Abstract
Statistics is the science of learning from data. Certainly, it is a modern technology that is part of the standards of today’s information age and is used in a wide array of fields. Statistics is a method to reduce complexity, separate signals from noise and distinguish significant from random. Statistical results are used for knowledge creation and decision-making processes. Statistical institutions are the producers of statistics. Using scientific statistical methods, data is collected and existing data is processed in order to calculate condensed information (i.e. facts), which is made available to the general public in different forms, such as statistical aggregates, graphics, maps, accounts or indicators. This work will be concerned neither with statistics in general nor with the history of theoretical statistics. Rather, the goal is to describe the status quo for a particular area of application, namely ‘official statistics’, based on an analysis of its historical genesis in order then to deploy strategic lines for the near future of this domain. Central to this work is the quality of statistical information. Statistics can only develop a positive enlightenment effect on the condition that their quality is trusted. To ensure long-term trust in statistics, it is necessary to deal with questions of knowledge, quantification and the function of facts in the social debate. The more concrete an answer that can be given to such questions, the more possible it will be to protect statistics against inappropriate expectations and to address false criticism.
To measure for public purposes is rarely so simple as to apply a meter stick casually to an object.
Porter (1995, p. 28)
In Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft bestimmt das von historischen, institutionellen und kulturellen Rahmenbedingungen abhängige, an Werten und Normen orientierte, vielfach interessengeleitete Verhalten der Menschen so weitgehend das Geschehen, dass schon eine sinnvolle Begriffsbildung und damit auch die Datenerhebung einen ganz eigenen, geradezu kulturorientierten Zugang erfordern. Das ist das Adäquationsproblem.*
Grohmann (2012, p. 59)
*In business and society, people’s behaviour, which depends on historical, institutional and cultural conditions, is oriented towards values and norms and is often guided by interests and determines what happens to such an extent that even the formation of meaningful concepts and thus the collection of data require a very individual, almost culture-oriented approach. This is the problem of adequacy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Luke 2:1: “In those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world.”
- 2.
- 3.
See in particular Sect. 3.3.
- 4.
- 5.
Desrosières explains: “Almost since its origin statistics has had two different but intertwined meanings: on the one hand denoting quantitative information, collected by the state … and, on the other, mathematical techniques for treatment of and argument over facts based on large numbers…” (Desrosières 2010, p. 112).
- 6.
‘Variables’ uses the terminology of Desrosières, which distinguishes between “making numbers” (or “data”) and “making variables” (or statistical “constructs”) and the embedding of variables in more complex models (such as National Accounts) (Desrosières 2010, p. 114).
References
Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Champkin, Julian. 2014. ‘The Timeline of Statistics’, Significance, January 24, 2014.
Davis, Kevin E., Angelina Fisher, Bendict Kingsburry, and Sally Engle Merry. 2012a. Governance by Indicators—Global Power Through Quantification and Rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davis, Kevin E., Benedict Kingsburry, and Sally Engle Merry. 2012b. Introduction: Global Governance by Indicators. In Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Quantification and Rankings, ed. Kevin E. Davis, Benedict Kingsburry, and Sally Engle Merry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Desrosières, Alain. 1998. The Politics of Large Numbers—A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Desrosières, Alain. 2008a. Commensuration and Probabilism: Two Kinds of Controversies About Statistics (1850–1940). In The Statistical Mind in Modern Society. The Netherlands 1850–1940—Volume II: Statistics and Scientific Work, ed. I.H. Stamhuis, P.M.M. Klep, and J.G.S.J. van Maarseveen. Aksant: Amsterdam.
Desrosières, Alain. 2008b. Gouverner par les nombres: L’argument statistique II. Paris: Les Presses de l’École des Mines.
Desrosières, Alain. 2008c. Pour une sociologie historique de la quantification: L’argument statistique I. Paris: Les Presses de l’École des Mines.
Desrosières, Alain. 2010. A Politics of Knowledge-Tools—The Case of Statistics. In Between Enlightenment and Disaster, ed. Linda Sangolt. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
Eurostat. 2016. Quality Declaration of the European Statistical System. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko. 2017. United Nations High Level Political Forum Opening Panel, 10 July 2017—Statement by Sakiko Fukuda-Parr. New York: United Nations.
Grohmann, Heinz. 1985. Vom theoretischen Konstrukt zum statistischen Begriff - Das Adäquationsproblem. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 69: 1–15.
Grohmann, Heinz. 2012. Ein Blick auf Geschichte und Bedeutung der Deutschen Statistischen Gesellschaft - Ansprache anlässlich des 100-jährigen Bestehens der Deutschen Statistischen Gesellschaft am 21. September 2011 in Leipzig. AStA Wirtsch Sozialstat Arch 2012: 57–60.
Hofstadter, Douglas R. 1979. Gödel, Escher, Bach—An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Basic Books.
Klep, P.M.M., and I.H. Stamhuis. 2002. The Statistical Mind in a Pre-statistical Era: The Netherlands 1750–1850. Aksant.
Plattform Industrie 4.0. 2013. Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0 - Abschlussbericht des Arbeitskreises Industrie 4.0. Frankfurt/Main: Plattform Industrie 4.0.
Porter, Theodore M. 1986. The Rise of Statistical Thinking: 1820–1900. Princeton, Guildford: Princeton University Press.
Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, N.J., Chichester: Princeton University Press.
Porter, Theodore M. 2004. Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age. Princeton, NJ, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Radermacher, Walter. 1992. Methoden und Möglichkeiten der Qualitätsbeurteilung von statistischen Informationen aus der Fernerkundung/Methods and Possibilities of Assessing the Quality of Statistical Data of Remote Sensing. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 169–179.
Radermacher, Walter. 2012a. Aus Zahlen lernen: “Die Statistikämter sollen sich als Institutionen politischer Bildung verstehen” Interview. Weiterbildung 4, August/September 2012.
Radermacher, Walter J. 2012b. Zahlen zählen - Gedanken zur Zukunft der amtlichen Statistik in Europa. AStA Wirtsch Sozialstat Arch 2012: 285–298.
Radermacher, Walter J. 2016. Les Statistiques Comptent - éviter le syndrome du lampadaire et avoir un citoyen européen éclairé. La Revue France Forum, no. 61.
Radermacher, W.J. 2017. Governance der amtlichen Statistik. AStA Wirtsch Sozialstat Arch 11: 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11943-017-0207-7.
Sangolt, Linda. 2010. A Century of Quantification and “Cold Calculation.” Trends in the Pursuit of Efficiency, Growth and Pre-eminence. In Between Enlightenment and Disaster—Dimensions of the Political Use of Knowledge, ed. Linda Sangolt. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
Stamhuis, Ida H., Paul M.M. Klep, and Jacques G.S.J. van Maarseveen (eds.). 2008. Statistics and Scientific Work. Amsterdam: Aksant.
Turnpenny, John R., Andrew J. Jordan, David Benson, and Tim Rayner. 2015. The Tools of Policy Formulation: An Introduction. In The Tools of Policy Formulation, ed. Andrew J. Jordan and John R. Turnpenny. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
van Maarseveen, Jacques G.S.J., Paul M.M. Klep, and Ida H. Stamhuis (eds.). 2008. Official Statistics, Social Progress and Modern Enterprise. Amsterdam: Aksant.
von der Lippe, Peter. 2012. Was hat uns die “Frankfurter Schule” der Statistik gebracht? - Darstellung einer deutschen Fehlentwicklung am Beispiel der Indextheorie von Paul Flaskämper. Duisburg: Institut für Betriebswirtschaft und Volkswirtschaft (IBES) - Universität Duisburg-Essen.
von Schlözer, August Ludwig. 1804. Theorie der Statistik. Nebst Ideen Ueber Das Studium Der Politik Überhaupt. Vandenhoek und Ruprecht: Goettingen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Radermacher, W.J. (2020). Official Statistics—An Introduction. In: Official Statistics 4.0. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31492-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31492-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31491-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31492-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)