Skip to main content

A Longitudinal Study on Twitter-Based Forecasting of Five Dutch National Elections

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11864))

Abstract

We report on an eight-year longitudinal study of predicting the outcome of elections based on party mentions in tweets. Five Dutch national elections for the parliament and senate between 2011 and 2019 were examined. Configurations with four parameters were tested. For three elections, reasonably accurate predictions can be obtained that are under twice the error of the classic polls, but only after post-hoc optimization. When the same optimal parameter configuration is used for all elections, the results worsen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://home.noties.nl/peil/.

References

  1. Anuta, D., Churchin, J., Luo, J.: Election bias: comparing polls and twitter in the 2016 us election. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06232 (2017)

  2. De Hond, M.: Dutch Election Polls (2011–2019). https://home.noties.nl/peil/wekelijkse-stemming/

  3. Dwi Prasetyo, N., Hauff, C.: Twitter-based election prediction in the developing world. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media, pp. 149–158. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gaurav, M., Srivastava, A., Kumar, A., Miller, S.: Leveraging candidate popularity on Twitter to predict election outcome. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis, p. 7. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gayo-Avello, D.: I wanted to predict elections with Twitter and all I got was this Lousy Paper”-a balanced survey on election prediction using Twitter data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.6441 (2012)

  6. Gayo-Avello, D.: No, you cannot predict elections with Twitter. IEEE Internet Comput. 16(6), 91–94 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gayo-Avello, D.: A meta-analysis of state-of-the-art electoral prediction from Twitter data. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 31, 649–679 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gayo-Avello, D., Metaxas, P.T., Mustafaraj, E.: Limits of electoral predictions using twitter. In: Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huberty, M.: Can we vote with our tweet? On the perennial difficulty of election forecasting with social media. Int. J. Forecast. 31(3), 992–1007 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ibrahim, M., Abdillah, O., Wicaksono, A.F., Adriani, M.: Buzzer detection and sentiment analysis for predicting presidential election results in a Twitter nation. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW), pp. 1348–1353. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jungherr, A., Jürgens, P., Schoen, H.: Why the pirate party won the German election of 2009 or the trouble with predictions: a response to Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T.O, Sander, P.G., Welpe, I.M. “predicting elections with Twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 30(2), 229–234 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kagan, V., Stevens, A., Subrahmanian, V.: Using Twitter sentiment to forecast the 2013 Pakistani election and the 2014 Indian election. IEEE Intell. Syst. 30(1), 2–5 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Murthy, D.: Twitter and elections: are tweets, predictive, reactive, or a form of buzz? Inf. Commun. Soc. 18(7), 816–831 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanders, E., Van den Bosch, A.: Relating political party mentions on twitter with polls and election results. In: Proceedings of DIR-2013, pp. 68–71 (2013). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-986/paper_9.pdf

  15. Sanders, E., de Gier, M., van den Bosch, A.: Using demographics in predicting election results with Twitter. In: Spiro, E., Ahn, Y.-Y. (eds.) SocInfo 2016. LNCS, vol. 10047, pp. 259–268. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47874-6_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sloan, L., Morgan, J., Burnap, P., Williams, M.: Who tweets? Deriving the demographic characteristics of age, occupation and social class from Twitter user meta-data. PLoS ONE 10(3), e0115545 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tjong Kim Sang, E., Van den Bosch, A.: Dealing with big data: the case of Twitter. Comput. Linguist. Neth. J. 3, 121–134 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tjong Kim Sang, E., Bos, J.: Predicting the 2011 Dutch senate election results with Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Analysis in Social Media, pp. 53–60. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsakalidis, A., Papadopoulos, S., Cristea, A.I., Kompatsiaris, Y.: Predicting elections for multiple countries using Twitter and polls. IEEE Intell. Syst. 30(2), 10–17 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T.O., Sandner, P.G., Welpe, I.M.: Predicting elections with Twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. ICWSM 10, 178–185 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, L., Gan, J.Q.: Prediction of the 2017 French election based on twitter data analysis using term weighting. In: 2018 10th Computer Science and Electronic Engineering (CEEC), pp. 231–235. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Sanders .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix

A Absolute Errors for all parties

Table 6. Results per party and Absolute Error for all elections of the configuration that scores best for that particular election (see Table 4)
Table 7. Results per party and Absolute Error for all elections of the configuration that scores best overall
Table 8. Results per party and Absolute Error for all elections of the polls

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sanders, E., van den Bosch, A. (2019). A Longitudinal Study on Twitter-Based Forecasting of Five Dutch National Elections. In: Weber, I., et al. Social Informatics. SocInfo 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11864. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34971-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34971-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34970-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34971-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics