Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Basic Principles of Sustainable Land Use Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Current Trends in Landscape Research

Part of the book series: Innovations in Landscape Research ((ILR))

Abstract

The paper is aimed at the presentation of the integrative approach assessment of environmental land use conflicts. It presents basic principles of sustainable land use management. The changes in land use are reflected not only in changes of land cover. They are also the cause of changes in landscape structure and are the main initiation of many environmental problems. From this aspect, it is important to engage the land structure studies not only in the studies of land use forms and land cover, but also in the studies of position and relation in landscape (cause–consequence). To find the cause and casualties of these changes is very important for implementation of rationale landscape utilization. The basic tool for suitable landscape utilization is integrated landscape management as a major instrument of sustainable development. It must be based on understanding landscape systematically as geosystem. The every point of the landscape is representing the integrating scope, scene in which all natural resources are occurring as layers (geological sources, water and soil sources, climate, biotic sources and morphometric parameters) which are mixing together. It is seen as understanding the space as integration of particular natural sources in given area of landscape. Using one source can negatively affect the quality of other sources. For example, intensive use of soil resources can threaten water resources—negative impacts of chemistry, mechanization, and so on. Therefore, land use needs to be assessed on an integrated basis. From aspect of ‘sustainability’, the target is to define such landscape management, which would regulate socio-economic development in landscape with its natural, human, cultural and historical potential. It is based on matching the supply that is represented by landscape resources and demand that is represented by community needs and community requirements. The discrepancy between supply and demand (not respecting the properties of landscape resources) is the determining factor of formation of the environmental problems. The paper presents evaluation of environmental problems resulting from conflict of interests in the land use and methodology for sustainable land use that is based on the integrative approach to the landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antrop M (2000) Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agr Ecosyst Environ 77:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan, Rural Landsc: Process Futur Strat 70:21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson R, Angelstam P, Elbakidze M, Stryamets N, Johansson KE (2012) Sustainable development and sustainability: landscape approach as a practical interpretation of principles and implementation concepts. J Landsc Ecol 4:5–30. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0040-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baessler C, Klotz S (2006) Effects of changes in agricultural land-use on landscape structure and arable weed vegetation over the last 50 years. Agr Ecosyst Environ 115:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barančok P, Barančoková M (2013) Development of sports and recreational activities in the Chopok area (Nízke Tatry Mts.) and protection of important landscape elements. In: Fialová J, Kubíčková H (eds) Public recreation and landscape protection—with man hand in hand: conference proceedings. Mendel Univ, Dept Landscape Management, Brno, pp 27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian O, Haase D, Grunewald K (2012) Ecosystem properties, potentials and services—the EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecological indicators, challenges of sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. Quantif, Model Valuat/Account 21:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belcakova I (2016) Approaches to evaluation of landscape scenery—a conceptual contribution. In: Corniello L (ed) World heritage and degradation: smart design, planning and technologies. Scuola Pitagora Editrice, Napoli, pp 480–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell S, Nikodemus O, Penēze Z, Krūze I (2009) Management of cultural landscapes: what does this mean in the former Soviet Union? A case study from Latvia. Landsc Res 34:425–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender O, Boehmer HJ, Jens D, Schumacher KP (2005a) Analysis of land-use change in a sector of Upper Franconia (Bavaria, Germany) since 1850 using land register records. Landsc Ecol 20:149–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-003-1506-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender O, Boehmer HJ, Jens D, Schumacher KP (2005b) Using GIS to analyse long-term cultural landscape change in Southern Germany. Landsc Urban Plan 70:111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezák P, Mederly P, Izakovičová Z, Špulerová J, Schleyer C (2017) Divergence and conflicts in landscape planning across spatial scales in Slovakia: an opportunity for an ecosystem services-based approach? Int J Biodivers Sci, Ecosyst Serv Manag 13:119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1305992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicik I, Jelecek L, Stepanek V (2001) Land-use changes and their social driving forces in Czechia in the 19th and 20th centuries. Land Use Pol 18:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00047-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biopress—Linking pan-European landcover change to pressures on biodiversity [WWW Document] 2003. URL http://www.creaf.uab.es/biopress/index2.htm. Accessed on 12 June 2018

  • Bradley P, Yee S (2015) Using the DPSIR framework to develop a conceptual model: technical support document

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt J, Primdahl J, Reenberg A (1999) Rural land-use and landscape dynamics-analysis of ’driving forces’ in space and time. Land-use changes and their environmental impact in rural areas in Europe

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunisch V, Patthey P, Arlettaz RL (2011) Spatially explicit modelling of conflict zones between wildlife and snow sports: prioritizing areas for winter refuges. Ecol Appl 21:955–967. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-2167.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bunce RGH, Barr CJ, Clarke RT, Howard DC, Lane AMJ (1996) Land classification for strategic ecological survey. J Environ Manage 47:37–60. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1996.0034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunce RGH, Jongman RHG, Hojas L, Weel S (2007) 25 years landscape ecology. Scientific principles in practice. In: book of Abstracts. Proceedings of the 7th IALE world congress Part 1 and 2. international association for landscape, Wageningen, p 524

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürgi M, Hersperger AM, Schneeberger N (2004) Driving forces of landscape change—current and new directions. Landsc Ecol 19:857–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-004-0245-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bürgi M, Bieling C, von Hackwitz K, Kizos T, Lieskovsky J, Martin MG, McCarthy S, Muller M, Palang H, Plieninger T, Printsmann A (2017) Processes and driving forces in changing cultural landscapes across Europe. Landsc Ecol 32:2097–2112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0513-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway TM, Lathrop RG (2005) Modelling the ecological consequences of land-use policies in an urbanizing region. Environ Manag 35:278–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-4067-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CORINE Land Cover (CLC). Copernicus global land service providing bio-geophysical products of global land surface [WWW Document], 2018. URL https://land.copernicus.eu/global/. Accessed on 12 Apr 2018

  • Csorba P (1996) Landscape-ecological change of the land use pattern on the east foothill area of the Tokaj Mountains (Hungary). Ekol Bratisl 15:115–127

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot R (2006) Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan, Landsc Sustain 75:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Sherbinin A (2002) A CIESIN thematic guide to land-use and land-cover change (LUCC). Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) Columbia University Palisades, NY, USA, p 68

    Google Scholar 

  • Demková K, Lipský Z (2015) Changes in non-forest woody vegetation in the south-western part of the white carpathians (1949–2011). Geografie 120:64–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer J (1994) Land-use pattern, forest migration, and global warming. Landsc Urban Plan 29:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)90019-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2018a) Copernicus Land Monitoring Service—Urban Atlas [WWW Document]. European Environment Agency. URL https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/copernicus-land-monitoring-service-urban-atlas. Accessed on 12 June 2018

  • EEA (2018b) CICES Version 5.1 [WWW Document]. https://cices.eu/. URL https://cices.eu/. Accessed on 10 June 2018

  • ELI—The European land-use institute [WWW Document], 2018. URL https://www.eli-web.com/. Accessed on 12 June 2018

  • Falťan V, Krajcirovičová L, Petrovič F, Khun M (2017) Detailed geoecological research of terroir with the focus on georelief and soil—a case study of Kratke Kesy Vineyards. Ekologia (Bratislava) 36:214–225. https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2017-0018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, p 640

    Google Scholar 

  • Frelichova J, Fanta J (2015) Ecosystem service availability in view of long-term land-use changes: a regional case study in the Czech Republic. Ecosyst Health Sustain 1:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1890/EHS15-0024.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052%5b0143:PCAUDF%5d2.0.CO,2

  • Haddock J, Tzanopoulos J, Mitchley J, Fraser R (2007) A method for evaluating alternative landscape management scenarios in relation to the biodiversity conservation of habitats. Ecol Econ 61:277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young R, Potschin M, Kienast F (2012) Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecol Indic, ChallS Sustain Nat Cap Ecosyst Serv Quantif, Model Valuat/Account 21:39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova M, Michaeli E, Boltiziar M, Juhascikova J (2011) Analysis of landscape heterogeneity changes on the example of Hlinne, Vysny Zipov, and Zlatnik village (eastern Slovakia) in the period 1826–2006. Ekologia (Bratislava) 30:269–280. https://doi.org/10.4149/ekol_2011_01_269

    Google Scholar 

  • Izakovičová Z, Miklos L, Drdoš J (1997) Krajinnoekologické podmienky trvalo udržateľného rozvoja. VEDA publishing of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, p 183 (In Slovak)

    Google Scholar 

  • Izakovičová Z, Mederly P, Petrovič F (2017) Long-term land use changes driven by urbanisation and their environmental effects (example of Trnava City, Slovakia). Sustainability 9:1553. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izakovičová Z, Miklós L, Miklósová V (2018a) Integrative assessment of land use conflicts. Sustainability 10:3270. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izakovičová Z, Špulerová J, Petrovič F (2018b) Integrated approach to sustainable land use management. Environments 5:37. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments5030037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen K, Murray F (2005) Intellectual property. Enhanced: intellectual property landscape of the human genome. Science 310:239–240. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1120014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG (ed) (1996) Ecological and landscape consequences of land use change in Europe. In: Proceedings of the ECNC seminar on land use change and its ecological consequences. European Centre of Nature Conservation, Tilburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienast F, Frick J, van Strien MJ, Hunziker M (2015) The swiss landscape monitoring program—a comprehensive indicator set to measure landscape change. Ecol Model, Use Ecol Indic Model 295:136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolejka J (1987) Landscape-historical synthesis materials, methods and results. Ekologia CSFR 6:51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolejka J (2018) Landscape mapping using GIS and google earth data. Geogr Nat Resour 39:254–260. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372818030095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KolejkaJ (2006) Application of digital landscape model in crisis management. Geogr Tech 1:101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucher CA, Bunce RGH, Jongman RHG, Klijn JA, Koomen, E, Metzger, MJ., Wascher, DM (2003) Identification and characterisation of environments and landscapes in Europe (Scientific report). Alterra, Wageningen, p 119

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen P (2004) The DPSIR framework. In: Paper presented at the 27–29 september 2004 workshop on a comprehensive/detailed assessment of the vulnerability of water resources to environmental change in Africa using river basin approach. Presented at the UNEP Headquarters, Nairobi, Kenya, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P (ed) (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. UNEP/Earthprint, p 454

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes OT, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folke C, George PS, Homewood K, Imbernon J, Leemans R, Li X, Moran EF, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan PS, Richards JF, Skånes H, Steffen W, Stone GD, Svedin U, Veldkamp TA, Vogel C, Xu J (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Change 11:261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieskovsky J, Kaim D, Balazs P, Boltiziar M, Chmiel M, Grabska E, Kiraly G, Konkoly-Gyuro E, Kozak J, Antalova K, Kuchma T, Mackovcin P, MojsesM Munteanu C, Ostafin K, Ostapowicz K, Shandra O, Stych P, Radeloff VC (2018) Historical land use dataset of the Carpathian region (1819–1980). J Maps 14:644–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2018.1502099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipský Z (2000) Experience in assessment of landscape character. Ekol (Bratisl)/Ecol (Bratisl) 19:188–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky Z, Kopecky M, Kvapil D (1999) Present land use chances in the Czech cultural landscape. Ekol Bratisl 18:31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander U, Jongman RHG (1999) Ecological and socio-economic consequences of land use changes. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 269–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander U, Murka M (2003) Landscape coherence: a new criterion for evaluating impacts of land use changes. In: Mander U, Antrop M (eds) Multifunctional landscapes, Vol III: continuity and change. Wit Press, Southampton, pp 15–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander U, Palang H, Ihse M (2004) Development of European landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 67:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00025-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L (1996) Landscape-ecological theory and methodology: a goal oriented application of the traditional scientific theory and methodology to a branch of a new quality. Ekol Bratisl 15:377–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Izakovičová Z(1997) Krajina ako geosystém. VEDA publishing of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, p. 153, (In Slovak)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Kočická E, Izakovičova Z, Kočický D, Špinerová A, Diviaková A, Miklósová V (2019) Landscape as a geosystem. Springer International Publishing, p 157

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Miklisova D, Reháková Z (1986) Systematization and automatization of decision-making process in LANDEP method. Ekologia ČSFR 5:203–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchova Z, Leitmanova M, Petrovič F (2016) Possibilities of optimal land use as a consequence of lessons learned from land consolidation projects (Slovakia). Ecol Eng 90:294–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikodemus O, Bell S, Grine I, Liepins I (2005) The impact of economic, social and political factors on the landscape structure of the Vidzeme Uplands in Latvia. Landsc Urban Plan 70:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) OECD Environmental indicators. Towards Sustainable Development. Paris, p 155

    Google Scholar 

  • Olah B, Žigrai F (2004) The meaning of the time-spatial transformation of the landscape for its sustainable use (a case study of the transition zone of the Poľana Biosphere Reserve). Ekol Bratisl 23:231–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Oťahel’ J, Feranec J (2001) Landscape structure of Slovakia in the context of sustainability. Ekol Bratisl 20:88–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Oťahel’ J, Feranec J, Cebecauer T (2004) Landscape changes identified by application of the CORINE land cover databases: case study—Part of the Zahorie lowland. Ekol Bratisl 23:252–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Palang H, Alumäe H, Mander Ü (2000) Holistic aspects in landscape development: a scenario approach. Landsc Urban Plan 50:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palang H, Alumäe H, Printsmann A, Rehema M, Sepp K, Sooväli-Sepping H (2011) Social landscape: ten years of planning ‘valuable landscapes’ in Estonia. Land Use Policy 28:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauditšová E, Slabeciusova, B (2014) The modelling as platform for landscape planing. In: Geoconference on informatics, geoinformatics and remote sensing, vol iii SE International multidisciplinary scientific geoconference-SGEM CT 14th International multidisciplinary scientific geoconference (SGEM), 753–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauleit S (2018) The spatial effect of landscape planning. evaluation. Indicators Trends Raumforsch Raumordn 76:87–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-017-0509-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauleit S, Golding Y (2005) The spatial impact of urban compaction a fine-scale investigation based on Merseyside. Town Plan Rev 76:143–166. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.76.2.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauleit S, Ennos R, Golding Y (2005) Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change—a study in Merseyside. UK Landsc Urban Plan 71:295–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazur R, Otahel’ J, Maretta M (2015) The distribution of selected CORINE land cover classes in different natural landscapes in Slovakia: methodological framework and applications. Morav Geogr Rep 23:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2015-0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovič F (2006) Changes of the landscape with dispersed settlement. Ekologia (Bratislava) 25:201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Piscová V (2011) Zmeny vegetácie Tatier na vybraných lokalitách ovplyvnených človekom. VEDA publishing of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, p 227 (In Slovak)

    Google Scholar 

  • Poudevigne I, Alard D (1997) Landscape and agricultural patterns in rural areas: a case study in the Brionne basin, Normandy. France J Environ Manage 50:335–349. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quattrochi DA, Luvall JC (1999) Thermal infrared remote sensing for analysis of landscape ecological processes: methods and applications. Landsc Ecol 14:577–598. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008168910634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quattrochi DA, Luvall JC (2014) Thermal infrared remote sensing for analysis of landscape ecological processes: current insights and trends. Blackwell Science Publ, Oxford, p 43

    Google Scholar 

  • RegioResources 21—2018: Global megatrends and landscape, Abstracts.(2018) ILE SAS Bratislava, p 47

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehackova T, Pauditsova E, Hresko J (2008) The ecological stability and landscape management in Sverzov. Geogr Cassoviensis 2:146–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschke J, Huettich C (2014) Continuous field mapping of Mediterranean wetlands using sub-pixel spectral signatures and multi-temporal Landsat data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 28:220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romportl D, Chuman T, Lipsky Z (2013) Landscape typology of Czechia. Geografie 118:16–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy PS, Joshi PK (2002) Forest cover assessment in north-east India—the potential of temporal wide swath satellite sensor data (IRS-1C WiFS). Int J Remote Sens 23:4881–4896. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160110114475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy A, Royer A, Derksen C, Brucker L, Langlois A, Mialon A, Kerr YH (2015) Evaluation of spaceborne L-band radiometer measurements for terrestrial freeze/thaw retrievals in Canada. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 8:4442–4459. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2476358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröter D, Cramer W, Leemans R, Prentice IC, Araújo M, Arnell NW, Bondeau A, Bugmann H, Carter T et al (2005) Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe | science. Science 310:1333–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklenička P (2006) Applying evaluation criteria for the land consolidation effect to three contrasting study areas in the Czech Republic. Land Use Pol 23:502–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliva R (2007) Agricultural decline, landscape change, and outmigration: debating the sustainability of three scenarios for a Swiss mountain region. Mt Res Dev 27:124–129. https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.0907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Špulerová J, Hrnčiarová T, Piscová V, Vlachovičová M, Kalivoda H, Kanka R, Dobrovodská M, Kenderessy P, Miklošová V, Drábová M, Belčáková I (2016) Sustainable tourism development in a selected area of the low Tatras national park—landscape planning versus urban planning. Carpath J Earth Environ Sci 11:485–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Štefunková D, Hanušin J (2016) Analysis of the spatial and temporal distribution of selected landscape diversity indexes in detailed scale (example of viticultural landscape Svätý Jur). In Landscape and landscape ecology : Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Landscape Ecology (proceedings is indexed in WOS). Institute of Landscape Ecology SAS, Bratislava, pp 185–191. ISBN 978-80-89325-28-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Tengberg A, Fredholm S, Eliasson I, Knez I, Saltzman K, Wetterberg O (2012) Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosyst Serv 2:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tress G (2001) Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landsc Urban Plan 57:143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Donato DC, Romme WH (2013) Consequences of spatial heterogeneity for ecosystem services in changing forest landscapes: priorities for future research. Landsc Ecol 28:1081–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9741-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzanopoulos J, Mitchley J, Pantis J (2005) Modelling the effects of human activity on the vegetation of a northeast Mediterranean island. Appl Veg Sci 8:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1658/1402-2001(2005)008%5b0027:MTEOHA%5d2.0.CO,2

  • UNCSD (1996) Indicators of sustainable development framework and methodologies. United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • White M, Mladenoff D (1994) Old-growth forest landscape transitions from pre-european settlement to present. Landsc Ecol 9:191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggering H, Steinhardt U (2015) A conceptual model for site-specific agricultural land-use. Ecol Model 295:42–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zigrai F (1996) The relationship between basic and applied landscape-ecological research in Slovakia. Ekol Bratisl 15:387–400

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Scientific Grant Agency of Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic [No. 2/0078/18 “Research of biocultural values of landscape”].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 3, 84199, Bratislava, Slovakia

    Zita Izakovičová, László Miklós & Jana Špulerová

Authors
  1. Zita Izakovičová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. László Miklós
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jana Špulerová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zita Izakovičová .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Guest Scientist, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Brandenburg, Germany

    Lothar Mueller

  2. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Brandenburg, Germany

    Frank Eulenstein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Izakovičová, Z., Miklós, L., Špulerová, J. (2019). Basic Principles of Sustainable Land Use Management. In: Mueller, L., Eulenstein, F. (eds) Current Trends in Landscape Research. Innovations in Landscape Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30069-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation