Abstract
It is well known that educators such as Froebel, Dienes, and Gattegno recommend periods of free play with material objects before introducing mathematical questions designed to lead learners to encounter and articulate underlying mathematical relationships.
In this chapter, I challenge a proposed distinction between play and exploration (Panksepp, Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998) in the context of mathematics, and I advance the conjecture that inviting learners to engage in a preliminary mental free play with the situation or context proposed in a word problem could serve to enrich learners’ awareness of the underlying mathematical relationships which are needed in order to resolve the specific problem. Also, after solving the initial problem, playing with a successful method and varying quantities in the problem can enrich the example space of solvable problems and increase the chance of similar actions becoming available when faced with similar problems in the future. When teachers act playfully with tasks that they are going to assign to learners, they may find pedagogical affordances opening up of which they were previously unaware.
In homage to the insight and design skills of my friend and colleague Malcolm Swan.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Change history
01 February 2020
The published version of this book included multiple errors in code listings throughout the book. These code listings have now been corrected and text has been updated.
References
Bills, L. (1996). The use of examples in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In L. Puig and A. Gutierrez (Eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 2.81–2.88). Valencia: Universitat de València.
Bland, M. (1841). Algebraical problems producing simple and quadratic equations with their solutions designed as an introduction to the higher branches of analytics: To which is added an appendix containing a collection of problems on the nature and solution of equations of higher dimensions (8th ed.). London: Whitaker & Sons.
Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.
Bowland (web). www.bowlandmaths.org.uk
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactiques des mathématiques, 1970–1990 (N. Balacheff, M., Cooper, R., Sutherland, V., Warfield, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Brown, S., & Walter, M. (1983). The art of problem posing. Philadelphia: Franklin Press.
Bruner, J. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cane, J. (2017). Mathematical journeys: Our journey in colour with Cuisenaire rods. Mathematics Teaching, 257, 7–11.
Chevallard, Y. (1985). La Transposition Didactique. Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.
Clement, J., Lochhead, J., & Monk, G. (1981). Translation difficulties in learning mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly, 88(4), 286–290.
CompleteMath.Onmason. (2016). completemath.onmason.com/2016/12/02/burning-candle-task/
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, P., & Mark, J. (1996). Habits of mind: An organizing principle for mathematics curricula. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 375–402.
Davis, R. (1982). B63, Madison project: Robert B. Davis introducing integers with pebbles in the bag. https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/56002/. Accessed Dec 2018.
Dienes, Z. (1973). The six stages in the process of learning mathematics (P. Seaborne, Trans.). Slough: NFER.
Froebel, F. (1902). The education of man (Hailman, Trans.). London: Edward Arnold. (Original published 1884).
Gardiner, A. (1992). Recurring themes in school mathematics: Part 1 direct and inverse operations. Mathematics in School, 21(5), 5–7.
Gardiner, A. (1993a). Recurring themes in school mathematics: Part 2 reasons and reasoning. Mathematics in School, 23(1), 20–21.
Gardiner, A. (1993b). Recurring themes in school mathematics: Part 3 generalised arithmetic. Mathematics in School, 22(2), 20–21.
Gardiner, A. (1993c). Recurring themes in school mathematics, part 4 infinity. Mathematics in School, 22(4), 19–21.
Gattegno, C. (1970). What we owe children: The subordination of teaching to learning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Gattegno, C. (1957). Mathematics with numbers in colour. Reading: Education Explorers Ltd.
Gattegno, C. (1984). Infinity. Mathematics Teaching, 107, 19–20.
Goutard, M. (1963). Talks for primary teachers: On the Cuisenairre-Gattegno approach to teaching mathematics (Mathematics teaching series). Reading, England: Educational Explorers.
Grey, P. (2008). Blog. www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/200811/the-value-play-I-the-definition-play-gives-insights
Hamilton, E., & Cairns, H. (Eds.). (1961). Plato: The collected dialogues including the letters (Bollingen series) (Vol. LXXI). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hartlaub, G. F. (1922). Der Genius im Kinde. Breslau, Poland: Hirt.
Krutetskii, V. (1968). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching mathematics (J. Teller, Trans. 1976). J. Kilpatrick & I. Wirszup (Eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Love, E., & Mason, J. (1992). Teaching mathematics: Action and awareness. Milton Keynes, England: Open University.
Lowenfeld, M. (1935). Play in childhood. New York: Wiley.
Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 243–267.
Mason, J. (2001a). Modelling modelling: Where is the centre of gravity of-for-when modelling? In J. Matos, W. Blum, S. Houston, & S. Carreira (Eds.), Modelling and mathematics education: ICTMA 9 applications in science and technology (pp. 39–61). Chichester, England: Horwood Publishing.
Mason, J. (2001b). On the use and abuse of word problems for moving from arithmetic to algebra. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra, Proceedings of the 12th ICMI study conference (pp. 430–437). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.
Mason, J. (2002a). Generalisation and algebra: Exploiting children’s powers. In L. Haggerty (Ed.), Aspects of teaching secondary mathematics: Perspectives on practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Mason, J. (2002b). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Mason, J. (2002c). Mathematics teaching practice: A guidebook for university and college lecturers. Chichester, England: Horwood Publishing.
Mason, J. (2008). Being mathematical with & in front of learners: Attention, awareness, and attitude as sources of differences between teacher educators, teachers & learners. In T. Wood (Series Ed.) & B. Jaworski (Vol. Ed.). International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol. 4. The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (pp. 31–56). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Mason, J. (2012). Noticing: Roots and branches. In M. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Phillip (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 35–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mason, J. (2015). Being mathematical with and in-front-of learners. Mathematics Teaching. Video: www.atm.org.uk/John-Mason-Video
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982/2010). Thinking mathematically. London: Addison Wesley.
Mason, J., & Davis, B. (2013). The importance of teachers’ mathematical awareness for in-the-moment pedagogy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(2), 182–197.
Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004). Fundamental constructs in mathematics education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1972). Autopoesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
Meyer, D. (2015). Three act math. UTube. Accessed Nov 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89z1jkAsgYs
NRiCH (web). nrich.maths.org/497. Accessed Nov 2017.
Open University. (1978). M101 mathematics foundation course. Block V Unit 1 p. 31. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Papic, M., & Mulligan, J. T. (2007). The growth of early mathematical patterning: An intervention study. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice: Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the mathematics education research Group of Australasia (Vol. 2, pp. 591–600). Adelaide, Australia: MERGA.
Pearce, K. (2013). www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_E3qkJiBBA
PĂłlya, G. (1962). Mathematical discovery: On understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving (Combined edition). New York: Wiley.
Proulx, J., & Maheux, J.-F. (2017). From problem solving to problem posing, and from strategies to laying down a path in: Taking Varela’s ideas to mathematics education research. Constructivist Foundations, 13(1), 160–167.
Read, H. (1958). Education through art. London: Faber & Faber.
Saunderson, N. (1740). The elements of algebra in ten books. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Seeley Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Snyder, B. (1970). The hidden curriculum. New York: Alfred-Knopf.
Treffers, A. & Goffree, F. (1985). Rational analysis of realistic mathematics education – The Wiskobas program. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Proceedings of PME 9 (Vol. 2, pp. 97–121). Utrecht, The Netherlands: PME.
Treffers, A. (1987). Three Dimensions, A Model of Goal and Theory Description in Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Reidel.
van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky. London: Blackwell.
Varela, F. (1999). Ethical Know-How: action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford: Stanford University press.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of the higher psychological processes. London: Harvard University Press.
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (1998). Questions and prompts for mathematical thinking. Derby, England: ATM.
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2002a). Extending example spaces as a learning/teaching strategy in mathematics. In A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.). Proceedings of PME 26 (Vol. 4, pp. 377–385). University of East Anglia.
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2002b). Student-generated examples in the learning of mathematics. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(2), 237–249.
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Whitehead, A. (1932). The aims of education and other essays. London: Williams and Norgate.
Winnicot, D. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.
Wright, J. (1825). Wright’s self examinations in algebra. London: Black, Young & Young.
Young, R., & Messum, P. (2011). How we learn and how we should be taught: An introduction to the work of Caleb Gattegno. London: Duo Flamina.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mason, J. (2019). Pre-parative and Post-parative Play as Key Components of Mathematical Problem Solving. In: Felmer, P., Liljedahl, P., Koichu, B. (eds) Problem Solving in Mathematics Instruction and Teacher Professional Development. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29215-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29215-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29214-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29215-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)