Skip to main content

How This Account of Self-Feeling Contributes to Today’s Debates

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Self-Feeling

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 107))

  • 324 Accesses

Abstract

We saw in part I of this book that there are many challenges in contemporary philosophy of self-consciousness. The account of self-feeling presented in this book attempts to contribute to these problems. First, it avoids the problems of reflective theories, namely infinite regress and vicious circularity. Second, it overcomes the “ex negativo” challenge that alternative, current pre-reflective theories suffer from. Moreover, chapter “Self-Feeling and Unity” will further explore the problem of unity. In addition to the problems of philosophy of self-consciousness, this account of self-feeling contributes to philosophy of human affectivity by complementing the theory of existential feelings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This book maintains a broad understanding of the term “mental state”, not making any point about potential differences to propositional attitudes, mental events, and the like.

  2. 2.

    The terms pre-reflective and self-intimating are used interchangeably here.

  3. 3.

    This may also serve as an answer to a potential criticism from an orthodox Heideggerian perspective: Do we take the ontological level of “attunement” serious or are we stuck on a merely “ontic” level here? Besides the fact that it has been controversial among Heidegger scholars for long what the ontological-ontic distinction ultimately amounts to (see e.g. Sheehan 2014) we are safe due to the twofold characteristic of self-feeling. First, it constitutes the background structure of our experience so it accounts for the ontological level. Second, as a feeling it is part of experience and thus accounts for the ontic level.

  4. 4.

    For more detailed thoughts about the problem of unity please see chapter “Self-Feeling and Unity” below.

  5. 5.

    Notably, Henrich in his long unpublished paper (Henrich 2007 [1971]) shares his own doubts if his proposal actually succeeded to escape vicious circularity.

  6. 6.

    Block (2011a, p. 423) made a similar remark in his critique on higher-order theories.

  7. 7.

    Compare Ekman’s (1972, 1980) work on basic emotions.

  8. 8.

    Please note that there is a complicated and controversial discussion on the phenomenon of pain which I will not address in further detail here (for an overview see Aydede 2013). Pain shall here just be understood as an illustration of the complexities of subjective experience.

  9. 9.

    Note that this does not imply that we cannot become oblivious of our self-feeling at times. Compare Sects. 4 of chapter “Matthew Ratcliffe’s Theory of Existential Feelings” and 6 of chapter “The Features of Self-Feeling” for a detailed discussion.

  10. 10.

    Be that as it may, we cannot go into more detail on attention in this book. There is a great deal of work on this fascinating phenomenon that this book cannot do justice (see for an overview Mole et al. 2011; Nobre and Kastner 2014).

  11. 11.

    Compare also Musholt’s similar critique (Musholt 2015, pp. 5ff.).

  12. 12.

    Granted, Zahavi provided some analysis on the temporality, embodiment, and intersubjectivity of pre-reflective self-consciousness (Zahavi 2005, 2014).

  13. 13.

    Compare Rousse’s (2009) similar critique on that issue.

  14. 14.

    Personal conversation with Zahavi suggests that this is precisely what he had in mind.

Literature

  • Aydede, M. 2013. Pain. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/pain/. Accessed on: 27 July 2017.

  • Block, N. 2011a. The Higher Order Approach to Consciousness is Defunct. Analysis 71 (3): 419–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K. 1974. ‘Erlebnis’. Thesen zu Hegels Theorie des Selbstbewusstseins mit Rücksicht auf die Aporien eines Grundbegriffs nachhegelischer Philosophie. In Stuttgarter Hegel-Tage 1970, ed. H.-G. Gadamer, 537–603. Bonn: Bouvier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. 1972. Emotions in the Human Face. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1980. The Face of Man. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M. 2002a. Selbstgefühl. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Ansichten der Subjektivität. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Präreflexives Selbstbewusstsein. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S., and D. Zahavi. 2008. The Phenomenological Mind. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, D. 1966. Fichtes ursprüngliche Einsicht. In Subjektivität und Metaphysik. Festschrift für Wolfgang Cramer, ed. D. Henrich and H. Wagner, 188–233. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1970. Selbstbewusstsein. Kritische Einleitung in eine Theorie. In Hermeneutik und Dialektik. Band I, ed. R. Bubner, K. Cramer, and R. Wiehl, 257–284. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Denken und Selbstsein. Vorlesungen über Subjektivität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriegel, U. 2009. Subjective Consciousness. A Self-representational Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. 2011. Identity and Necessity. In Philosophical Troubles, Collected Papers, ed. S. Kripke, vol. 1, 1–27. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. 1992. Emotion and the Amygdala. In The Amygdala, ed. J.P. Aggleton, 339–351. New York: Wiley-Liss.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mole, C., Smithies, D. and Wu, W. 2011. Attention. Philosophical and Psychological Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R.J., T. Brosch, and D. Sander. 2014. The Functional Profile of the Human Amygdala in Affective Processing: Insights from Intracranial Recordings. Cortex 60: 10–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musholt, K. 2015. Thinking about Oneself. From Nonconceptual Content to the Concept of a Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobre, A. C. and Kastner, S. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pothast, U. 1971. Über einige Fragen der Selbstbeziehung. Klostermann: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D.M. 1986. Two Concepts of Consciousness. Philosophical Studies 94: 329–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousse, B.S. 2009. Self-awareness, Self-Understanding, and Self-interpretation. Paper Presented at the American Philosophical Association, Pacific Division, http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~hdreyfus/189_s08/pdf/Rousse_SelfUnderstanding.pdf. Accessed on: 27 July 2017.

  • Sander, D., J. Grafman, and T. Zalla. 2003. The Human Amygdala: An Evolved System for Relevance Detection. Reviews in the Neurosciences 14: 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, T. 2014. Making Sense of Heidegger: A Paradigm Shift. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. 1999. Self-awareness and Alterity. A Phenomenological Investigation. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Subjectivity and Selfhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kreuch, G. (2019). How This Account of Self-Feeling Contributes to Today’s Debates. In: Self-Feeling. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 107. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30789-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics