Skip to main content

Social Entrepreneurship Theoretical Work Has Been Static

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Realistic Theory of Social Entrepreneurship
  • 544 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, Ashta introduces the reader to basic elements of social entrepreneurship research. He distinguishes the concept of social entrepreneurship from that of social enterprise and finds that there is a large overlap in research between the two. He introduces the concepts of both fields that would later be used as building blocks. Ashta’s primary contribution in this chapter is to show that research on both social entrepreneurship and social enterprise has been static. He also introduces his initial approach to the realistic theory of social entrepreneurship, which was based only on not-for-profits and was also static. Therefore, he shows there is room for research using a dynamic concept such as the life cycle theory to extend the realistic theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abela, A. V. (2014). Appealing to the Imagination: Effective and Ethical Marketing of Religion. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. K., Gerhards, J., & Romo, F. P. (1995). Forms of Capital and Social Structure in Cultural Fields: Examining Bourdieu’s Social Topography. American Journal of Sociology, 100(4), 859–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arend, R. J. (2013). A Heart-Mind-Opportunity Nexus: Distinguishing Social Entrepreneurship for Entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 313–315. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artois, S. (2015). Buy the Lady a Drink. Stella Artois: Matt Damon Announcement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashta, A. (2016). Towards a Realistic Theory of Social Entrepreneurship: Selling Dreams to Society. Burgundy School of Business. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2861345.

  • Ashta, A. (2019). Towards a Realistic Theory of Social Entrepreneurship (NGOs) Grounded on Microfinance Research: Selling Dreams to Society. Strategic Change: Briefings in Entrepreneurial Finance, 28(4), 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attewell, P., Suazo-Garcia, B., & Battle, J. (2003). Computers and Young Children: Social Benefit or Social Problem? Social Forces, 82(1), 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both? Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 30(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacq, S., & Eddleston, K. A. (2018). A Resource-Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: How Stewardship Culture Benefits Scale of Social Impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3317-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, K.-H., Kim, S.-B., & Kim, W. (2012). Family Control and Expropriation at Not-for-Profit Organizations: Evidence from Korean Private Universities. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(4), 388–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00922.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendickson, J., Muldoon, J., Liguori, E., & Davis, P. E. (2016). Agency Theory: The Times, They Are a-changin’. Management Decision, 54(1), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2015-0058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, K. (2018). Social Entrepreneurship: Performance Enactments of Compassion. In P. Dey & C. Steyaert (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship: An Affirmative Critique (pp. 159–181). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. A. (1975). Open Unemployment as a Social problem in Urban Columbia: Myth and Reality. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 23(2), 276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, P., & Ahmad, A. J. (2017). Financial Social Innovation to Engage the Economically Marginalized: Insights from an Indian Case Study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(5–6), 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986 [2011]). The Forms of Capital. Cultural Theory: An Anthology, 1, 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. C. (2000). Public Subsidies and Charitable Giving: Crowding Out, Crowding In, or Both? Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 19(3), 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, S. E., & Hoekstra, M. (2012). Family Business or Social Problem? The Cost of Unreported Domestic Violence. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 31(4), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaboud, M.-C. (2016). How Do the Crowdfunders Judge the Crowdfunded?: Crowdfunding, Social Capital, and the Gatekeepers of the Financial Legitimacy. In D. Assadi (Ed.), Strategic Approaches to Successful Crowdfunding (pp. 78–107). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998). Does Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy Distinguish Entrepreneurs from Managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chermesh, R. (1985). Strikes as Social Problems: A Social Problem Matrix Approach. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 23(2), 281–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cong, C., Michael, D., & Ming, X. H. (2017). Political Skill, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Organizational Justice: A Study of Entrepreneurial Enterprise in China. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2015-0103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corner, P. D., & Ho, M. (2010). How Opportunities Develop in Social Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 34(4), 635–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00382.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don’t Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagger, R., & MacDonald, H. M. (1982). Mugging as a Social Problem. Social Science Quarterly, 63(1), 188–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dart, R. (2018). Bursting the Bubble: The Mythologies of Many Social Enterprises and Enterpri$ing Nonprofits. In P. Dey & C. Steyaert (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship: An Affirmative Critique (pp. 65–71). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M., & Dean, M. (1998). Britain to Debate How to Plan for an Ageing Population. Lancet, 351(9105), 811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin, A., & Shaw, E. (2011). Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship: Extending Theory, Integrating Practice. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 29(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426110290010101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. (2012). A Tale of Two Cultures: Charity, Problem Solving, and the Future of Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1412-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. (1998). The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2006). Framing a Theory of Social Entrepreneurship: Building on Two Schools of Practice and Thought. In: R. Mosher-Williams (Ed.), Research on Social Entrepreneurship: Understanding and Contributing to an Emerging Field (Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 39–66). ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, S. E., & Sanders, M. L. (2010). Meaningful Work? Nonprofit Marketization and Work/Life Imbalance in Popular Autobiographies of Social Entrepreneurship. Organization, 17(4), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410364198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desa, G. (2012). Resource Mobilization in International Social Entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a Mechanism of Institutional Transformation. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 36(4), 727–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00430.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2006). The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. London, UK: Penguin Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003 [1961]). Folie et déraison: Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique [Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reasons]. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden-Biddle, K., & Rao, H. (1997). Breaches in the Boardroom: Organizational Identity and Conflicts of Commitment in a Nonprofit Organization. Organization Science, 8(6), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.6.593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., Vogus, T. J., & Miller, T. L. (2013). Studying the Origins of Social Entrepreneurship: Compassion and the Role of Embedded Agency. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 460–463. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., Matos, S., Sheehan, L., & Silvestre, B. (2012). Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the Base of the Pyramid: A Recipe for Inclusive Growth or Social Exclusion? Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 785–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01044.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. E. (1998). Skin Color Bias: A New Perspective on an Old Social Problem. Journal of Psychology, 132(2), 238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, M., & McKelvey, B. (2016). How to Grow Successful Social Entrepreneurship Firms? Key Ideas from Complexity Theory. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 24(3), 243–280. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495816500102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C., Maclean, M., Gordon, J., & Shaw, E. (2011). Andrew Carnegie and the Foundations of Contemporary Entrepreneurial Philanthropy. Business History, 53(3), 425–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugh, H., & Talwar, A. (2016). Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2449-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemme, F., Morais, D. G., Bowers, M. T., & Todd, J. S. (2017). Extending Sport-Based Entrepreneurship Theory Through Phenomenological Inquiry. Sport Management Review, 20(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2016.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlady-Rispal, M., & Servantie, V. (2018). Deconstructing the Way in Which Value Is Created in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffington, A. (2016). The Sleep Revolution: Transforming Your Life, One Night at a Time. New York: Harmony.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioana, M. I., Anda, M. I., Cornelia, P., & Mariana, C. R. (2015). School Dropout—A Social Problem in Romania. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 623–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, J. (2013). Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market. American Economic Review, 76(4), 728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, K., Haugh, H., & Fotaki, M. (2019). Organizational Form and Pro-Social Fantasy in Social Enterprise Creation. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718821413.

  • Kerlin, J. A. (2006). Social Enterprise in the United States and Abroad: Learning From Our Differences. In R. Mosher-Williams R (Ed.), Research on Social Entrepreneurship: Understanding and Contributing to an Emerging Field, (Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 105–126). ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimczuk, A. (2016). The Solidarity Economy Alternative: Emerging Theory and Practice. International Sociology, 31(2), 158–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580915627093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., & Maitlis, S. (2012). Care and Possibility: Enacting an Ethic of Care Through Narrative Practice. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 641–663. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. C. (2008). Microloan Sharks. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(3), 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmeier, J., Schleer, C., & Pricl, D. (2012). Consumer Outrage: Emotional Reactions to Unethical Corporate Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1364–1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, A. (1995). The Basic Social Processes of Entrepreneurial Innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 1(2), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552559510090622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lybbert, T. J. (2008). Exploring the Role of Spiritual Capital in Poverty Traps and Microfinance. Faith and Economics, 51, 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., Battilana, J., & Cardenas, J. (2012). Organizing for Society: A Typology of Social Entrepreneuring Models. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1414-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malloch, T. R. (2014). Practical Wisdom in Management: Business Across Spiritual Traditions. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinetto, M. (1999). The Historical Development of Business Philanthropy: Social Responsibility in the New Corporate Economy. Business History, 41(4), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauksch, S. (2017). Managing the Dance of Enchantment: An Ethnography of Social Entrepreneurship Events. Organization, 24(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508416644511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, J. S., & Warnick, B. J. (2016). Should We Require Every New Venture to Be a Hybrid Organization? Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), 630–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. (2012). Venturing for Others with Heart and Head: How Compassion Encourages Social Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 616–640. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, T. W., Renko, M., Block, E., & Meyskens, M. (2018). Funding the Story of Hybrid Ventures: Crowdfunder Lending Preferences and Linguistic Hybridity. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, D. (2009). Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nason, R. S., Bacq, S., & Gras, D. (2018). A Behavioral Theory of Social Performance: Social Identity and Stakeholder Expectations. Academy of Management Review, 43(2), 259–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolopoulou, K. (2014). Social Entrepreneurship Between Cross-Currents: Toward a Framework for Theoretical Restructuring of the Field. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(4), 678–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A.-C., & Chowdhury, I. (2012). Social Entrepreneurs as Institutionally Embedded Entrepreneurs: Toward a New Model of Social Entrepreneurship Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 494–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parris, D. L., & McInnis-Bowers, C. V. (2014). Social Entrepreneurship Questioning the Status Quo: Waste as a Resource. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(2), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624480209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship: A Critical Review of the Concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaskoff, J. (2012). Building the Heart and the Mind: An Interview with Leading Social Entrepreneur Sarah Harris. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 432–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pless, N. (2012). Social Entrepreneurship in Theory and Practice—An Introduction. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1533-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzoli, M., & Romolini, A. (2013). The Impact of Social Reporting on the Performance of Italian Social Enterprises. Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(3), 294–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, G. N. (1999). Social Entrepreneurial Leadership. Career Development International, 4(3), 140–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Praszkier, R., & Nowak, A. (2011). Social Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, T., & Vaccaro, A. (2017). Stakeholders Matter: How Social Enterprises Address Mission Drift. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, F. (2012). A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1413-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. (2017). Social Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship, Collectivism, and Everything in Between: Prototypes and Continuous Dimensions. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenberg, G., Cuskelly, G., & Auld, C. (2016). The Role of Intragroup Dynamics in Nonprofit Governance Models: A Systematic Quantitative Literature Review. Managing Sport & Leisure, 21(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2016.1169212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seanor, P. (2018). Of Course, Trust Is Not the Whole Story: Narratives of Dancing with a Critical Friend in Social Enterprise—Public Sector Collaborations. In P. Dey & C. Steyaert (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship: An Affirmative Critique (pp. 159–181). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Secretan, L. (2006). Leadership: Learning How to Dream Again. Journal of Financial Planning, 19(12), 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., Kistruck, G., & Cannatelli, B. (2016). The Impact of Moral Intensity and Desire for Control on Scaling Decisions in Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 677–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2447-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., Besharov, M. L., Wessels, A. K., & Chertok, M. (2012). A Paradoxical Leadership Model for Social Entrepreneurs: Challenges, Leadership Skills, and Pedagogical Tools for Managing Social and Commercial Demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J. (2017). How Matt Damon’s Nonprofit Aims to End the Global Water Crisis. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/davos-world-economic-forum-matt-damon-nonprofit-water-org-gary-white-to-end-water-crisis-stella-artois-partner/.

  • Stevens, R., Moray, N., & Bruneel, J. (2015). The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(5), 1051–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, L. A., & Zhang, D. D. (2011). Complexity Theory and the Social Entrepreneurship Zone. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 13(3), 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economic Times. (2007). MNCs Working Towards Greener India. The Economic Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Hindu. (2019). Environmentalists Oppose Plan to Draw Water from Linganamakki. The Hindu.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wire. (2019). Private Vendors Increase Prices by Over 100% as Chennai Water Crisis Continues. The Wire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorgren, S., & Omorede, A. (2018). Passionate Leaders in Social Entrepreneurship: Exploring an African Context. Business and Society, 57(3), 481–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315612070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topper, E. F. (2008). Social Entrepreneur Improves Literacy in the Developing World. New Library World, 109(1–2), 87–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800810846038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbig, D., Weitzel, U., Rosenkranz, S., & Av, W. (2012). Exploiting Opportunities at All Cost? Entrepreneurial Intent and Externalities. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(2), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A., & Post, J. E. (1991). Social Entrepreneurs and Catalytic Change. Public Administration Review, 51(5), 393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S. L. (1999). Social Entrepreneurship: The Role of Social Purpose Enterprises in Facilitating Community Economic Development. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnecke, T. (2018). Social Entrepreneurship in China: Driving Institutional Change. Journal of Economic Issues, 52(2), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2018.1469866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Equity. (2019). WaterEquity Announces Closing of Its US$50 Million Flagship Impact Investment Fund. Cision PR Newswire. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/waterequity-announces-closing-of-its-us50-million-flagship-impact-investment-fund-300830131.html?tc=eml_cleartime.

  • Whysall, P. (2000). Addressing Ethical Issues in Retailing: A Stakeholder Perspective. International Review of Retail, Distribution & Consumer Research, 10(3), 305–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, C. (2019, June 6). Towing an Iceberg: One Captain’s Plan to Bring Drinking Water to 4 Million People. Bloomberg Businessweek. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-06-06/towing-an-iceberg-one-captain-s-plan-to-bring-drinking-water-to-4-million-people.

  • Wolfe, A. B. (1925). Population and the Social Problem. American Economic Review, 15(3), 546–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wry, T., & York, J. G. (2017). An Identity-Based Approach to Social Enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 42(3), 437–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M., & Weber, K. (2007). Creating a World Without Poverty: Social Business and the Future of Capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M., & Weber, K. (2010). Building Social Business: The New Kind of Capitalism That Serves Humanity’s Most Pressing Needs. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arvind Ashta .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ashta, A. (2020). Social Entrepreneurship Theoretical Work Has Been Static. In: A Realistic Theory of Social Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32142-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics