Skip to main content

The Entrepreneurship Education Stakeholder Within Universities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Recognising, analysing, and engaging with the organisational stakeholder has been a long-standing consideration and concern for business owners, and now universities, globally. Appreciating stakeholder theory, and analysis, informs entrepreneurial activities and can lead to heightened levels of economic success. In this chapter, Crammond contextualises contemporary stakeholder theory within the educational environment, focusing on the progression of entrepreneurship education practice. The key individuals within education—educators, support staff, and students—all determine the fortunes of educational journeys and potential, enterprising activity. These stakeholders embody particular roles and responsibilities centred on enterprise, which influence and impact upon behaviours, attitudes, and ultimately entrepreneurial intentions. This chapter discusses and conceptually documents the many personalities or archetypes within higher education, and how they shape the modern university.

The people we meet can influence, but society should inspire.

Robert James Crammond

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acs, Z. J. (2007) ‘How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth?’ American Institute for Economic Research: Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization. Vol.1(1), pp. 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. (2011) New Venture Creation. International ed, 6th rev ed. London: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A. and Magalhaes, A. (2002) ‘The emergent role of external stakeholders in European higher education governance’. Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance. Vol.1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H.I. (1965) Corporate Strategy: Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S.R. (1969) ‘A ladder of citizen participation’. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. Vol.35(4), pp. 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barringer, B. R. and Ireland, D. (2012) Entrepreneurship: Successfully Launching New Ventures. 4th ed. London: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, R. and Beresford, K. (2010) ‘The role of networks in supporting grassroots good practice in enterprise education’. Research in Post-Compulsory Education. Vol.15(3), pp. 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglann, H., Moen, E. R., Røed, K. and Skogstrøm, J. F. (2011) ‘Entrepreneurship: Origins and returns’. Labour Economics. Vol.18(2), pp. 180–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicknell, A., Francis-Smythe, J. and Arthur, J. (2010) ‘Knowledge transfer: de-constructing the entrepreneurial academic’. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research. Vol.16(6), pp. 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, B. and Thompson, J. (2004) Entrepreneurs: Talent, Temperament, Technique. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxer, R., Perren, L. and Berry, A. (2013) ‘SME top management team and non-executive director cohesion precarious equilibrium through information asymmetry’. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. Vol.20(1), pp. 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus, R. H., Hills, G. E., Klandt, H. and Welsch, H. P. (Eds.) (2001) Entrepreneurship education: A global view. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. R., Daniels, P. W. and Ingram, D. R. (1999) ‘Evaluating the impact of business link on the performance and profitability of SMEs in the United Kingdom’. Policy Studies. Vol.20(2), pp. 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, D. A. and Huczynski, A. A. (2010) Organizational Behaviour. 7th ed. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. (2006) Entrepreneurs Toolkit. London: Burke Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, P. (2011) Entrepreneurship and Small Business: Start-up, Growth and Maturity. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979) ‘A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance’. Academy of Management Review. Vol.4(4), pp. 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. (1982) The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. (2005) ‘Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm’. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization. Vol.58(2), pp. 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M., Yeung, B. and Basu, A. (2008) The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J. B. and Lischeron, J. (1991) ‘Defining entrepreneurship’. Journal of Small Business Management. Vol.29(1), pp. 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L. (2011) The New Era of Management. International ed. Ohio: Thomson South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana, L. P. (2011) World Encyclopaedia of Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dew, N. and Sarasvathy, S. D. (2007) ‘Innovations, stakeholders and entrepreneurship’. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol.74(3), pp. 267–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, S.D. and Hynes, B.C. (2012) ‘The impact of regional entrepreneurial contexts upon enterprise education’. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. Vol.24(9–10), pp. 741–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995) ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications’. Academy of Management Review. Vol.20(1), pp. 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Down, S. and Warren, L. (2008) ‘Constructing narratives of enterprise: clichés and entrepreneurial self-identity’. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research. Vol.14(1), pp. 4–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. (1998) ‘Analysing and comparing idiographic causal maps’. Managerial and organizational cognition: Theory, methods and research. pp. 192–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012) Entrepreneurship Education at School in Europe: National Strategies, Curricula and Learning Outcomes. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, March 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2015) Entrepreneurship Education: A Road To Success. A compilation of evidence on the impact of entrepreneurship education strategies and measures. Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, A. and Klandt, H. (2006) (Eds.) International Entrepreneurship Education: Issues and Newness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1994) ‘The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions’. Business Ethics Quarterly. Vol.4(4).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. and Phillips, R. A. (2002) ‘Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defence’. Business Ethics Quarterly. pp. 331–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Parmar, B.L. and De Colle, S. (2010) Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., Wicks, A.C. and Parmar, B. (2004) ‘Stakeholder theory and ‘the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science. Vol.15(3), pp. 364–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A.L. and Miles, S. (2006) Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A.A. (1990) ‘Entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship: Exploring the differences’. New Findings and Perspectives in Entrepreneurship. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A.A. and Haskins, G. (2014) ‘The university of the future an entrepreneurial stakeholder learning organisation?’ Handbook on the Entrepreneurial University. Vol.25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimmon, E. (2014) ‘Mentoring as a practical training in higher education of entrepreneurship’. Education and Training. Vol.56(8/9), pp. 814–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. (2006) ‘Absorptive capacity, knowledge management and innovation in entrepreneurial small firms’. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research. Vol.12(6), pp. 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán, J. and Liñán, F. (2005) ‘Perspectives on Entrepreneurial Education: A US-Europe Comparison’. Jean Monnet European Studies Centre Universidad Antonio de Nebrija.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. S. and Freeman, R. E. (1999) ‘Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives’. Academy of Management Journal. Vol.42(5), pp. 479–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, E. (1982) ‘The sociology of entrepreneurship’. In Encyclopaedia of Entrepreneurship. pp. 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hébert, R.F. and Link, A.N. (1988) The Entrepreneur: Mainstream Views and Radical Critiques. Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinings, C.R. and Greenwood, R. (2002) ‘Disconnects and consequences in organization theory?’ Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol.47(3), pp. 411–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornaday, J.A. (1982) ‘Research about living entrepreneurs’. In Encyclopaedia of Entrepreneurship, pp. 20–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hytti, U. and O’Gorman, C. (2004) ‘What is “enterprise education”? An analysis of the objectives and methods of enterprise education programmes in four European countries’. Education and Training. Vol.46(1), pp. 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jack, S. L. and Anderson, A. R. (1999) ‘Entrepreneurship education within the enterprise culture: Producing reflective practitioners’. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research. Vol.5(3), pp. 110–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2011) Teaching Entrepreneurship to Undergraduates. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2013) Teaching Entrepreneurship to Postgraduates. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Matlay, H. and Maritz, A. (2012) ‘Enterprise education: for all, or just some?’ Education and Training. Vol.54(8/9), pp. 813–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, A. and McLoughlin, D. (2010) ‘The entrepreneurial imagination and the impact of context on the development of a new venture’. Industrial Marketing Management. Vol.39, pp. 996–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, C. A. (Ed.). (1990) Entrepreneurship Education: Current Developments, Future Directions. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, F., Webber, D.J., Plumridge, A. and Robertson, S. (2015) ‘University entrepreneurship education experiences: enhancing the entrepreneurial ecosystems in a UK city-region’. In The 8th International Conference for Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Regional Development (p. 794).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolvereid, L. and Moen, Ø. (1997) ‘Entrepreneurship among business graduates: does a major in entrepreneurship make a difference?’ Journal of European Industrial Training. Vol.21(4), pp. 154–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F. (2005) ‘The emergence of entrepreneurship education: development, trends, and challenges’. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Vol.29(5), pp. 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K. and Litz, R. A. (2008) ‘Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us’. Journal of Management. Vol.34(6), pp. 1152–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (1997) ‘The motivation of women entrepreneurs in Singapore’. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research. Vol.3(2), pp. 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M. and Peterson, S. J. (2000) ‘Culture, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Global Competitiveness’. Journal of World Business. Vol.35(4), pp. 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., Li, P. and Chen, J. (2006) ‘Social capital, capabilities, and entrepreneurial strategies: a study of Taiwanese high-tech new ventures’. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol.73, pp. 168–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lourenço, F., Taylor, T. G. and Taylor, D. W. (2013). ‘Integrating ‘education for entrepreneurship’ in multiple faculties in “half-the-time” to enhance graduate entrepreneurship’. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. Vol.20(3), pp. 503–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, I. C., Siegel, R. and Subba Narasimha, P. N. (1985) ‘Criteria used by Venture Capitalists to Evaluate New Venture Proposals’. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, pp. 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcoux, A. M. (2000) ‘Business ethics gone wrong’. National Emergency Training Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcoux, A. M. (2003) ‘A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory’. Business Ethics Quarterly. Vol.13(1), pp. 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marić, I. (2013) ‘Stakeholder Analysis of Higher Education Institutions’. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems. Vol.11(2), pp. 217–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlay, H. (2005a) ‘Researching entrepreneurship and education: Part 1: what is entrepreneurship and does it matter?’ Education and Training. Vol.47(8/9), pp. 665–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlay, H. (2005b) ‘Entrepreneurship education in UK business schools: conceptual, contextual and policy considerations’. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. Vol.12(4), pp. 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlay, H. (2006a) ‘Entrepreneurship education: more questions than answers?’ Education and Training. Vol.48(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlay, H. (2006b) ‘Researching entrepreneurship and education: Part 2: what is entrepreneurship education and does it matter?’ Education and Training. Vol.48(8/9), pp. 704–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlay, H. (2008) ‘The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial outcomes’. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. Vol.15(2), pp. 382–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlay, H. (2009) ‘Entrepreneurship education in the UK: a critical analysis of stakeholder involvement and expectations’. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. Vol.16(2), pp. 355–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlay, H. (2011) ‘The influence of stakeholders on developing enterprising graduates in UK HEIs’. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research. Vol.17(2), pp. 166–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, M., Miller, K. and McAdam, R. (2016) ‘Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective’. Technovation. Vol.50, pp. 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. H. and Crane, F. G. (2011) Entrepreneurship: An Innovator’s Guide to Startups and Corporate Ventures. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K., McAdam, M. and McAdam, R. (2014) ‘The changing university business model: a stakeholder perspective’. RandD Management. Vol.44(3), pp. 265–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. (1997) ‘Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts’. Academy of Management Review. Vol.22(4), pp. 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neck, H. M. and Greene, P. G. (2011) ‘Entrepreneurship education: known worlds and new frontiers’. Journal of Small Business Management. Vol.49(1), pp. 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E. and Wicks, A. C. (2003) ‘What stakeholder theory is not’. Business Ethics Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pihkala, T., Ruskovaara, E., Seikkula-Leino, J. and Rytkölä, T. (2011) ‘Entrepreneurship education-what is really happening in class rooms?’ Yrittäjyyskasvatuspäivät. Vol.10(6/7). Lappeenranta. ISBN 978-952-265-139-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. (2004) ‘Practical theories from entrepreneurs’ stories: discursive approaches to entrepreneurial learning. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. Vol.11(2), pp. 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. (2005) ‘Entrepreneurial learning: a narrative-based conceptual model’. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. Vol.12(3), pp. 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. (2007) Entrepreneurship: From Opportunity to Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. (2002) ‘Employing normative stakeholder theory in developing countries a critical theory perspective’. Business and Society. Vol.41(2), pp. 166–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasi, V. and Arenius, P. (2008) ‘International New Ventures and Social Networks: Advantage or Liability?’ European Management Journal. Vol.26, pp. 400–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M.A. (2000) ‘Decades ahead of her time: advancing stakeholder theory through the ideas of Mary Parker Follett’. Journal of Management History. Vol.6(5), pp. 224–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A. (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stainer, L. (2004) ‘Ethical dimensions of management decision-making’. Strategic Change. Vol.13(6), pp. 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starik, M. (1993) ‘Is the environment an organizational stakeholder? Naturally’. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society. Vol.466, pp. 471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R.N. and Barley, S.R. (1996) ‘Organizations and social systems: Organization theory’s neglected mandate’. Administrative Science Quarterly. pp. 146–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1997) Successful Intelligence. First Agency Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. and Lubart, T.I. (1996) ‘Investing in creativity’. American Psychologist. Vol.51(7), pp. 677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D., Wilson, N. and Mador, M. (2010) Entrepreneurship. London: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J. and Bessant, J. (2009) Managing Innovation. Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. 4th ed. London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turker, D. and Selcuk, S. S. (2009) ‘Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students?’ Journal of European Industrial Training. Vol.33(2), pp. 142–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., and Wright, M. (2001) ‘The focus of entrepreneurial research: contextual and process issues’. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Vol.25(4), pp. 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkmann, C., Wilson, K.E., Marlotti, S., Rabuzzi, D., Vyakarnam, S. and Sepulveda, A. (2009) Educating the Next Wave of Entrepreneurs-Unlocking entrepreneurial capabilities to meet the global challenges of the 21st Century. A Report of the Global Education Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P. and Wright, M. (1998) ‘Novice, portfolio, and serial founders: are they different?’ Journal of Business Venturing. Vol.13(3), pp. 173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyer, M.V. (1996) ‘In an ideal world’. Management Today. September, pp. 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieneke, A. and Gries, T. (2011) ‘SME Performance in Transition Economies: The Financial Regulation and Firm-Level Corruption Nexus’. Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol.39, pp. 221–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert James Crammond .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Crammond, R.J. (2020). The Entrepreneurship Education Stakeholder Within Universities. In: Advancing Entrepreneurship Education in Universities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35191-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics