Abstract
Applied researchers are often forced to test an uninteresting (and unrealistic) hypothesis: that the mean difference between groups is zero in some imagined population. Misinterpretation of these common null hypothesis tests often obscure actual findings, and the testing process itself can result in inflated estimates over time. In this paper, we demonstrate the use of freely available software to conduct Bayesian hypothesis tests on ENA findings, in addition to traditional null hypothesis testing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Begley, C.G., Ioannidis, J.P.: Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circ. Res. 116(1), 116–126 (2015)
JASP Team: JASP (Version 0.9.2) [Computer software] (2019)
McShane, B.B., Gal, D., Gelman, A., Robert, C., Tackett, J.L.: Abandon statistical significance. Am. Stat. 73(Suppl. 1), 235–245 (2019)
Leppink, J., Winston, K., O’Sullivan, P.: Statistical significance does not imply a real effect. Perspect. Med. Educ. 5(2), 122–124 (2016)
Gelman, A., Carlin, J.: Beyond power calculations: assessing type S (sign) and type M (magnitude) errors. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 9(6), 641–651 (2014)
McElreath, R.: Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan, vol. 122. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)
Jeffreys, H.: Theory of Probability, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1961)
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Morey, R.D., Lee, M.D.: Bayesian benefits for the pragmatic researcher. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 25, 169–176 (2016)
Timm, A.: retrodesign: Tools for Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. R package version 0.1.0 (2019)
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2019)
Kruschke, J.K.: Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142(2), 573 (2013)
Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., Dunson, D.B., Vehtari, A., Rubin, D.B.: Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shane Tutwiler, M. (2019). Post-hoc Bayesian Hypothesis Tests in Epistemic Network Analyses. In: Eagan, B., Misfeldt, M., Siebert-Evenstone, A. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33231-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33232-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)