Skip to main content

Towards a Computational Model of Artificial Intuition and Decision Making

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS 2019)

Abstract

The ability to perform a detailed decision-making approach based on large quantities of parameters and data is at the core of the majority of sciences. Traditionally, all possible scenarios should be considered, and their outcomes assessed via a logical and systematic manner to obtain accurate and applicable methods for knowledge discovery. However, such approach is typically associated with high computational complexity. Moreover, it is non-trivial for researchers to develop and train models with deep and complex model structures with potentially large number of parameters. However, there are compelling evidence from psychology and cognitive research that intuition plays an important role in the process of intelligence extraction and the decision-making process. More specifically, by using intuitive models, a system is able to take subsets from networks and pass them through a process to determine relationship that can be used to predict future decision without a deep understanding of a scenario and its corresponding parameters. When an artificial agent manifests human intuition properties, then we can describe this as artificial intuition. In this article, we discuss some requirements of artificial intuition and present a model of artificial intuition that utilises semantic networks to improve a decision system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dundas, J., Chik, D.: Ibsead: - a self-evolving self-obsessed learning algorithm for machine learning. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Emerg. Technol. 1(4), 74 (2011). (E-ISSN 2044-6004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Trovati, M.: Reduced topologically real-world networks. Int. J. Distrib. Syst. Technol. 6, 13–27 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Payne, L.K.: Intuitive decision making as the culmination of continuing education: a theoretical framework. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs. 46, 326–332 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graber, M.L., Kissam, S., Payne, V.L., Meyer, A.N.D., Sorensen, A., Lenfestey, N., Tant, E., Henriksen, K., LaBresh, K., Singh, H.: Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review. BMJ Qual. Saf. 21, 535–557 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hams, S.P.: A gut feeling? Intuition and critical care nursing. Intensive Crit. Care Nurs. 16, 310–318 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diaz-Hernandez, O., Gonzalez-Villela, V.J.: Analysis of human intuition towards artificial intuition synthesis for robotics. Mechatron. Appl. Int. J. (MECHATROJ) 1, 23 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Simon, H.A.: Making management decisions: the role of intuition and emotion. Acad. Manag. Exec. (1987-1989) 1(1), 57–64 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kahneman, D., Frederick, S.: Representativeness revisited: attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In: Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., Kahneman, D. (eds.) Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, pp. 103–119. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F.: Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behav. Brain Sci. 23, 645–665 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kahneman, D.: Maps of bounded rationality : a perspective on intuitive judgment and choice (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. He, J., He, P.: Fuzzy relationship mapping and intuition inversion: a computer intuition inference model. In: IEEE 2008 International Conference on MultiMedia and Information Technology, December 2008

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tao, W., He, P.: Intuitive learning and artificial intuition networks. In: IEEE 2009 Second International Conference on Education Technology and Training, December 2009

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frantz, R.: Herbert simon. Artificial intelligence as a framework for understanding intuition. J. Econ. Psychol. 24(2), 265–277 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Srdanov, A., Kovacevic, N.R., Vasic, S., Milovanovic, D.: Emulation of artificial intuition using random choice and logic. In: IEEE 2016 13th Symposium on Neural Networks and Applications (NEUREL), November 2016

    Google Scholar 

  15. Srdanov, A., Milovanović, D., Vasić, S., Ratković Kovačević, N.: The application of simulated intuition in minimizing the number of moves in guessing the series of imagined objects, February 2017

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boden, M.A.: The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Routledge, Abingdon (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, Z.-X., Zhong, W.: Barriers to organizational creativity in Chinese companies, pp. 339–367, April 2016

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bottom, W., Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., Kahneman, D.: Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Acad. Manag. Rev. 29, 695 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koestler, A.: The Act of Creation. Arkana, London (1989). OCLC: 22220796

    Google Scholar 

  20. Blancke, S., De Smedt, J.: Evolved to be irrational? Evolutionary and cognitive foundations of pseudosciences, pp. 361–379, January 2013

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pease, A., Corneli, J.: Chapter 10 Evaluation of Creativity, pp. 277–294. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kelly, J., Papalambros, P.Y., Seifert, C.M.: Interactive genetic algorithms for use as creativity enhancement tools. In: AAAI Spring Symposium: Creative Intelligent Systems (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bechara, A.: Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 10, 295–307 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schilling, M.A.: A “small-world” network model of cognitive insight. Creat. Res. J. 17(2–3), 131–154 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Collins, A.M., Loftus, E.: A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol. Rev. 82, 407–428 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brasethvik, T., Gulla, J.A.: A conceptual modeling approach to semantic document retrieval. In: Pidduck, A.B., Ozsu, M.T., Mylopoulos, J., Woo, C.C. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 167–182, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shastri, L.: A connectionist approach to knowledge representation and limited inference. Cognit. Sci. 12(3), 331–392 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Trovati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Johnny, O., Trovati, M., Ray, J. (2020). Towards a Computational Model of Artificial Intuition and Decision Making. In: Barolli, L., Nishino, H., Miwa, H. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems. INCoS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1035. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29035-1_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics