10.1023/A:1013283710190

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behaviour. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (2001). Relational Meaning and Discrete Emotions. In K.R. Scherer, A. Schorr & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal Processes in Emotion, Theory, Methods, Research (pp. 37–67). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N. & Förster, J. (2008). Expectancy, value and psychological distance: A new look at goal gradients. Social Cognition, 26, 515–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A. & Latham, G.P. (2002). Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation. A 35-Year Odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717 doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.57.9.705

    Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B. F. (1999). How people explain behaviour: A new theoretical framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B.F. (2006). The Actor–Observer Asymmetry in Attribution: A (Surprising) Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132 (6), 895–919. doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B.F., Knobe, J.M. & Nelson, S.E. (2007). Actor–observer asymmetries in explanations of behaviour: New answers to an old question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93 (4), 491. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.491.supp

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, W. U., Reisenzein, R., & Schützwohl, A. (1997). Towards a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21, 251–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monzani, D., Steca, P., Greco, A., D’Addario, M., Pancani, L. & Cappelletti, E. (2015). Effective pursuit of personal goals: The fostering effect of dispositional optimism on goal commitment and goal progress, Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 203–214, doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noordewier, M.K. & Breugelmans, S.M. (2013). On the valence of surprise, Cognition and Emotion, 27 (7), 1326–1334. doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.777660

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D.G. & Rubin, J.Z. (1986). Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate ana Settlement. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisenzein, R., & Meyer, W. U. (2009). Surprise. In D. Sander, & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Oxford companion to the affective sciences (pp. 386–387). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, I. (2001). A Model of Appraisal in the Emotion System. In K.R. Scherer, A. Schorr & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal Processes in Emotion, Theory, Methods, Research (pp. 68–91). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. & Moors, A. (2019). The Emotion Process: Event Appraisal and Component Differentiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 70 (1), 719–745. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A. & Johnstone, T. (Eds.). (2001). Appraisal Processes in Emotion, Theory, Methods, Research (pp. 37–67). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz von Thun, F. (2008). Miteinander reden: 1–3 (Sonderauflage). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifart, C., Simon, A. & Schmidt, K. W. (2016). Ambulante Ethikberatung in Deutschland – eine Landkarte bestehender Konzepte und Strukturen. Ungekürzter Beitrag, der auf einer Umfrage zur ambulanten Ethikberatung im Rahmen einer deutschlandweiten Tagung „Ambulante Ethikberatung in Deutschland – aktueller Stand und künftige Entwicklung“ im Oktober 2016 basiert. https://www.laekh.de/images/Hessisches_Aerzteblatt/2018/04_2018/Langversion_Amb_Ethiberatung_Seifart.pdf (Abruf am 20.05.2018).

  • Shepherd, G. J, St. John, J. & Striphas, T. (Eds.). (2006). Communication as…Perspectives on Theory. Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, M. A. (1999). Love, Hate, and Other Emotional Interference in the Lawyer/Client Relationship. 6 Clinical L. Rev. 259, 259–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, M. (1987). Toward a Revised Model of Attorney-Client Relationship: The Argument for Autonomy, N.C. L. Rev. 65 (2), 315–349. http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol65/iss2/3

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R. (2010). Cooperation as Joint Action. Analyse und Kritik 2,65–86. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Salisch, M. (Hrsg.). (2002). Emotionale Kompetenz entwickeln. Grundlagen in Kindheit und Jugend. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schlippe, A. & Schweitzer, J. (2012). Lehrbuch der systemischen Therapie und Beratung I. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht: Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J.B., Jackson, D.D. (2011). Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns. WW Norton & Co: New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, A. L. (1999). Infants’ ability to distinguish between purposeful and non-purposeful behaviors. Infant Behavior and Development, 22,145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortman, C.B. & Brehm J.W. (1975). Response to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration to reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In: L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 8, Academic Press, New York, 277–336.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Lebensgestaltung-Ethik-Religionskunde, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

    Maike Baumann

Authors
  1. Maike Baumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maike Baumann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Catholic Adult Education of Germany, Römerberg, Germany

    Elisabeth Vanderheiden

  2. Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Claude-Hélène Mayer

  3. Institut für Therapeutische Kommunikation und Sprachgebrauch, Europa Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany

    Claude-Hélène Mayer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baumann, M. (2020). Qualities of Communication Failures in Hierarchical Relationships: A Theoretical Model for Conflict Prevention. In: Vanderheiden, E., Mayer, CH. (eds) Mistakes, Errors and Failures across Cultures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35574-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation