Skip to main content

Interviewing ‘the Powerful’ in Crime and Crime Control

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 834 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter enters conceptual discussions on the notions of ‘the powerful’, ‘elites’ and ‘experts’. It discusses what makes elite and expert interviewing specific and why researchers would be interested in conducting qualitative interviews with the powerful, particularly within the study area of criminology. Simultaneously, the chapter highlights how the book intends to overcome a lack of systematic methodological reflection on using interviews with the powerful, when asking them about sensitive issues. The chapter underscores the importance of fostering critical, reflexive and ethical attitudes throughout the entire research process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abels, G., & Behrens, M. (2009). Interviewing experts in political science: A reflection on gender and policy effects based on secondary analysis. In G. Abels & M. Behrens (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 138–156). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar, L. L. M. (2012). Redirecting the academic gaze upward. In L. L. M. Aguiar & C. J. Schneider (Eds.), Researching amongst elites: Challenges and opportunities in studying up (pp. 1–28). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar, L. L. M., & Schneider, C. J. (Eds.). (2012). Researching amongst elites: Challenges and opportunities in studying up. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. E., & Corneli, A. (2018). 100 questions (and answers) about research ethics. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (1997/1963]). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyens, K., Kennes, P., & Tournel, H. (2010). Mijnwerkers of ontdekkingsreizigers? Het kwalitatieve interview. In T. Decorte & D. Zaitch (Eds.), Kwalitatieve methoden en technieken in de criminologie (pp. 187–221). Leuven: Acco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (Eds.). (2009). Interviewing experts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busino, G. (1992). Élites et élitisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copes, H., Jacques, S., Hochstetler, A., & Dickinson, T. (2015). Interviewing offenders. In H. Copes & J. M. Miller (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of qualitative criminology (pp. 157–172). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Copes, H., & Miller, J. M. (Eds.). (2015). The Routledge handbook of qualitative criminology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copes, H., Tewksbury, R., & Sandberg, S. (2016). Publishing qualitative research in criminology and criminal justice journals. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(1), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousin, B., Khan, S., & Mears, A. (2018). Theoretical and methodological pathways for research on elites. Socio-Economic Review, 16(2), 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, D. (2013). Becoming criminal: The socio-cultural origins of law, transgression, and deviance. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham-Sabot, E. (1999). Dr Jekyl and Mr H(i)de: The contrasting face of elites at interview. Geoforum, 30(4), 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, M. (2004). Methodological challenges posed in studying an elite in the field. Area, 36(3), 262–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, L. A. (1970). Elite and specialized interviewing. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R., & Holland, J. (2013). What is qualitative interviewing? London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N., & Scotson, J. (1994). The established and the outsiders. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, J., Hayward, K. J., & Young, J. (2015). Cultural criminology: An invitation (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (Ed.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York: Random House USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganter, S. A. (2017). Perception and articulation of own cultural otherness in elite interview situations: Challenge or repertoire? The Qualitative Report, 22(4), 942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2010). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, K. (2003). Getting in the door: Sampling and completing elite interviews. Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 669–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, W. S. (2011). Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, K. J. (2016). Cultural criminology: Script rewrites. Theoretical Criminology, 20(3), 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herod, A. (1999). Reflections on interviewing foreign elites: Praxis, positionality, validity, and the cult of the insider. Geoforum, 30(4), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitzler, R., Honer, A., & Maeder, C. (Eds.). (1994). Expertenwissen - die institutionalisierte Kompetenz. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A., & Cormode, L. (1998). Researching elites and elite spaces. Environment and Planning, 30, 2098–2100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, R. (2014). Qualitative Experteninterviews: Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und praktische Durchführung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2003). Transformational elite interviews: Principles and problems. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleck, G., & Roberts, K. (2012). What survey modes are most effective in eliciting self-reports of criminal or delinquent behavior? In L. Gideon (Ed.), Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences (pp. 417–439). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (2005). The dominance of dialogical interview research: A critical view. Barn, 3, 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (2015). Qualitative research on elite frauds, ordinary frauds, and “organized crime”. In H. Copes & J. M. Miller (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of qualitative criminology (pp. 215–235). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilleker, D. G. (2003). Interviewing the political elite: Navigating a potential minefield. Politics, 23(3), 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M., Baker, O., & Hardy, R. (2007). Drugwatch: Establishing the practicality and feasibility of using key professionals and illicit drug users to identify emerging drug tendencies. Qualitative Social Research, 8(3), online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1990). The focused problems and procedures. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (2009). The expert interview and changes in knowledge production. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 17–42). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mikecz, R. (2012). Interviewing elites. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(6), 482–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. M., Copes, H., & Hochstetler, A. (2015). The history and evolution of qualitative criminology. In H. Copes & J. M. Miller (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of qualitative criminology (pp. 3–21). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S., & Mclaughlin, E. (2009). Researching up? Interviews, emotionality and policy-making elites. Journal of Social Policy, 38(4), 689–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noaks, L., & Wincup, E. (2004). Criminological research: Understanding qualitative methods. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petintseva, O. (2018). Youth justice and migration: Discursive harms. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. (1998). Ideology in the language of judges: How judges practice law, politics, and courtroom control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poupart, J., & Couvrette, A. (2018). Les méthodes qualitatives en « terrain criminologique » : mise en perspective et usage de ces méthodes dans la revue Criminologie. Criminologie, 51(1), 201–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, T. (2010). Learning to listen: Auscultation and the transmission of auditory knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16(1), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, D. (1996). Elite interviewing: Approaches and pitfalls. Politics, 16(3), 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, S. W., Kozyreva, P. M., & Sarovskii, E. G. (2002). Interviewing political elites: Lessons from Russia. Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 683–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, N. (2007). Collecting data from elites and ultra-elites: Telephone and face-to-face interviews with macroeconomists. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tieberghien, J. (2014). Interviewing ‘elites’ in examining the science-policy nexus: Some methodological reflections. In G. Potter, M. Wouters, & J. Fountain (Eds.), Change and continuity: Researching evolving drug landscapes in Europe (pp. 123–138). Paris: PABST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Audenhove, L., & Donders, K. (2019). Talking to people III: Expert interviews and elite interviews. In H. Van den Bulck, M. Puppis, K. Donders, & L. Van Audenhove (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of methods for media policy research (pp. 179–197). London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, C., Marschan-Piekkari, R., Penttinen, H., & Tahvanainen, M. (2002). Corporate elites as informants in qualitative international business research. International Business Review, 11(5), 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. (1998). Rethinking elites: Networks, space, and local politics. Environment and Planning, 30(12), 2101–2119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H. (1972). Interviewing an ultra-elite. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Petintseva .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Petintseva, O., Faria, R., Eski, Y. (2020). Interviewing ‘the Powerful’ in Crime and Crime Control. In: Interviewing Elites, Experts and the Powerful in Criminology. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33000-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33000-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32999-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33000-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics