Skip to main content

Policy Analyses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Media and Communications Policy Making

Part of the book series: Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business ((GMPB))

  • 603 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores how policy analyses are made in preparing, promoting or analyzing policy options. It explores steps in examining issues, gathers and presents information and presents and examines alternatives and their potential outcomes. It describes the growing emphasis on evidence-based policymaking, the nature of evidence and its implications and how these inform policy-making efforts. It introduces and illustrates various analysis techniques, such as strategic analysis (SWOT analysis, the strategic triangle model, risk analysis and decision trees), environmental analysis (Delphi technique, stakeholder analysis, systems analysis), needs assessment (statistical and qualitative studies, case studies) and outcome analysis (cost-benefit analysis, financial analysis, econometric analysis).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bardach, Eugene. 2005. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Patrick, and Robert G. Picard. 2014. What If There Were No BBC Television? The Net Impact on UK Viewers. RISJ Report. Oxford: Reuters Institute, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Johannes M. 2010. Learning from Each Other: Promises and Pitfalls of Benchmarking in Communications Policy. Info 12 (6): 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, Anthony E., David H. Greenberg, Aidan R. Vining, and David L. Weimer. 2017. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschneider, Karen, and Thomas J. Corbett. 2010. Evidence-Based Policy Making: Insights from Policy-Minded Researchers and Research-Minded Policy Makers. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Harry F., and Richard P.C. Brown. 2015. Cost-Benefit Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, Jeannie. 2002. Cultural Statistics in Europe: Updates and Trends. UNESCO International Symposium on Cultural Statistics, Montréal, Canada, 21–23 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy, and Jeremy Hardie. 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom. 2016. Assessing the Risk for Media Pluralism in EU and Beyond: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor Tool (MPM 2016) in 30 European Countries. Florence: European University Centre. http://cmpf.eui.eu/News/All/1601MPM2016Grant.aspx. Accessed 09 Dec 2018.

  • European Commission. 2001. Executive Summary: Identification and Evaluation of Financial Flows within the European Cinema Industry by Comparison with the American Model. Study for the European Commission, Directorate General for Education and Culture, Unit C1. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. 2001. Special Feature on Publishing and Printing. Brussels: Eurostat Structural Business Statistics Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, David P., and Maria M. Ttofi. 2009. Reducing School Bullying: Evidence-Based Implications for Policy. Crime and Justice 38 (1): 281–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansberger, Anders. 2001. What Is the Policy Problem? Methodological Challenges in Policy Evaluation. Evaluation 7 (1): 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawton, Keith, and Kathryn Williams. 2005. Media Influences on Suicidal Behaviour: Evidence and Prevention. In Prevention and Treatment of Suicidal Behaviour: From Science to Practice, ed. Keith Hawton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, Jeremy. 2007. Tools for Institutional, Political, and Social Analysis of Policy Reform: A Sourcebook for Development Practitioners. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, Rick H., ed. 2014. Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Max, and Kjell Johnson. 2013. Applied Predictive Modeling. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Linstone, Harold A., and Murray Turoff, eds. 1975. Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Boston: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, John F. 1964. Decision Trees for Decision Making. Harvard Business Review 42 (4): 126–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, Ann, and M. Lynne Markus. 2013. Methods for Policy Research: Taking Socially Responsible Action. 2nd ed, 2013. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, Greg, and Rob Watts. 2003. Tampering with the Evidence: A Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Policy Making. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs 3 (3): 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morçöl, GöktuÄŸ, and Nadezda P. Ivanova. 2010. Methods Taught in Public Policy Programs: Are Quantitative Methods Still Prevalent? Journal of Public Affairs Education 16 (2): 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, Scott. 2002. Policy Analysis from First Principles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 99, No. 10, Supplement 3: Arthur M. Sackler Colloquium of the National Academy of Sciences. Sackler Colloquium on Adaptive Agents, Intelligence, and Emergent Human Organization: Capturing Complexity Though Agent-Based Modeling (May 14, 2002), 7267–7274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, Stanley A. 2009. Linear Causal Modeling with Structural Equations. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Stuart S. 2002. Handbook of Public Policy Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, David, and Colin Kirkpatrick. 2005. Privatisation in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence and the Policy Lessons. Journal of Development Studies 41 (4): 513–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, Ray. 2006. Evidence Based Policy: A Realistic Approach. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, Robert G., and Timo E. Toivonen. 2004. Issues in Assessment of the Economic Impact of Copyright. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues 1 (1): 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, Gerry, ed. 2016. Evidence-Based Policy Making in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, John W., and Kathleen Dolan Swain. 2015. Effective Writing in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valcke, Peggy, Robert Picard, Miklos Sükösd, Beata Klimkiewicz, Brankica Petkovic, and Cinzia dal Zotto. 2010. The European Media Pluralism Monitor: Bridging Law, Economics, and Media Studies as a First Step towards Risk-Based Regulation in Media Markets. Journal of Media Law 2 (1): 85–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bulck, Hilde, Manuel Puppis, Karen Donders, and Leo van Audenhove, eds. 2019. The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veselý, ArnoÅ¡t. 2007. Problem Delimitation in Public Policy Analysis. Central European Journal of Public Policy 1 (1): 80–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollmann, Helmut. 2006. Policy Evaluation and Evaluation Research. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, ed. Frank Fischer and Gerald J. Miller, 393–404. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Suggested Readings

  • Campbell, Harry F, and Richard P.C. Brown. 2015. Cost-Benefit Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy, and Jeremy Hardie. 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, Ann, and M. Lynne Markus. 2013. Methods for Policy Research: Taking Socially Responsible Action, 2nd ed. London: Sage 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, John W., and Kathleen Dolan Swain. 2015. Effective Writing in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bulck, Hilde, Manuel Puppis, Karen Donders, and Leo van Audenhove, eds. 2019. The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert G. Picard .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Picard, R.G. (2020). Policy Analyses. In: Media and Communications Policy Making. Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35173-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics