Skip to main content

Overlapping Shades of Blue: Exploring Police Officer, Supervisor, and Administrator Cultures of Police Integrity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring Police Integrity

Abstract

This chapter explores the contours of police integrity across the police agencies’ hierarchical structure. Instead of relying on the traditional non-supervisor/supervisor dichotomy, we differentiate across three levels of the police hierarchy (line officers, first-line supervisors, and administrators). Our results, based on the 2013/2014 survey of 664 police officers from 11 U.S. police agencies, indicate that non-supervisors, first-line supervisors, and administrators had similar views about misconduct seriousness and similar assessments of police misconduct as rule violating. Compared to supervisors, non-supervisors thought that less severe discipline would be appropriate in the majority of the scenarios. At the same time, there were no statistically significant differences in the expected discipline among non-supervisors, first-line supervisors, and administrators. The greatest degree of heterogeneity among non-supervisors, first-line supervisors, and administrators was discovered in their expressed willingness to report. Non-supervisors were not only more likely to say that they would adhere to the code of silence themselves than the first-line supervisors and/or administrators, but they were also more likely to say that most police officers would do the same. The results of our analyses clearly demonstrate the need to include a more complex differentiation of the respondents’ rank and supervisory status into future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We do not count police assignments as different hierarchical levels.

  2. 2.

    Web-based surveys traditionally have lower response rates than the surveys which are mailed, emailed, faxed, or phoned (e.g., Manfreda et al. 2008). In their comparison of survey modes, Shih and Fan (2008) found that the average web-based survey had a response rate of 34%.

References

  • Bidney, D. (1944). On the concept of culture and some cultural fallacies. American Anthropologist, 46(1), 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britz, M. T. (1997). The police subculture and occupational socialization: Exploring individual and demographic characteristics. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 21(2), 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucak, S. (2012). An examination of police cynicism in turkey and its impacts on officers’ perception of corruption. (Order No. 3558466, University of Illinois at Chicago). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 214. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1343688917?accountid=12598. (1343688917).

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (2011). Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, 2008. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice. Retrieved from: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/csllea08.pdf.

  • Chan, J. B. L. (1997). Changing police culture: Policing in a multicultural society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crank, J. (2014). Understanding police culture (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haarr, R. H. (1997). Patterns of integration in a police patrol bureau: Race and gender barriers to integrate. Justice Quarterly, 14(1), 53–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberfeld, M. R. (2013). Critical issues in police training (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Custom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberfeld, M. R., Lieberman, C. A., & Horning, A. (2018). Introduction to policing: The pillar of democracy (2nd ed.). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, S. (1998). Police subculture reconsidered. Criminology, 36(2), 343–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, M. J, Piquero, A. R., Powell, Z. A., & Greene, J. (2016). Expanding the measurement of police integrity. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39(2), 246–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, J. R., & Terrill, W. (2014). Relational demography and officer occupational attitudes: The influence of workgroup context. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kargin, V. (2009). An investigation of factors proposed to influence police officers’ peer reporting intentions. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/305066516?accountid=12598. (305066516).

  • Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivković, S., Harver, W. E., & Haberfeld M. R. (1997). The Measurement of Police Integrity. Final Report Submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivković, S., Harver, W. E., & Haberfeld, M. R. (2000). The Measurement of Police Integrity. Research in brief. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivković S. (2004). Measuring Police Integrity. In Piquero, A. R., Greene, J.R., & M. J. Hickman (Eds.). Police Integrity and Ethics. Wadsworth Publishing. (pp. 1.3–1.20).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Haberfeld, M. R. (Eds.). (2004). The contours of police integrity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Haberfeld, M. R. (2006). Enhancing police integrity. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, F. (2000). Comparing supervisor and line officer opinions about the code of silence: The case of Hungary. In M. Pagon (Ed.), Policing in Central and Eastern Europe: Ethics, integrity, and human rights (pp. 211–219). Ljubljana: College of Police and Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. (1917). The superorganic. American Anthropologist, 19(2), 163–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucukuysal, B. (2008). Determinants of Turkish police officers’ perception of integrity: Impact of organizational culture (Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S. (2004). Sharing the view: Line officer and supervisor evaluations of police corruption seriousness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In G. Mesko, M. Pagon, & G. Dobovsek (Eds.), Dilemmas of contemporary criminal justice (pp. 312–322). Ljubljana: Faculty of Criminal Justice, University of Maribor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S. (2015). Studying police integrity. In S. Kutnjak Ivković & M. Haberfeld (Eds.), Police integrity across the world. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Haberfeld, M. R. (Eds.). (2015). Police integrity across the world. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Klockars, C. B. (2000). Comparing police supervisor and line officer opinions about the code of silence: The case of Croatia. In M. Pagon (Ed.), Policing in central and Eastern Europe: Ethics, integrity, and human rights (pp. 183–195). Ljubljana: College of Police and Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Shelley, T. O. (2010). The code of silence and disciplinary fairness: A comparison of Czech police supervisor and line officer views. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 33(3), 548–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Shelley, T. O. (2008). The police code of silence and different paths toward democratic policing. Policing and Society, 18(4), 445–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S., Haberfeld, M., & Peacock, R. (2016). Does discipline fairness matter for the police code of silence? Answers from the U.S. supervisors and line officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 39(2), 354–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S., Haberfeld, M., & Peacock, R. (2018). Decoding the code of silence. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(2), 172–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larwood, L., & Whittaker, W. (1977). Managerial myopia: Self-serving bias in organizational planning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 194–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Lim, H., Moore, D. D., & Kim, J. (2013). How police organizational structure correlates with frontline officers’ attitudes toward corruption: A multilevel model. Police Practice and Research, 14(5), 386–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H., & Sloan, J. J. (2016). Police officer integrity: A partial replication and extension. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 39(2), 284–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, B. (2010). Police occupational culture: Classic themes, altered times. Policing and Society, 20(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M., Cross, J. E., Shelley, T. O., & Kutnjak Ivković, S. (2013). The normative order of reporting police misconduct: Examining the roles of offense seriousness, legitimacy, and fairness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 76(3), 242–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P. (1989). Occupational culture. In W. G. Bailey (Ed.), The encyclopedia of police science. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P. K. (1997). Police work: The social organization of police work. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland. Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manfreda, K. L, Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., & Vehovar V. (2008). Web Surveys versus other Survey Modes: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates.International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 79–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marche, G. E. (2009). Integrity, culture, and scale: An empirical test of the big bad police agency. Crime, Law and Social Change, 51, 463–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhall, P., Barker, T., & Hunter, R. D. (1995). Police-community relations and the administration (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micucci, A. J., & Gomme, I. M. (2005). American police and subcultural support for the use of excessive force. Journal of Criminal Justice 33: 487–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederhoffer, A. (1967). Behind the shield. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagon, M., & Lobnikar, B. (2000). Comparing supervisor and line officer opinions about the code of silence: The case of Slovenia. In M. Pagon (Ed.), Policing in Central and Eastern Europe: Ethics, integrity, and human rights (pp. 197–209). Ljubljana: College of Police and Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoline, E. A. (2001). Rethinking police culture: Officers’ occupational attitudes. New York: LFB Scholarly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoline, E. A., & Terrill, W. (2014). Police culture: Adapting to the strains of the job. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoline, E. A., Myers, S. M., & Worden, R. E. (2000). Police culture, individualism, and community policing: Evidence from two police departments. Justice Quarterly, 17(3), 575–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. E., & Prenzler, T. (2016). The code of silence and ethical perceptions: Exploring police officer unwillingness to report misconduct. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 39(2), 370–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poteyeva, M., & Sun, I. Y. (2009). Gender differences in police officers’ attitudes: Assessing current empirical evidence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 512–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raines, J. (2010). Ethics in policing: Misconduct and integrity. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuss-Ianni, E., & Ianni, F. A. (1983). Street cops and management cops: The two cultures of policing. New York, NY: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuss-Ianni, E. (1983). Two cultures of policing.New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, G. R., & Baldwin, J. N. (2006). Ethical climates and contextual predictors of whistle-blowing. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26(3), 216–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, G. R., & Baldwin, J. N. (2007a). Whistle-blowing and the code of silence in police agencies policy and structural predictors. Crime & Delinquency, 53(4), 605–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, G. R., & Baldwin, J. N. (2007b). Ethical climate theory, whistle-blowing, and the code of silence in police agencies in the state of Georgia. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, T. H., Fan X. (2008). Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis. Field Methods, 20(3), 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, J. R., Roche, S. P., Bilach, T. J., & Bontrager Ryon, S. (2017). Traditional police culture, use of force, and procedural justice: Investigating individual, organizational, and contextual factors. Justice Quarterly, 34(7), 1272–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklansky, D. A. (2007). Seeing blue: Police reform, occupational culture, and cognitive burn-in. In M. O’Neill & M. Marks (Eds.), Police occupational culture: New debates and directions. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J. (1994). Justice without trial. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J., & Fyfe, J. (1993). Above the law: Police and the excessive use of force. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica, 94, 143–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrill, W., Paoline, E. A., III, & Manning, P. K. (2003). Police culture and coercion. Criminology, 41(4), 1003–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, P. A. (1999). Police (canteen) sub-culture. An appreciation. British Journal of Criminology, 39(2), 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S., & Katz, C. M. (2011). The police in America: An introduction. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westley, W. A. (1970). Violence and the police. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun, I. (2003). A study of police officers’ perceptions of police deviance: From an occupational socialization perspective. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 89 p. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/305329643?accountid=12598. (305329643).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Haberfeld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kutnjak Ivković, S., Haberfeld, M.R., Peacock, R. (2019). Overlapping Shades of Blue: Exploring Police Officer, Supervisor, and Administrator Cultures of Police Integrity. In: Kutnjak Ivković, S., Haberfeld, M.R. (eds) Exploring Police Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29065-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29065-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29064-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29065-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics