Skip to main content

The Tertiary Education Landscape in Australia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurs Creating Educational Innovation
  • 368 Accesses

Abstract

In an increasingly competitive global knowledge economy driven by the speeding up of worldwide interconnectedness, new organisations, including those in the educational and training sector, are being formed and reshaped at a rapid rate, in response to evolving demands for knowledge-intensive production.

This chapter presents an overview of the changing tertiary education landscape in Australia, where an active and entrepreneurial independent sector has gradually been moving into areas of education traditionally offered by the public sector, or into new areas where a gap has been identified, in response to student demand for greater choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tuition fees at university and technical colleges (pre-TAFEs) had been abolished in Australia by the Whitlam Labour Government in 1974. It also established the Commonwealth’s full responsibility for university funding. In 1989, the Hawke Labour Government reintroduced the fees, and established the Higher Education Contributions Scheme (HECS), a new system to defer payment of student fees. This became known as the ‘Dawkins Revolution’.

  2. 2.

    Founded as the Melbourne College of Divinity in 1910, it was awarded university status in 2012, becoming known as the University of Divinity.

  3. 3.

    Some states still regulate their single jurisdiction RTOs, notably Victoria and Western Australia.

References

  • Altbach, P. G. (Ed.). (1999). Private Prometheus: Private higher education and development in the 21st century. No. 77. London: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S., & Barney, J. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2013, April). Work-related training and adult learning, Australia. Accessed February 2016, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/4234.0Main%20Features1Apr%202013?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=4234.0&issue=Apr%202013&num=&view=

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2017). Accessed May 17, 2018, from https://www.abs.gov.au/

  • Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA). (2019). Accessed March 9, 2019, from https://www.asqa.gov.au/

  • Baron, R. A. (2004). Potential benefits of the cognitive perspective: Expanding entrepreneurship’s array of conceptual tools. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 169–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (2007). Entrepreneurship: A process perspective. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. A. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 19–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cargill, B. J. (2007). Models of organizational and managerial capability for the entrepreneurial university in Australia. PhD Thesis, Swinburne University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: IAU Press and Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (2003). Sustaining change in universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. Tertiary Education and Management, 9(2), 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (2004). Delineating the character of the entrepreneurial university. Higher Education Policy, 17, 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. (2017). The Australian idea of a university. Carlton, VIC: Melbourne University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2013). Entrepreneurship, social capital, and institutions: Social and commercial entrepreneurship across nations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 479–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1989). Some suggestions for research on entrepreneurial traits and characteristics. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(1), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. L. (1986). Private sectors in higher education: Structure, function, and change in eight countries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. L. (1988). Public and private sectors in higher education: A comparison of international patterns. Higher Education, 17, 699–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A., Haskins, G., & Robertson, I. (2009). Leading the entrepreneurial university. Oxford: University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goozee, G. (2001). The development of TAFE in Australia. Leabrook: National Centre for Vocational Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (2008). International trends and private higher education in India. International Journal for Education Management, 22(6), 565–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdan, A. (2013). An exploration into ‘private’ higher education in Saudi Arabia: Improving quality and accessibility? The ACPET Journal for Private Higher Education, 2(2), 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G., & Harman, K. (2004). Governments and universities as the main drivers of enhanced Australian university research commercialisation capability. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(2), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, P., & Khemka, K. (2012). Enroll the world in for-profit universities. Harvard Business Review, 90(1–2), 62–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinser, K., & Levy, D. C. (2005). The for-profit sector: US patterns and international echoes in higher education. PROPHE Working Paper Series, 5. Program for Research on Private Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. L., & Rhoads, R. A. (2004). Faculty entrepreneurialism and the challenge to undergraduate education at research universities. Research in Higher Education, 45(7), 739–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. C. (1986a). Higher education and the state in Latin America: Private challenges to public dominance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. C. (Ed.). (1986b). Private education: Studies in choice and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. C. (1993). Recent trends in the privatization of Latin American higher education: Solidification, breadth, and vigour. Higher Education Policy, 6(4), 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. C. (1999). When private higher education does not bring organizational diversity. Contributions to the Study of Education, 77, 15–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. C. (2002). Unanticipated development: Perspectives on private higher education’s emerging roles. Program for Research on Private Higher Education (PROPHE) Working Paper, (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. C. (2003). Private higher education. Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. C. (2006). The unanticipated explosion: Private higher education’s global surge. Comparative Education Review, 50(2), 217–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. C. (2013). The decline of private higher education. Higher Education Policy, 26(1), 49–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, M. B., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, 14(2), 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, D. W., Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2000). Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: Operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process. Journal of Management, 26, 1055–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado-Maldonado, A. (2004). The influence of international organizations in the field of higher education in Latin America: The analysis of one epistemic community in Mexico. Doctoral dissertation, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (1997). Markets in education. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2007). The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision. Higher Education, 53(3), 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university—Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mars, M. M., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2010). Academic entrepreneurship (re) defined: Significance and implications for the scholarship of higher education. Higher Education, 59(4), 441–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (2007). Innovation and entrepreneurship in VET: A professional development guide for the Australian vocational education and training sector. Adelaide: John Mitchell and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, A. I. (2004). Globalization and the emergence of for-profit higher education. Higher Education, 48(1), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, F., & Couturier, L. K. (2001). The new competitive arena market forces invade the academy. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 33(5), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, A. (2010). Fair choices: A higher education funding system based on consistent principles. ACPET Annual Conference, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, A. (2012). Graduate winners: Assessing the public and private benefits of higher education. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, A., & Cakitaki, B. (2016). Mapping Australian higher education 2016. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, B., Gueths, J., & Weber, D. A. (1988). The academic intrapreneur: Strategy, innovation, and management in higher education. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, S., Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Marketing under uncertainty: The logic of an effectual approach. Journal of Marketing, 73, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, P. (2012). Growth and consolidation of the Australian private higher education sector. The ACPET Journal for Private Higher Education, 1(1), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development (R. Opie, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of study. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. F. (2014). Self-employment and business cycle persistence: Does the composition of employment matter for economic recoveries? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 46, 200–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2005). European universities for entrepreneurship: Their role in the Europe of knowledge the theoretical context. Higher Education Management and Policy, 17(3), 65–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szekeres, J. (2012). From public to private—The shifting sands of higher education. Association for Tertiary Education Management and Tertiary Education Facilities Managers’ Association, pp. 172–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA). (2019). Accessed January 9, 2019, from http://www.teqsa.gov.au/national-register

  • Thornton, M. (2012, March 28). Corporate hue colours issues of accountability. The Australian, Higher Education Supplement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triventi, M., & Trivellato, P. (2012). Does graduating from a private university make a difference? Evidence from Italy. European Journal of Education, 47(2), 260–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K., Heinz, K. L., & DeSoucey, M. (2008). Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 529–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, R. (1998). Learning for life: Review of higher education financing and policy: Final report. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DEETYA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. J. (2003). The higher education market in the United Kingdom. In P. Teixeira, B. Jongloed, D. Dill, & A. Amaral. Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality? Higher Education Dynamics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. (2008). New look at creativity in the entrepreneurial process. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hougaz, L. (2020). The Tertiary Education Landscape in Australia. In: Entrepreneurs Creating Educational Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28655-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics